Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 151-171

  Huettig, Falk ^a,b   Rommers, Joost ^a,c   Meyer, Antje S ^a,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; Language; Vision; Visual world paradigm

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; VISION;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79957951680     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003     Document Type: Review

References (262)

1. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:419-439.
2. Allport D.A. Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 1971, 10:104-108.
3. Altmann G.T.M. Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: The 'blank screen paradigm'. Cognition 2004, 93:79-87.
4. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
5. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:502-518.
6. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye-movements and mental representation. Cognition 2009, 111:55-71.
7. Altmann G.T.M., Mirkovic̀ J. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:583-609.
8. Andruski J.E., Blumstein S.E., Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition 1994, 52:163-187.
9. Arias-Trejo N., Plunkett K. The effects of perceptual similarity and category membership on early word-referent identification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2010, 105:63-80.
10. Arnold J.E. The effects of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference. Discourse Processes 2001, 31(2):137-162.
11. Arnold J.E., Altmann R., Fagnano M., Tanenhaus M.K. The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science 2004, 15:578-582.
12. Arnold J.E., Eisenband J.G., Brown-Schmidt S., Trueswell J.C. The immediate use of gender information: Eyetracking evidence of the time-course of pronoun resolution. Cognition 2000, 76:B13-B26.
13. Arnold J.E., Fagnano M., Tanenhaus M.K. Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:25-36.
14. Arnold J.E., Hudson Kam C., Tanenhaus M.K. If you say thee uh - You're describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:914-930.
15. Arnold J.E., Wasow T., Losongco T., Ginstrom R. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 2000, 76:28-55.
16. Bailey K.G.B., Ferreira F. The processing of filled pause disfluencies in the visual world. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, 485-500. Elsevier Inc, Oxford, UK. R.P.G. van Gompel, M.H. Fischer, W.S. Murray, R.L. Hill (Eds.).
17. Barr D.J. Analyzing 'visual world' eye-tracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:457-474.
18. Barr D.J. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition 2008, 109:18-40.
19. Barr D.J., Keysar B. Perspective-taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. Handbook of psycholinguistics 2006, 901-938. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Second Edition. M.J. Traxler, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
20. Barr D.J., Seyfeddinipur M. The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25:441-455.
21. Belke E., Meyer A.S. Single and multiple object naming in healthy aging. Language and Cognitive Processes 2007, 22:1178-1210.
22. Bock K., Irwin D.E., Davidson D.J. Putting first things first. The interface of language, vision, and action: What we can learn from free-viewing eye tracking 2004, 249-278. Psychology Press, New York. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
23. Bock K., Irwin D.E., Davidson D.J., Levelt W.J.M. Minding the clock. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:653-658.
24. Brock J., Norbury C., Einav S., Nation K. Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition 2008, 108:896-904.
25. Brouwer S. Processing strongly reduced forms in casual speech. MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 2010, 57. Ponsen & Looijen, Wageningen.
26. Brown P.M., Dell G.S. Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:441-472.
27. Brown-Schmidt S. Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 61:171-190.
28. Brown-Schmidt S. The role of executive function in perspective-taking during on-line language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16:893-900.
29. Brown-Schmidt S.B., Byron D., Tanenhaus M.K. That's not it and its not that: The role of conceptual composites in in-line reference resolution. On-line sentence processing: ERPS, eye movements and beyond 2004, 2009-2228. Psychology Press. M. Carreiras, C. Clifton (Eds.).
30. Brown-Schmidt S.B., Byron D., Tanenhaus M.K. Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:292-313.
31. Brown-Schmidt S., Gunlogson C., Tanenhaus M.K. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition 2008, 107:1122-1134.
32. Brown-Schmidt S., Konopka A.E. Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition 2008, 109:274-280.
33. Brown-Schmidt S., Tanenhaus M.K. Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:592-609.
34. Brown-Schmidt S., Tanenhaus M.K. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science 2008, 32:643-684.
35. Canseco-Gonzalez E., Brehm L., Brick C., Brown-Schmidt S., Fischer K., Wagner K. Carpet or Cárcel: Effects of age of acquisition and language proficiency on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25:669-705.
36. Cave K.R., Bichot N.P. Visuospatial attention beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:204-223.
37. Chambers C.G., San Juan V. Perception and presupposition in real-time language comprehension: Insights from anticipatory processing. Cognition 2008, 108:26-50.
