Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 347-374

  Huettig, Falk ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Language production; Perceptual loop theory; Speech perception; Verbal self monitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF MONITORING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WRITTEN LANGUAGE;

EID: 77951172456     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960903046926     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don't: Mediating the mapping between language and visual world. In J. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 347-386). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
2. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80, 1-46.
3. Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., Herron, D., Lu, C. C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K.,Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A., & Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 344-380.
4. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
5. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107.
6. Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J. (1992). Errors in inner speech. In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 237-262). New York: Plenum Press.
7. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
8. Griffin, Z. M. (2004). Why look? Reasons for speech-related eye movements. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action (pp. 213-248). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 856-891.
10. Hartsuiker, R. J., Corley, M., & Martensen, H. (2005). The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Related Beply to Baars, Motley, and MacKay (1975). Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 58-70.
11. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113-157.
12. Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R.J. (2008).When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production. Memory and Cognition, 36, 341-360.
13. Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 460-482.
14. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
15. Lackner, J. R., & Tuller, B. H. (1979). Roles of efference monitoring in the detection of selfproduced speech errors. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing. Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 281-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
16. Laver, J. (1980). Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
17. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Lukatela, G., Eaton, T., Lee, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2001). Does visual word identification involve a sub-phonemic level? Cognition, 78, B41-B52.
20. Mattson, M., & Baars, B. J. (1992). Error-minimizing mechanisms: Boosting or editing? In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 263-287). New York: Plenum
21. Marshall, R. C., Rappaport, B. Z., & Garcia-Bunuel, L. (1985). Self-monitoring behavior in a case of severe auditory agnosia with aphasia. Brain and Language, 24, 297-313.
22. Marshall, J., Robson, J., Pring, T., & Chiat, S. (1998). Why does monitoring fail in jargon aphasia: Comprehension, judgment and therapy evidence. Brain and Language, 63, 79-107.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation competition and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. McNamara, P., Obler, L., Au, R., Durso, R., & Albert, M. (1992). Speech monitoring skills in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and normal aging. Brain and Language, 42, 38-51.
25. McQueen, J. M., & Viebahn, M. (2007). Tracking the recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 661-671.
26. Meyer, A. S. (2004). The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision and action (pp. 191-212). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
27. Motley, M.T., Camden, C.T., & Baars, B.J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 578-594.
28. Nickels, L. A., & Howard, D. (1995). Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209-237.
29. Oomen, C. C. E., Postma, A., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2005). Speech monitoring in aphasia: Error detection and repair behaviour in a patient with Broca's aphasia. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 209-225). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
30. Oppenheim, G.M., & Dell, G.S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528-537.
31. Özdemir, R., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W.J.M. (2007). Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech. Cognition, 105, 457-465.
32. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production. A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131.
33. Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2005). Basic processes in reading: Is visual word recognition obligatory? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 119-124.
34. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1990). Exploring the time-course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
35. Severens, E., Van Lommel, S., Ratinckx, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119, 159-187.
36. Slevc, L. R., & Ferreira, V. S. (2006). Halting in single-word production: A test of the perceptualloop theory of speech monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 515-540.
37. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
38. Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289-335.
39. Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442-472.
40. Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311-334.