Assessment of protein structure predictions

Computational Structural Biology: Methods and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 89-109

  Capriotti, E ^a   Marti Renom, M A ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN PRÍNCIPE FELIPE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION;

EID: 84969165486     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812778789_0004     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Kopp J, Schwede T. (2006) The SWISS-MODEL Repository: new features and functionalities. Nucl Acids Res 34: D315-D318.
2. Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, et al. (2006) MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucl Acids Res 34: D291-D295.
3. Castrignano T, De Meo PD, Cozzetto D, Talamo IG, Tramontano A. (2006) The PMDB Protein Model Database. Nucl Acids Res 34: D306-D309.
4. Baker D, Sali A. (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
5. Ginalski K, Grishin NV, Godzik A, Rychlewski L. (2005) Practical lessons from protein structure prediction. Nucl Acids Res 33: 1874-1891.
6. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. (1996) Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 256: 623-644.
7. Domingues FS, Koppensteiner WA, Jaritz M, et al. (1999) Sustained performance of knowledge-based potentials in fold recognition. Proteins (3): 112-120.
8. Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A. (2002) Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci 11: 430-448.
9. McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. (2003) Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 19: 874-881.
10. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. (1999) Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 288:477-487.
11. Gatchell DW, Dennis S, Vajda S. (2000) Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions. Proteins 41: 518-534.
12. Vorobjev YN, Hermans J. (2001) Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability. Protein Sci 10: 2498-2506.
13. Seok C, Rosen JB, Chodera JD, Dill KA. (2003) MOPED: method for optimizing physical energy parameters using decoys. J Comput Chem 24: 89-97.
14. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. (2003) An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 53: 76-87.
15. Zhu J, Zhu Q, Shi Y, Liu H. (2003) How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies? Proteins 52: 598-608.
16. Lu H, Skolnick J. (2001) A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44: 223-232.
17. Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. (2007) Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein’s native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking. J Comput Chem 28: 2059-2066.
18. Felts AK, Gallicchio E, Wallqvist A, Levy RM. (2002) Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model. Proteins 48: 404-422.
19. Dominy BN, Brooks CL. (2002) Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J Comput Chem 23: 147-160.
20. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. (1998) Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11158-11162.
21. Wallner B, Elofsson A. (2003) Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci 12: 1073-1086.
22. Maupetit J, Tuffery P, Derreumaux P. (2007) A coarse-grained protein force field for folding and structure prediction. Proteins 69(2): 394-408.
23. Park B, Levitt M. (1996) Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 258: 367-392.
24. Allen KN. (2007) Form finds function. Nat Chem Biol 3: 452-453.
25. Case DA, Cheatham TE, 3rd, Darden T, et al. (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26: 1668-1688.
26. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, et al. (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4: 187-217.
27. Fogolari F, Brigo A, Molinari H. (2003) Protocol for MM/PBSA molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Biophys J 85: 159-166.
28. Soares TA, Daura X, Oostenbrink C, Smith LJ, van Gunsteren WF. (2004) Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45Alpha3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme. J Biomol NMR 30: 407-422.
29. Lee MC, Duan Y. (2004) Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model. Proteins 55: 620-634.
30. Hsieh MJ, Luo R. (2004) Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction. Proteins 56: 475-486.
31. Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, Kollman PA. (2001) Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 313: 417-430.
32. Fogolari F, Tosatto SC. (2005) Application of MM/PBSA colony free energy to loop decoy discrimination: toward correlation between energy and root mean square deviation. Protein Sci 14: 889-901.
33. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118: 11225-11236.
34. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. (2002) Evaluating conformational free energies:the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 7432-7437.
35. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. (1976) Statistical mechanical treatment of protein conformation. I. Conformational properties of amino acids in proteins. Macromolecules 9: 142-159.
36. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. (1991) A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253:164-170.
37. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. (1985) Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal-structures-quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
38. Levitt M, Chothia C. (1976) Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 261: 552-558.
39. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. (1986) Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 319: 199-203.