38. Chambers C.G., Tanenhaus M.K., Eberhard K.M., Filip H., Carlson G.N. Circumscribing referential domains in real-time sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47:30-49.
39. Chambers C.G., Tanenhaus M.K., Magnuson J.S. Action-based affordances and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 2004, 30:687-696.
40. Chomsky N. Syntactic structures 1957, The Hague, Mouton.
41. Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax 1965, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Perspectives on sentence processing 1994, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Clifton, L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds.).
43. Clifton C., Staub A. Parallelism and competition in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Linguistics Compass 2008, 2:234-250.
44. Clifton C., Traxler M.J., Mohamed M.T., Williams R.S., Morris R.K., Rayner K. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:317-334.
45. Cohen J.D., Aston-Jones G., Gilzenrat M.S. A systems-level perspective on attention and cognitive control: Guided activation, adaptive gating, conflict monitoring, and exploitation vs. exploration. Cognitive neuroscience of attention 2004, 71-90. Guilford Press, New York. M.I. Posner (Ed.).
46. Connine C.M., Blasko D.G., Titone D. Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition?. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:193-210.
47. Cook A.E., Meyer A.S. Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:886-899.
48. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
49. Cree G.S., McRae K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:163-201.
50. Cutler A., Weber A., Otake T. Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics 2006, 34:269-284.
51. Dahan D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 42:317-367.
52. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:498-513.
53. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:453-459.
54. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K., Chambers C.G. Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47:292-314.
55. Davidoff J., Davies I., Roberson D. Color categories of a stone-age tribe. Nature 1999, 398:203-204.
56. Dell G.S., Repka R.J. Errors in inner speech. Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition 1992, 237-262. Plenum Press, New York. B.J. Baars (Ed.).
57. Dunabeitia J.A., Aviles A., Afonso O., Scheepers C., Carreiras M. Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition 2009, 110:284-292.
58. Eberhard K., Spivey-Knowlton M., Sedivy J., Tanenhaus M. Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1995, 24:409-436.
59. Engelhardt P.E., Bailey K.G.D., Ferreira F. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity?. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:554-573.
60. Farmer T., Anderson S., Spivey M. Gradiency and visual context in syntactic garden-paths. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:570-595.
61. Ferreira F., Apel J., Henderson J.M. Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:405-410.
62. Ferreira V.S., Pashler H. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:1187-1199.
63. Fodor J. The modularity of mind 1983, MIT Press Cambridge, Mass.
64. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
65. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:682-685.
66. Found A., Müller H.J. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimensional-weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:88-101.
67. Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University Linguistics Club. University of Connecticut.
68. Frazier L. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987, 559-586. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
69. Frazier L. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1995, 24:437-468.
70. Friedman-Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., Treisman A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 1995, 269:853-855.
71. Frost R. Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:71-99.
72. Gennari S.P., Sloman S., Malt B., Fitch T. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 2002, 83:49-79.
73. Gilbert A.L., Regier T., Kay P., Ivry R.B. Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103:489-494.
74. Gleitman L., January D., Nappa R., Trueswell J.C. On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57(4):544-569.
75. Golinkoff R.M., Hirsh-Pasek K., Cauley K.M., Gordon L. The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language 1987, 14:23-45.
76. Grice P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. III) 1975, 41-58. P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.).
77. Griffin Z.M. Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition 2001, 82:B1-B14.
78. Griffin Z.M. A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2003, 10(3):603-609.
79. Griffin Z.M. Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. The interface of language, vision, and action: What we can learn from free-viewing eye tracking 2004, 213-247. Psychology Press, New York. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
80. Griffin Z., Bock K. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 2000, 11:274-279.
81. Griffin Z.M., Oppenheimer D.M. Looking and lying: Speakers' gazes. Reflect locus of attention, not content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32(4):943-948.
82. Grodner D.J., Klein N.M., Carbary K.M., Tanenhaus M.K. "Some," and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition 2010, 116:42-55.
83. Grodner, D. J., & Sedivy, J. (in press). The effects of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. In N. Pearlmutter & E. Gibson (eds). The processing and acquisition of reference. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
84. Grosjean F. Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 1988, 3(3):233-274.
85. Grosjean F., Frauenfelder U.H. Spoken word recognition paradigms. Special Issue of Language and Cognitive Processes 1996, 11(6).
86. Gumperz J.J., Levinson S.C. Rethinking linguistic relativity 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
87. Hagoort P., Hald L.A., Bastiaansen M.C.M., Petersson K.M. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 2004, 304(5669):438-441.
