The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 441-455

  Barr, Dale J ^a   Seyfeddinipur, Mandana ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Common ground; Dialogue; Disfluency; Fillers; Perspective taking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 77951654603     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960903047122     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnold, J. E., Hudson Kam, C., & Tanenhaus, M. (2007). If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 914-930.
2. Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus,M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 579-582.
3. Baayen, R. H. (2007). languageR: Data sets and functions with 'Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics'. [Computer software manual].
4. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed andom effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-312.
6. Bailey, K. G., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 183-200.
7. Barr, D. J. (2001). Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. In C. Cavé, I. Guäitella, & S. Santi (Eds.), Oralité and gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp. 597-600). Paris: L'Harmattan.
8. Barr, D. J. (2003). Paralinguistic correlates of conceptual structure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 462-467.
9. Barr, D. J. (2008a). Analyzing 'visual world' eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 457-474.
10. Barr, D. J. (2008b). Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109, 18-40.
11. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2006). Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 901-938). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Bates, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes [Computer software manual]. (R package version 0.99875-9).
13. Brennan, S. E. (1990). Seeking and providing evidence for mutual understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
14. Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the Language-as-Product and Language-as-Action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274-296.
16. Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383-398.
17. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
19. Corley, M., MacGregor, L., & Donaldson, D. (2007). It's the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105, 658-668.
20. Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760-768.
21. Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 29, 320-326.
22. Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Interpretations of pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Processes, 34, 37-55.
23. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38.
24. Magnuson, J. S. (2005). Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 9995-9996.
25. Martin, J. G., & Strange, W. (1968). The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 3, 427-438.
26. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.R-project.org (ISBN 3-900051-07-0).
27. Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 25-38.
28. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 10393-10398.
29. Swerts, M. (1998). Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 485-496.
30. Swerts, M., & Geluykens, R. (1994). Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech, 37, 21-43.
31. Watanabe, M., Hirose, K., Den, Y., & Minematsu, N. (2008). Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners. Speech Communication, 50, 81-94.