Taking a new look at looking at nothing

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 405-410

  Ferreira, Fernanda ^a   Apel, Jens ^a   Henderson, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

COGNITIVE SCIENCES; EXTERNAL-; INTERNAL MEMORY; JUST-IN-TIME; RELEVANT OBJECTS; SPARSE REPRESENTATIONS; VISUAL COGNITION; VISUAL ENVIRONMENTS; VISUAL INFORMATIONS; VISUAL SYSTEMS;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MEMORY; SACCADES; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 53949110054     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Buswell G. How People Look at Pictures (1935), University of Chicago Press
2. Yarbus A. Eye Movements and Vision (1967), Plenum Press
3. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 124 (1998) 372-422
4. Henderson J.M. Human gaze control in real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2003) 498-504
5. Altmann G.T. Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: the 'blank screen paradigm'. Cognition 93 (2004) B79-B87
6. Richardson D.C., and Spivey M.J. Representation, space and Hollywood Squares: looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition 76 (2000) 269-295
7. Johansson R., et al. Pictures and spoken descriptions elicit similar eye movements during mental imagery, both in light and in complete darkness. Cogn. Sci. 30 (2006) 1053-1079
8. Hoover M.A., and Richardson D.C. When facts go down the rabbit hole: contrasting features and objecthood as indexes to memory. Cognition 108 (2008) 533-542
9. Hollingworth A., and Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 113-136
10. Hollingworth A. Visual memory for natural scenes. In: Luck S.J., and Hollingworth A. (Eds). Visual Memory (2008), Oxford University Press 123-162
11. Henderson J.M. Eye movements and visual memory. In: Luck S.J., and Hollingworth A. (Eds). Visual Memory (2008), Oxford University Press 87-121
12. Thompson D.M., and Tulving E. Associative encoding and retrieval: weak and strong cues. J. Exp. Psychol. 86 (1970) 255-262
13. Tulving E., and Thompson D.M. Encoding Specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychol. Rev. 80 (1973) 352-373
14. Roediger H.L., and Guynn M.J. Retrieval processes. In: Bjork E.L., and Bjork R.A. (Eds). Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Memory (1996), Academic Press 197-236
15. Godden D.R., and Baddeley A.D. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br. J. Psychol. 66 (1975) 325-331
16. Eich J.E. The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval. Mem. Cognit. 8 (1980) 157-173
17. Kent C., and Lamberts K. The encoding-retrieval relationship: retrieval as mental simulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12 (2008) 92-98
18. Altmann G.T., and Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73 (1999) 247-264
19. Kamide Y., et al. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. J. Mem. Lang. 49 (2003) 133-156
20. Altmann G.T., and Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. J. Mem. Lang. 57 (2007) 502-518
21. Kennedy A., and Murray W.S. Spatial coordinates and reading: comments on monk (1985). Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 39A (1987) 649-656
22. Inhoff A.W., and Weger U.W. Memory for word location during reading: eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise. Mem. Cognit. 33 (2005) 447-461
23. Laeng B., and Teodorescu D.S. Eye scanpaths during visual imagery re-enact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cogn. Sci. 26 (2002) 207-231
24. O'Regan J.K. Solving the 'real' mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. Can. J. Psychol. 46 (1992) 461-488
25. O'Regan J.K., and Nöe A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24 (2001) 939-1011
26. Jackendoff R. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In: Bloom P., et al. (Ed). Language and Space (1996), MIT Press 1-30
27. Knoeferle P., and Crocker M.W. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: evidence from eye movements. J. Mem. Lang. 57 (2007) 519-543
28. Horowitz T.S., and Thornton I.M. Objects or locations in vision for action? Evidence from the MILO task. Vis. Cogn. 16 (2008) 486-513
29. Pylyshyn Z. Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Vis. Cogn. 11 (2004) 801-822
30. Pylyshyn Z. Situating vision in the world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 197-207
31. Scholl B.J. Tracking multiple objects through occlusion: clues to visual objecthood. Cognit. Psychol. 38 (2001) 259-290
32. Zelinsky G.J., and Neider M.B. An eye movement analysis of multiple object tracking in a realistic environment. Vis. Cogn. 16 (2008) 553-566
33. Hommel B. Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 494-500
34. Kahneman D., et al. The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognit. Psychol. 24 (1992) 175-219
35. Henderson J.M. Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123 (1994) 410-426
36. Gordon R.D., and Irwin D.E. What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Percept. Psychophys. 58 (1996) 1260-1277
37. Mitroff, S.R. et al. Staying in bounds: contextual constraints on object file coherence. Vis. Cogn. (in press)
38. Kolers P.A. Pattern-analyzing memory. Science 191 (1976) 1280-1281
39. Ballard D.H., et al. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 20 (1997) 723-767
40. Rensink R. The dynamic representation of scenes. Vis. Cogn. 7 (2000) 17-42
41. Grimes J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In: Akins K. (Ed). Perception: Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science Vol. 5 (1996), Oxford University Press 89-110
42. Henderson J.M., and Hollingworth A. The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychol. Sci. 10 (1999) 438-443
43. Rensink R.A., et al. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci. 8 (1997) 368-373
44. Ballard D.H., et al. Memory representations in natural tasks. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 7 (1995) 66-80
45. Gajewski D.A., and Henderson J.M. Minimal use of working memory in a scene comparison task. Vis. Cogn. 12 (2005) 979-1002
46. Henderson J.M., and Castelhano M.S. Eye movements and visual memory for scenes. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance (2005), Oxford University Press 213-235
47. Clark, A. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press (in press)
48. Castelhano M.S., and Henderson J.M. Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Vis. Cogn. 12 (2005) 1017-1040
49. Williams C.C., et al. Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 67 (2005) 816-827
50. Hayhoe M., et al. Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Res. 38 (1998) 125-137
51. Hayhoe M., and Ballard D. Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 188-193
52. Hollingworth A. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32 (2006) 58-69
53. Hollingworth A. Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29 (2003) 388-403
54. Hollingworth A. Memory for object position in natural scenes. Vis. Cogn. 12 (2005) 1003-1016