88. Hanna J.E., Tanenhaus M.K. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 2004, 28:105-115.
89. Hanna J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., Trueswell J.C. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:43-61.
90. Hartsuiker R.J., Kolk H.H.J. Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 42:113-157.
91. Hawkins P.R. The syntactic location of hesitation pauses. Language and Speech 1971, 14:277-288.
92. Heller D., Grodner D., Tanenhaus M.K. The role of perspective in identifying domains of references. Cognition 2008, 108:811-836.
93. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Scene perception for psycholinguists. The interface of language, vision and action 2004, 1-58. Psychology Press, Hove. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
94. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology 2002, Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA.
95. Huang Y., Snedeker J. What exactly do numbers mean?. Paper presented at the Experimental Pragmatics Conference 2005, Cambridge, UK.
96. Huang Y., Snedeker J. Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58(3):376-415.
97. Huang Y., Snedeker J. Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in five-year olds: Evidence from real time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology 2009, 45(6):1723-1739.
98. Huang, Y. & Snedeker, J. (in press). Logic and Conversation revisited: Evidence for the division between semantic and pragmatic content in real time language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes.
99. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eye-tracking. The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond 2004, 187-207. Psychology Press, New York, NY. M. Carreiras, C. Clifton (Eds.).
100. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition 2005, 96:B23-B32.
101. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:985-1018.
102. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Looking at anything that is green when hearing 'frog' - How object surface color and stored object color knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 64:122-145.
103. Huettig F., Chen J., Bowerman M., Majid A. Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2010, 10:39-58.
104. Huettig F., Hartsuiker R.J. When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:341-360.
105. Huettig F., Hartsuiker R.J. Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25:347-374.
106. Huettig F., McQueen J.M. The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 54:460-482.
107. Huettig F., McQueen J.M. Retrieval and use of components of lexical knowledge depend on situational demands. Paper presented at the AMLaP 2008 conference in Cambridge, UK 2008.
108. Huettig F., McQueen J.M. AM radio noise changes the dynamics of spoken word recognition. Paper presented at the AMLaP 2009 conference in Barcelona, Spain 2009.
109. Huettig F., Quinlan P.T., McDonald S.A., Altmann G.T.M. Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica 2006, 121:65-80.
110. Humphreys G.W., Forde E.M.E. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 2001, 24:453-509.
111. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J., Price C.J. Top-down processes in object identification: Evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology, and functional anatomy. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 1997, 352:1275-1282.
112. Irwin D.E. Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, 105-134. Psychology Press, New York. J. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
113. Ito K., Speer S.R. Anticipatory effect of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:541-573.
114. Johnson E.K., Huettig F. Eye movements during language-mediated visual search reveal a strong link between overt visual attention and lexical processing in 36-month-olds. Psychological Research 2011, 75:35-42.
115. Johnson E.K., Huettig F., McQueen J.M. Conceptual attributes of heard words modulate toddlers' attention to the visual scene. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK 2008.
116. Ju M., Luce P.A. Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science 2004, 15:314-318.
117. Kaiser E., Runner J.T., Sussman R.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Structural and semantic constraints on the resolution of pronouns and reflexives. Cognition 2009, 112:55-80.
118. Kaiser E., Trueswell J.C. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition 2004, 94(2):113-147.
119. Kaiser E., Trueswell J.C. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:709-748.
120. Kamide Y. Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 2008, 2(4):647-670.
121. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., Haywood S.L. The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:133-156.
122. Kamide Y., Scheepers C., Altmann G.T.M. Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:37-55.
123. Keysar B., Barr D.J., Balin J.A., Brauner J.S. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 2000, 11:32-38.
124. Keysar B., Lin S., Barr D.J. Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition 2003, 89:25-41.
125. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:481-529.
126. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:519-543.
127. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W., Scheepers C., Pickering M.J. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition 2005, 95:95-127.
128. Kumada T. Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:698-708.
129. Lackner J.R., Tuller B.H. Roles of efference monitoring in the detection of selfproduced speech errors. Sentence processing. Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett 1979, 281-294. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ. W.E. Cooper, E.C.T. Walker (Eds.).
130. Land M.F., Mennie N., Rusted J. Eye movements and the roles of vision in activities of daily living: making a cup of tea. Perception 1999, 28:1311-1328.
131. Landauer T.K., Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 1997, 104:211-240.
132. Laver J. Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand 1980, Academic Press, New York. V.A. Fromkin (Ed.).
133. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking. From intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
134. Levelt W.J.M., Meyer A.S. Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2000, 12(4):433-452.
135. Li P. Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35(6):757-774.
136. Lockridge C.B., Brennan S.E. Addressees' needs affect speakers' syntactic choices. 11th Annual meeting of the society for text and discourse, UC Santa Barbara 2001.
137. Logan G.D. Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1985, 39:367-386.
138. Lucy J.A. Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
139. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101:676-703.
140. Magnuson J.S., Dixon J.A., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science 2007, 31:1-24.
141. Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition. Cognition 2008, 108:866-873.
142. Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N., Dahan D. The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:202-227.
143. Malpass, D. & Meyer, A. S. (2010). Parallel processing of objects in a naming task: Evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
144. Marian V., Spivey M. Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics 2003, 24:173-193.
145. Marian V., Spivey M. Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2003, 6:97-115.
146. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken wordrecognition. Cognition 1987, 25:71-102.
147. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistics and computational perspectives 1990, 148-172. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.).
148. Marslen-Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1978, 10:29-63.
149. Marslen-Wilson W., Zwitserlood P. Accessing spoken words: On the importance of word onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:576-585.
150. Mayberry M., Crocker M.W., Knoeferle P. Learning to attend: A connectionist model of the coordinated interplay of utterance, visual context, and world knowledge. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:449-496.
151. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18:1-86.
152. McDonald, S. A. (2000). Environmental determinants of lexical processing effort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/publications/thesis/online/IP000007.pdf.
153. McMurray B., Aslin R., Tanenhaus M., Spivey M., Subik D. Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in speech: Implications for categorical perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1609-1631.
154. McMurray B., Samelson V.M., Lee S.H., Tomblin J.B. Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI. Cognitive Psychology 2010, 60:1-39.
155. McMurray B., Tanenhaus M., Aslin R. Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition 2002, 86(2):B33-B42.
156. McMurray B., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. Within-category VOT affects recovery from "lexical" garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:65-91.
157. McQueen J.M., Dahan D., Cutler A. Continuity and gradedness in speech processing. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003, 39-78. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. N.O. Schiller, A.S. Meyer (Eds.).
158. McQueen J.M., Huettig F. Semantic and phonological priming of auditory lexical decision by pictures and printed words. Paper presented at the AMLaP 2005 conference in Ghent, Belgium 2005.
159. McQueen J.M., Viebahn M.C. Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:661-671.
160. McRae K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Tanenhaus M.K. Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:283-312.
161. Meyer A.S., Belke E., Telling A.L., Humphreys G.W. Early activation of object names in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:710-716.
162. Meyer A.S., Damian M.F. Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:494-503.
163. Meyer A.S., Ouellet M., Häcker C. Parallel processing of objects in a naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:982-987.
164. Meyer A.S., Roelofs A., Levelt W.J.M. Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48(1):131-147.
165. Meyer A.S., Sleiderink A.M., Levelt W.J.M. Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition 1998, 66(2):B25-B33.
166. Meyer A.S., Van der Meulen F.F. Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:314-319.
167. Meyer A.S., van der Meulen F., Brooks A. Eye movements during speech planning: Speaking about present and remembered objects. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:553-576.
168. Mirman D., Dixon J.A., Magnuson J.S. Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:475-494.
169. Mirman D., Magnuson J.S. Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:1026-1039.
170. Mishra R.K., Singh N. Online fictive motion understanding: An eye-movement study with Hindi. Metaphor & Symbol 2010, 25:144-161.
171. Mitchell D.C. On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical review. The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond 2004, 15-32. Psychology Press, New York, NY. M. Carreiras, C. Clifton (Eds.).
172. Mitterer H., McQueen J.M. Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:244-263.
173. Moors A., De Houwer J. Automaticity: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:297-326.
174. Morgan J., Meyer A.S. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:428-442.
175. Morgan J.L., van Elswijk G., Meyer A.S. The time-course of the phonological activation of successive object names: Evidence from word probe experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:561-565.
176. Morsella E., Miozzo M. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:555-563.
177. Moss H.E., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Access to word meanings during spoken language comprehension: Effects of sentential semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1993, 19:1254-1276.
178. Moss H.E., McCormick S.F., Tyler L.K. The time course of activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 1997, 12:695-731.
