Molecular Dynamics in the Endgame of Protein Structure Prediction

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 313, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 417-430

  Lee, Matthew R ^a   Tsai, Jerry ^b   Baker, David ^b   Kollman, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

MM PBSA; Proteins; Ranking; Refinement; Scoring

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRICITY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROSTATICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0035914481     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5032     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Vieth M., Kolinski A., Brooks C. L. III, Skolnick J. Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper. J. Mol. Biol. 237:1994;361-367.
2. Nilges M., Brunger A. T. Automated modeling of coiled coils - applicatino to the GCN4 dimerization region. Protein Eng. 4:1991;649-659.
3. Samudrala R., Xia Y., Huang E., Levitt M. Ab initio protein structure prediction using a combined hierarchical approach. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 3:1999;194-198.
4. Darden T., York D., Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98:1993;10089-10092.
5. Fox T., Kollman P. A. The application of different solvation and electrostatic models in molecular dynamics simulations of ubiquitin: how well is the X-ray structure "maintained"? Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 25:1996;315-334.
6. Roitberg A., Elber R. Modeling side-chains in peptides and proteins - application of the locally enhanced sampling and the simulated annealing methods to find minimum energy conformations. J. Chem. Phys. 95:1991;9277-9287.
7. Simmerling C., Lee M. R., Ortiz A. R., Kolinski A., Skolnick J., Kollman P. A. Combining MONSSTER and LES/PME to predict protein structure from amino acid sequence: application to the small protein CMTI-1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:2000;8392-8402.
8. Lee M. R., Duan Y., Kollman P. A. Use of MM-PB/SA in estimating the free energies of proteins: application to native, intermediates, and unfolded villin headpiece. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 39:2000;309-316.
9. Jorgensen W. L., Chandrasekhar J., Madura J. D., Impey R. W., Klein M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79:1983;926-935.
10. Lee M. R., Kollman P. A. Free energy calculations highlight differences in accuracy between X-ray and NMR structures and add value to protein structure prediction. Structure. 00:submitted;000-000.
11. Cornell W. D., Cieplak P., Bayly C. I., Gould I. R., Merz K. M., Ferguson D. M. et al. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:1995;5179-5197.
12. Beachy M. D., Chasman D., Murphy R. B., Halgren T. A., Friesner R. A. Accurate ab initio quantum chemical determination of the relative energetics of peptide conformations and assessment of empirical force fields. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:1997;5908-5920.
13. Kollman P., Dixon R., Cornell W., Fox T., Chipot C., Pohorille A. The development/application of a "minimalist" organic/biochemical molecular mechanic force field using a combination of ab initio calculations and experimental data. Wilkinson P., Weiner P., Van Gunsteren W. Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems. 1997;83-96 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
14. Srinivasan J., Cheatham T. E., Cieplak P., Kollman P. A., Case D. A. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of DNA, RNA, and phosphoramidate - DNA helices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:1998;9401-9409.
15. Still W. C., Tempcyzk A., Hawley R. C., Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;6127-6129.
16. Dominy B. N., Brooks C. L. III. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J. Comp. Chem. In the press:2001.
17. Lazaridis T., Karplus M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol. 288:1999;477-487.
18. Giesen D. J., Gu M. Z., Cramer C. J., Truhlar D. G. A univeral organic solvation model. J. Org. Chem. 61:1996;8720-8721.
19. Pitera J. W., Van Gunsteren W. The importance of solute-solvent van der Waals interactions with interior atoms of biopolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:2001;3163-3164.
20. Kollman P. A., Massova I., Reyes C., Kuhn B., Huo S. H., Chong L. et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc. Chem. Res. 33:2000;889-897.
21. Lee M. R., Baker D., Kollman P. A. 2.1 and 1.8 angstrom average C-alpha RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and S15. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:2001;1040-1046.
22. Vorobjev Y. N., Almagro J. C., Hermans J. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 32:1998;399-413.
23. Park B., Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996;367-392.
24. Gatchell D. W., Dennis S., Vajda S. Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 41:2000;518-534.
25. Brooks C. L. III, Karplus M., Pettitt B. M. Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure and thermodynamics. Advances in Chemical Physics. 1988;J. Wiley, New York. p. 1-259.
26. Dominy B. N., Brooks C. L. III. Development of a generalized Born model parameterization for proteins and nucleic acids. J. Comp. Chem. 103:1999;3765-3773.
27. Tsui V., Case D. A. Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acids with a generalized Born solvation model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:2000;2489-2498.
28. Liu Y., Beveridge D. L. Exploratory studies of ab initio protein structure prediction: multiple copy simulated annealing, AMBER energy functions and a generalized Born/Solven accessibility solvation model. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. In the press:2001.
29. Case D. A., Pearlman D. A., Caldwell J. A., Cheatham T. E., Ross W. S. et al. AMBER 5.0. 1997;University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
30. Simons K. T., Bonneau R., Ruczinski I., Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 3:1999;171-176.
31. Ryckaert J. P., Ciccotti G., Berendsen H. J. C. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comp. Phys. 23:1977;327-341.
32. Berendsen H. J. C., Postma J. P. M., van Gunsteren W. F., DiNola A., Haak J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81:1984;3684-3690.
33. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Sridharan S. Delphi II edit. 1998;Columbia University.
34. Lee M. R. Using molecular dynamics for high resolution protein structure prediction. PhD thesis in Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 2001;University of California, San Francisco.