Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements

Cognitive Science

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 105-115

  Hanna, Joy E ^a   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Common ground; Communication; Conversation; Human experimentation; Language understanding; Perspective; Psychology; Reference resolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142290977     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Allen J.F. Byron D.K. Dzikovska M. Ferguson G. Galescu L. Stent A. Towards conversational human-computer interaction AI Magazine 22 2001 27-35
2. Barwise J. (1989). The situation in logic. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
3. Chambers C.G. Tanenhaus M.K. Eberhard K.M. Filip H. Carlson G.N. Circumscribing referential domains in real-time sentence comprehension Journal of Memory and Language 47 2002 30-49
4. Clark H.H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Clark H.H. Dogmas of understanding Discourse Processes 23 1997 567-598
6. Hanna J.E. Tanenhaus M.K. (in press). The use of perspective during referential interpretation. In J. C. Trueswell - M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), World situated language use: Psycholinguistic, linguistic, and computational perspectives on bridging the product and action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Hanna J.E. Tanenhaus M.K. Trueswell J.C. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation Journal of Memory and Language 49 2003 43-61
8. Henderson J.M. Ferreira F. (Eds.). (2004). The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world. New York: Psychology Press.
9. Horton W.S. Keysar B. When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition 59 1995 91-117
10. Keysar B. Barr D.J. Balin J.A. Brauner J.S. (1996, November). Common ground: An error correction mechanism in comprehension. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
11. Keysar B. Barr D.J. Balin J.A. Brauner J.S. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension Psychological Science 11 1 2000 32-37
12. MacDonald M.C. Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution Language and Cognitive Processes 9 2 1994 157-201
13. Matin E. Shao K.C. Boff K.R. Saccadic overhead: Information processing time with and without saccades Perception and Psychophysics 53 4 1993 372-380
14. Nadig A.S. Sedivy J.C. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution Psychological Science 134 2002 329-336
15. Searle J.R. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Tanenhaus M.K. Spivey-Knowlton M.J. Eberhard K.M. Sedivy J.E. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension Science 268 1995 632-634
17. Tanenhaus M.K.Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller - P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.