179. Motley M.T., Camden C.T., Baars B.J. Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1982, 21:578-594.
180. Müller H.J., Heller D., Ziegler J. Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:1-17.
181. Nadig A.S., Sedivy J.C. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 2002, 13:329-336.
182. Nation K., Marshall C.M., Altmann G. Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2003, 86:314-329.
183. Navarette E., Costa A. Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:359-377.
184. Nelson D.L., McEvoy C.L., Schreiber T.A. The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
185. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 1994, 52(3):189-234.
186. Norris D., McQueen J.M. Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review 2008, 115:357-395.
187. Onifer W., Swinney D. Accessing lexical ambiguity during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition 1981, 9:225-236.
188. Oppenheim G.M., Dell G.S. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition 2008, 106:528-537.
189. Pallier C., Colome A., Sebastian-Galles N. The influence of nativelanguage phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science 2001, 12(6):445-449.
190. Panizza, D., Chierchia, G., Huang, Y., & Snedeker, J. (in press). The Relevance of polarity for the online interpretation of scalar terms. The Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 19.
191. Papafragou A., Hulbert J., Trueswell J. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 2008, 108:155-184.
192. Papafragou A., Massey C., Gleitman L. Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 2002, 84:189-219.
193. Papafragou A., Massey C., Gleitman L. When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 2006, 98:B75-B87.
194. Papafragou A., Trueswell J. Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63:64-82.
195. Postma A. Detection of errors during speech production. A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition 2000, 77:97-131.
196. Pratt J., Hommel B. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:835-845.
197. Reinisch E., Jesse A., McQueen J.M. Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye-movements immediately. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63(4):772-783.
198. Richardson D.C., Altmann G.T.M., Spivey M.J., Hoover M.A. Much ado about eye movements to nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:235-236.
199. Richardson D.C., Spivey M.J. Representation, space and Hollywood Squares: Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition 2000, 76:269-295.
200. Roberson D., Davies I., Davidoff J. Colour categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:369-398.
201. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 1992, 42:107-142.
202. Roelofs A. Attention and gaze control in picture naming, word reading, and word categorizing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:232-251.
203. Roelofs A. Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:353-368.
204. Roy D., Mukherjee N. Towards situated speech understanding: Visual context priming of language models. Computer Speech and Language 2005, 19:227-248.
205. Salverda A.P., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1108-1117.
206. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., McQueen J.M. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 2003, 90:51-89.
207. Sapir E. Language: An introduction to the study of speech 1921, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, NY.
208. Scheepers C. Syntactic priming of relative clause attachment: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition 2003, 89:179-205.
209. Schober M.F., Brennan S.E. Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. Handbook of discourse processes 2003, 123-164. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. A.C. Graesser, M.A. Gernsbacher, S.R. Goldman (Eds.).
210. Schober M.F., Clark H.H. Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 1989, 21:211-232.
211. Sedivy J., Tanenhaus M.K., Chambers C., Carlson G. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition 1999, 71:109-147.
212. Seidenberg M., Tanenhaus M., Leiman J., Bienkowski M. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of the knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:489-537.
213. Sereno, Cameron, O'Donnell Context effects in word recognition: Evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science 2003, 14(4):328-333.
214. Shatzman K.B., McQueen J.M. Prosodic knowledge affects the recognition of newly acquired words. Psychological Science 2006, 17:372-377.
215. Shillcock R. Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. Cognitive models of speech processing 1990, 24-49. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.).
216. Slobin D.I. From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking". Rethinking linguistic relativity 1996, 70-96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.J. Gumperz, S.C. Levinson (Eds.).
217. Slobin D.I. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought 2003, 157-191. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Gentner, S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.).
218. Snedeker J., Trueswell J.C. Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:103-130.
219. Snedeker J., Trueswell J.C. The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology 2004, 49(3):238-299.
220. Sorensen D.W., Bailey K.G.D. The world is too much: Effects of array size on the link between language comprehension and eye movements. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:112-115.
221. Spivey M., Geng J. Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research 2001, 65:235-241.
222. Spivey M., Grosjean M., Knoblich G. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors: Thinking with your hands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102:10393-10398.
223. Spivey M.J., Marian V. Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science 1999, 10:281-284.
224. Spivey M.J., Richardson D.C., Fitneva S.A. Memory outside of the brain: Oculomotor indexes to visual and linguistic information. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, Psychology Press, New York. J. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
225. Stephen D.G., Mirman D., Magnuson J.S., Dixon J.A. Lévy-like diffusion in eye movements during spoken-language comprehension. Physical Review, E 2009, 79:056114.
