Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing

The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 105-134

  Irwin, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909430971     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203488430     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Andersen, R. A., Batista, A. P., Snyder, L. H., Buneo, C. A., & Cohen, Y. E. (2000). Programming to look and reach in the posterior parietal cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd edition, (pp. 515-524). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Ball, K., Beard, B., Roenker, D., Miller, R., & Griggs, D. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 2210-2219.
3. Bertera, J. H., & Rayner, K. (2000). Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 576-585.
4. Bouma, H. (1978). Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII, (pp. 115-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Brockmole, J. R., Carlson, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (2002). Inhibition of attended processing during saccadic eye movements, Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 867-881.
6. Currie, C., McConkie, G. W., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 673-683.
7. Deubel, H., Irwin, D. E., & Schneider, W.X. (1999). The subjective direction of gaze shifts long before the saccade. In W. Becker, H. Deubel, & T. Mergner (Eds.), Current oculomotor research: Physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 65-70). New York: Plenum.
8. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W.X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1993-1997.
9. Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C., & Goldberg, M. (1992). The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 255, 90 92.
10. Edwards, D. C., & Goolkasian, P. A. (1974). Peripheral vision location and kinds of complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 244-249.
11. Engel, F. L. (1971). Visual conspicuity, directed attention, and retinal locus. Vision Research, 11, 563-576.
12. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
13. Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617-631.
14. Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1992). Characteristics of 'anti' saccades in man. Experimental Brain Research, 89, 415-424.
15. Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1996). Effects of procues on error rate and reaction times of antisaccades in human subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 109, 507-512.
16. Geissler, L. R. (1926). Form perception in indirect vision. Psychological Bulletin, 23, 135-136.
17. Germeys, F., De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of saccade target and flanker objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 868-883.
18. Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274-279.
19. Grindley, G., & Townsend, V. (1968). Voluntary attention in peripheral vision and its effects on acuity and differential thresholds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 11-19.
20. Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279-1296.
21. Harrington, D. (1981). The visual fields: A textbook and atlas of clinical perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby.
22. Henderson, J. M. (1992). Identifying objects across saccades: Effects of extrafoveal preview and flanker object context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 521-530.
23. Henderson, J. M. (1993). Visual attention and saccadic eye movements. In G. d'Ydewalle and J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye-movement research (pp. 37-50). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Henderson, J. M. (1996). Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 780-787.
25. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
26. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
27. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
28. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 449-463.
29. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196-208.
30. Henderson, J. M., Williams, C. C., Castelhano, M. S., & Falk, R. J. (2003). Eye movements and picture processing during recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 725-734.
31. Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32. Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
33. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
34. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.
35. Ikeda, M. & Takeuchi, T. (1975). Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 255-260.
36. Irwin, D. E. (1998). Lexical processing during saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 1-27.
37. Irwin, D. E. (2003). Eye movements and visual cognitive suppression. In D. Irwin & B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation volume 42: Cognitive vision, (pp. 265-293). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. Irwin, D. E., & Andrews, R. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui and J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Irwin, D. E., & Brockmole, J. R. (2000). Mental rotation is suppressed during saccadic eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 654-661.
40. Irwin, D. E., & Brockmole, J. R. (in press). Suppressing where but not what: The effect of saccades on dorsal- and ventral-stream visual processing. Psychological Science.
41. Irwin, D. E., Brockmole, J. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). Does attention precede involuntary saccades? Paper presented at Attraction, Distraction, and Action: An Interdisciplinary Conference and Workshop, Villanova, PA.
42. Irwin, D. E., & Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. (1996). Suppression of cognitive activity during saccadic eye movements. Psychological Science, 7, 83-88.
43. Irwin, D. E., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Andrews, R. V. (1995). Information processing during saccadic eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 90, 261-273.
44. Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance, and color singletons. Vision Research, 40, 1443 1458.
45. Irwin, D. E., & Gordon, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention, and transsaccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
46. Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882-895.
47. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
48. Klein, R. (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 259-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Klein, R., & Pontefract, A. (1994). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Revisited! In C. Umilta & M. Moskovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 333-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897-1916.