40. Sippl MJ. (1990) Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 213: 859-883.
41. Zhou H, Zhou Y. (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11: 2714-2726.
42. Sippl MJ. (1993) Boltzmann’s principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 7: 473-501.
43. Melo F, Feytmans E. (1998) Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J Mol Biol 277: 1141-1152.
44. Shen MY, Sali A. (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15: 2507-2524.
45. Samudrala R, Moult J. (1998) An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 275: 895-916.
46. Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov A, Gutin AM. (1995) Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins 23: 142-150.
47. Thomas PD, Dill KA. (1996) Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures:how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 257: 457-469.
48. Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. (1995) Are database-derived potentials valid for scoring both forward and inverted protein folding? Protein Eng 8: 849-858.
49. Melo F, Feytmans E. (1997) Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol 267: 207-222.
50. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. (1992) A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
51. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y. (2004) The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database. Biophys J 86: 3349-3358.
52. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Ceriani M, Tramontano A. (2007) Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category. Proteins, in press.
53. Skolnick J. (2006) In quest of an empirical potential for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16: 166-171.
54. Sippl MJ. (1995) Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5: 229-235.
55. Qiu J, Elber R. (2005) Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures. Proteins 61: 44-55.
56. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y. (2004) An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci 13: 400-411.
57. Buchete NV, Straub JE, Thirumalai D. (2004) Orientational potentials extracted from protein structures improve native fold recognition. Protein Sci 13:862-874.
58. Tosatto SC, Battistutta R. (2007) TAP score: Torsion angle propensity normalization applied to local protein structure evaluation. BMC Bioinform 8: 155.
59. Betancourt MR, Skolnick J. (2004) Local propensities and statistical potentials of backbone dihedral angles in proteins. J Mol Biol 342: 635-649.
60. Benkert P, Tosatto SCE, Schomburg D. (2007) QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins, in press.
61. Bradley P, Misura KM, Baker D. (2005) Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309: 1868-1871.
62. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick J. (2005) TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins 61(7): 91-98.
63. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 57: 702-710.
64. Eramian D, Shen MY, Devos D, Melo F, Sali A, Marti-Renom MA. (2006) A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models. Protein Sci 15:1653-1666.
65. Wallner B, Fang H, Elofsson A. (2003) Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller. Proteins 53(6): 534-541.
66. Rychlewski L, Fischer D. (2005) LiveBench-8: The large-scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 14: 240-245.
67. Kryshtafovych A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Moult J. (2005) Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins 61(7): 225-236.
68. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M, Samudrala R. (2004) Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct Biol 4: 8.
69. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Chivian D, Rohl C, Strauss CE, Baker D. (2001) Rosetta in CASP4: Progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins (5): 119-126.
70. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. (2004) SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify nearnative protein folds. J Comput Chem 25: 865-871.
71. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucl Acids Res 28: 235-242.
72. Samudrala R, Levitt M. (2000) Decoys "R" Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 9: 1399-1401.
73. DePristo MA, de Bakker PI, Lovell SC, Blundell TL. (2003) Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles. Proteins 51: 41-55.
74. van Gunsteren WF, Bakowies D, Baron R, et al. (2006) Biomolecular modeling:Goals, problems, perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45: 4064-4092.
75. Bowie JU, Zhang K, Wilmanns M, Eisenberg D. (1996) Three-dimensional profiles for measuring compatibility of amino acid sequence with three-dimensional structure. Meth Enzymol 266: 598-616.
76. Tosatto SC. (2005) The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. J Comput Biol 12: 1316-1327.
77. Melo F, Devos D, Depiereux E, Feytmans E. (1997) ANOLEA: a www server to assess protein structures. Ismb 5: 187-190.
78. Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ. (2007) ProSA-web: Interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucl Acids Res 35: W407-410.
79. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. (2004) Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins 56: 753-767.
80. Sims GE, Kim SH. (2006) A method for evaluating the structural quality of protein models by using higher-order phi-psi pairs scoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 4428-4432.
81. Pugalenthi G, Shameer K, Srinivasan N, Sowdhamini R. (2006) HARMONY: a server for the assessment of protein structures. Nucl Acids Res 34: W231-W234.