Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 288, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 477-487

  Lazaridis, Themis ^a   Karplus, Martin ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

Implicit solvation; Molecular dynamics; Protein folding; Threading

Indexed keywords

CHYMOTRYPSIN INHIBITOR; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SOLVATION;

EID: 0033531959     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2685     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Augspurger J. D., Scheraga H. A. An efficient, differentiable hydration potential of peptides and proteins. J. Comp. Chem. 17:1996;1549-1558.
2. Augspurger J. D., Scheraga H. A. An assessment of the accuracy of the RRIGS hydration potential: comparison to solutions of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J. Comp. Chem. 18:1997;1072-1078.
3. Bowie J. U., Luthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253:1991;164-170.
4. Brooks B. R., Bruccoleri R. E., Olafson B. D., States D. J., Swaminathan S., Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4:1983;187-217.
5. Brooks C. L. III, Karplus M., Pettitt B. M. Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure, and thermodynamics. Advan. Chem. Phys. 71:1988;1-259.
6. Bryngelson J. D., Wolynes P. G. Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;7524-7528.
7. Casari G., Sippl M. J. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. J. Mol. Biol. 224:1992;725-732.
8. Caves L. S. D., Evanseck J. D., Karplus M. Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin. Protein Sci. 7:1998;649-666.
9. DeBolt s. E., Skolnick J. Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures. Protein Eng. 9:1996;637-655.
10. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 319:1986;199-203.
11. Elber R., Karplus M. Multiple conformational states of proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. Science. 235:1987;318-321.
12. Finkelstein A. V. Protein structure: what is it possible to predict now? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:1997;60-71.
13. Fraternali F., van Gunsteren W. F. An efficient mean solvation force model for use in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins in aqueous solution. J. Mol. Biol. 256:1996;939-948.
14. Frauenfelder H., Sligar S. G., Wolynes P. G. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science. 254:1991;1598-1603.
15. Gibson K. D., Scheraga H. A. Minimization of polypeptide energy V. Theoretical aspects. Physiol. Chem. Phys. 1:1969;109-126.
16. Holm L., Sander C. Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. J. Mol. Biol. 225:1992;93-105.
17. Humphreys D. D., Friesner R. A., Berne B. J. Simulated annealing of a protein in a continuum solvation by multiple-time-step molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. 99:1995;10674-10685.
18. Kang Y. K., Nemethy G., Scheraga H. A. Free energies of hydration of solute molecules 1. Improvement of the hydration shell model by exact computations of overlap volumes. J. Chem. Phys. 91:1987;4105-4109.
19. Karplus M., Shakhnovich E. Protein folding: theoretical studies of thermodynamics and dynamics. Creighton T. E. Protein Folding. 1992;127-195 Freeman, New York.
20. Karplus M., Ichiye T., Pettitt B. M. Configurational entropy of native proteins. Biophys. J. 52:1987;1083-1085.
21. Koehl P., Delarue M. Polar and nonpolar environments in the protein core: implications for folding and binding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 20:1994;264-278.
22. Lazaridis T., Karplus M. "New view" of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science. 278:1997;1928-1931.
23. Lazaridis T., Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35:1999;132-152.
24. Levitt M. Molecular dynamics of native protein II. Analysis and nature of motion. J. Mol. Biol. 168:1983;621-657.
25. Marchler-Bauer A., Levitt M., Bryant S. H. A retrospective analysis of CASP2 threading predictions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 1:1997;83-91.
26. Marti-Renom M., Stote R., Querol E., Aviles F., Karplus M. Refolding of potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor by molecular dynamics simulations with disulphide bond constraints. J. Mol. Biol. 284:1998;145-172.
27. Monge A., Lathrop E. J. P., Gunn J. R., Shenkin P. S., Freisner R. A. Computer modeling of protein folding: conformational and energetic analysis of reduced and detailed protein models. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;995-1012.
28. Moult J. Comparison of database potential and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:1997;194-199.
29. Neria E., Fischer S., Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105:1996;1902-1921.
30. Noguti T., Go N. Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. I. Introduction. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 5:1989;97-103.
31. Novotny J., Bruccoleri R., Karplus M. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions. J. Mol. Biol. 177:1984;787-818.
32. Novotny J., Rashin A. A., Bruccoleri R. E. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 4:1988;19-30.
33. Park B. H., Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native fold from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996;367-392.
34. Park B. H., Huang E. S., Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J. Mol. Biol. 266:1997;831-846.
35. Privalov P. L., Makhatadze G. I. Contribution of hydration to protein folding thermodynamics II. The entropy and Gibbs energy of hydration. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;660-679.
36. Reva B. A., Finkelstein A. V., Sanner M. F., Olson A. J. Residue-residue mean-force potentials for protein structure recognition. Protein Eng. 10:1997;865-876.
37. Šali A., Shakhnovich E., Karplus M. How does a protein fold? Nature. 369:1994;248-251.
38. Samudrala R., Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 275:1998;895-916.
39. Smith L. J., Redfield C., Smith R. A. G., Dobson C. M., Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M., Walter M. R., Naganbushan T. L., Wlodawer A. Comparison of 4 independently determined structures of human recombinant interleukin-4. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;301-310.
40. Still W. C., Tempczyk A., Hawley R. C., Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;6127-6129.
41. Stouten P. F. W., Frommel C., Nakamura H., Sander C. An effective solvation term based on atomic occupancies for use in protein simulations. Mol. Simul. 10:1993;97-120.
42. van Gunsteren W. F., Berendsen H. J. C. GROMOS. 1987;University of Groningen.
43. Vorobjev Y. N., Amagro J. C., Hermans J. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 32:1998;399-4132.
44. Wang Y., Zhang H., Li W., Scott R. A. Discriminating compact nonnative structures from the native structure of globular proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;709-713.
45. Wesson L., Eisenberg D. Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution. Protein Sci. 1:1992;227-235.
46. Williams R. L., Vila J., Perrot G., Scheraga H. A. Empirical solvation models in the context of conformational energy searches: application to BPTI. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 14:1992;110-119.