51. Kramer, A. F., Cassavaugh, N. D., Irwin, D. E., Peterson, M. S., & Hahn, S. (2001). Influence of single and multiple onset distractors on visual search for singleton targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 952-968.
52. Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Theeuwes, J. (1999). Attentional capture and aging: Implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control. Psychology and Aging, 14, 135-154.
53. Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Theeuwes, J. (2000). Age differences in the control of looking behavior: Do you know where your eyes have been? Psychological Science, 11, 210-217.
54. Kroll, J. F., & Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66.
55. Leibowitz, H., & Appelle, S. (1969). The effect of a central task on luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli. Human Factors, 11, 387-392.
56. Mackworth, N. H. (1976). Stimulus density limits the useful field of view. In R. A. Monty and J. W. Senders (Eds.) Eye movements and psychological processes (pp. 307 321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
58. Menzer, G. W., & Thurmond, J. B. (1970). Form identification in peripheral vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 205-209.
59. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
60. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neuroscience, 6, 414-417.
61. Mokler, A., & Fischer, B. (1999). The recognition and correction of involuntary prosaccades in an antisaccade task. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 511-516.
62. Munn, N. L., & Geil, G. A. (1931). A note on peripheral form discrimination. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 78-88.
63. Nelson, W., & Loftus, G. (1980). The functional visual field during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 391 399.
64. Parker, R. (1978). Picture processing during recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 284-293.
65. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107-123.
66. Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., & Irwin, D. E. (in press). Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics.
67. Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174-180.
68. Pomplun, M., Reingold, E., & Shen, J. (2001). Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects of task difficulty and divided attention. Cognition, 81, B57-B67.
69. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Posner, M., & Snyder, C. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt and S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669-682). New York: Academic Press.
71. Pringle, H., Irwin, D., Kramer, A., & Atchley, P. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 89-95.
72. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
73. Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 618-660.
74. Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211-236.
75. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
76. Rayner, K., & Fisher, D. L. (1987). Eye movements and the perceptual span during visual search. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 293-302). Amsterdam: North Holland.
77. Rayner, K., McConkie, G., & Ehrlich, S. (1978). Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 529-544.
78. Rayner, K., Well, A., & Pollatsek, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 537-544.
79. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
80. Reingold, E., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48-55.
81. Ryan, J., Althoff, R., Whitlow, S., & Cohen, N. (2000). Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory. Psychological Science, 11, 454 461.
82. Saida, S., & Ikeda, M. (1979). Useful visual field size for pattern perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 119-125.
83. Sanders, A. F., & Houtmans, M. J. M. (1985). There is no central stimulus encoding during saccadic eye shifts: A case against general parallel processing notions. Acta Psychologica, 60, 323-338.
84. Sanders, A. F., & Rath, A. M. (1991). Perceptual processing and speed-accuracy tradeoff. Acta Psychologica, 77, 275-291.
85. Schall, J. D. (1995). Neural basis of saccade target selection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 6, 63-85.
86. Scialfa, C., Thomas, D., & Joffe, K. (1994). Age differences in the useful field of view: An eye movement analysis. Optometry & Vision Science, 71, 736-742.
87. Sekuler, R., & Ball, K. (1986). Visual localization: Age and practice. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3, 864-867.
88. Shepherd, M., Findlay, J., & Hockey, R. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 475-491.
89. Shioiri, S., & Ikeda, M. (1989). Useful resolution for picture perception as a function of eccentricity. Perception, 18, 347-361.
90. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
91. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
92. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1595-1608.
93. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
94. Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Garnsey, S. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
95. van Duren, L., & Sanders, A. F. (1995). Signal processing during and across saccades. Acta Psychologica, 89, 121-147.
96. Viviani, P., & Swennson, R. G. (1982). Saccadic eye movements to peripherally discriminated visual targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 113-126.
97. Webster, R., & Haslerud, G. (1964). Influence on extreme peripheral vision of attention to a visual or auditory task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 269-272.