226. Swingley D., Fernald A. Recognition of words referring to present and absent objects by 24-month-olds. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:39-56.
227. Tabossi P. Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of unambiguous nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:153-162.
228. Tabossi P., Colombo L., Job R. Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research 1987, 49:161-167.
229. Tan L.H., Chan A.H.D., Kay P., Khong P.-L., Yip L.K.C., Luke K.K. Language affects patterns of brain activation associated with perceptual decision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2008, 105:4004-4009.
230. Tanenhaus M.K., Brown-Schmidt S. Language processing in the natural world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 2008, 363:1105-1122.
231. Tanenhaus M.K., Leiman J.M., Seidenberg M.S. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous ds in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:427-440.
232. Tanenhaus M.K., Magnuson J.S., Dahan D., Chambers C.G. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2000, 29:557-580.
233. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632-1634.
234. Tanenhaus M.K., Trueswell J.C. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension. Handbook of psycholinguistics 2006, 863-900. Elsevier Academic Press, New York. second edition. M. Traxler, M. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
235. Thompson C.K., Choy J.J. Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2009, 38:255-283.
236. Treisman A. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988, 40A:201-237.
237. Trueswell J., Gleitman L.R. Children's eye movements during listening: Evidence for a constraint-based theory of parsing and word learning. Interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, 319-346. Psychology Press, NY. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
238. Trueswell J.C., Sekerina I., Hill N.M., Logrip M.L. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 1999, 73:89-134.
239. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K. Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. Perspectives in sentence processing 1994, 155-179. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Clifton, L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds.).
240. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: The use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:285-318.
241. Tyler L.K., Marslen-Wilson W.D. The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning of Verbal Behavior 1977, 16:683-692.
242. Van Berkum J.J.A., Zwitserlood P., Hagoort P., Brown C. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:701-718.
243. Van der Wel R.P.R.D., Eder J.R., Mitchel A.D., Walsh M.W., Rosenbaum D.A. Trajectories emerging from discrete versus continuous processing models in phonological competitor tasks: A commentary on Spivey. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:588-594. Grosjean, Knoblich (Eds.).
244. Van Gompel R.P.G., Pickering M.J. Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:851-857.
245. Van Gompel R.P.G., Pickering M.J., Pearson J., Liversedge S.P. Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:284-307.
246. Van Orden G.C., Johnston J.C., Hale B.L. Word identification proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:371-386.
247. Walsh M., Dickey J.J., Choy J.W., Thompson C.K. Real-time comprehension of wh- movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language 2007, 100:1-22.
248. Watson J.B. Behaviorism 1925, Norton, New York.
249. Watson D.G., Tanenhaus M., Gunlogson C. Interpreting pitch accents in on-line comprehension: H* vs LH*. Cognitive Science 2008, 32:1232-1244.
250. Weber A., Braun B., Crocker M.W. Finding referents in time: Eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents. Language and Speech 2006, 49:367-392.
251. Weber A., Cutler A. Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:1-25.
252. Weber A., Melinger A., Lara Tapia L. The mapping of phonetic information to lexical representation in Spanish: Evidence from eye movements. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007) 2007, 1941-1944. Pirrot, Dudweiler. J. Trouvain, W.J. Barry (Eds.).
253. Wheeldon L., Meyer A.S., van der Meulen F.F. Speech to gaze alignment in anticipation errors. Eye-movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, Elsevier, Oxford. R.P.G. van Gompel, M.H. Fischer, W.S. Murray, R.L. Hill (Eds.).
254. Whitney P., McKay T., Kellas G., Emerson W.A. Semantic activation of noun concepts in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1985, 11:126-135.
255. Whorf B.J. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf 1956, MIT Press, Cambridge. J.B. Carroll (Ed.).
256. Winawer J., Witthoft N., Frank M., Wu L., Wade A., Boroditsky L. The Russian Blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2007, 104:7780-7785.
257. Wühr P., Frings C. A case for inhibition: Visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:116-130.
258. Wühr P., Waszak F. Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop Effect. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31(6):983-994.
259. Yee E., Blumstein S.E., Sedivy J.C. Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:592-612.
260. Yee E., Huffstetler S., Thompson-Schill S.L. Function follows form: Activation of shape & function features during concept retrieval. Poster presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 2009.
261. Yee E., Overton E., Thompson-Schill S.L. Looking for meaning: Eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16(5):869-874.
262. Yee E., Sedivy J.C. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:1-14.