The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference

Cognition

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 831-836

  Heller, Daphna ^a   Grodner, Daniel ^a,b   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Common ground; Eye tracking; Language; Perspective; Reference resolution

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INTENTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIZE PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 51249116652     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. (2002), John Wiley and Sons Inc, New Jersey
2. Brown-Schmidt S., Gunlogson C., and Tanenhaus M.K. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition 107 (2008) 1122-1134
3. Clark H.H., and Marshall C.R. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Joshi A.H., Webber B., and Sag I.A. (Eds). Elements of discourse understanding (1981), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 10-63
4. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 6 (1974) 84-107
5. Eberhard K.M., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Sedivy J.C., and Tanenhaus M.K. Eye-movements as a window into spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 (1995) 409-436
6. Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J. (in press). The effects of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. In N. Pearlmutter & E. Gibson (Eds), The processing and acquisition of reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Hanna J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., and Trueswell J.C. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 43-61
8. Hanna J.E., and Tanenhaus M.K. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 28 (2004) 105-115
9. Jaeger, T. F. (in press). Better categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language.
10. Keysar B., Barr D.J., Balin J.A., and Brauner J.S. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 32-37
11. Keysar B., Lin S., and Barr D.J. Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition 89 (2003) 25-41
12. Matin E., Shao K., and Boff K. Saccadic overhead: Information processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics 53 (1993) 372-380
13. Nadig A.S., and Sedivy J.C. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 329-336
14. Sedivy J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Chambers C.G., and Carlson G.N. Achieving incremental processing through contextual representation: Evidence from the processing of adjectives. Cognition 71 (1999) 109-147
15. Sedivy J.C. Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 (2003) 3-23
16. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., and Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268 (1995) 1632-1634
17. Wardlow Lane L., Groisman M., and Ferreira V.S. Don't talk about pink elephants! Speakers' control over leaking private information during language production. Psychological Science 17 4 (2006) 273-277
18. Wu S., and Keysar B. The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 600-606