Trajectories Emerging From Discrete Versus Continuous Processing Models in Phonological Competitor Tasks: A Commentary on Spivey, Grosjean, and Knoblich (2005)

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 588-594

  van der Wel, Robrecht P R D ^a   Eder, Jeffrey R ^a   Mitchel, Aaron D ^a   Walsh, Matthew M ^b   Rosenbaum, David A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

discrete versus continuous; motor control; movement trajectories; phonological processing; psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TOOL USE;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 65349103893     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.2.588     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Flash T., and Henis E. Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3 3 (1991) 220-230
2. Flash T., and Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (1985) 1688-1703
3. Fodor J.A. The modularity of mind (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Forster K. Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In: Cooper W.E., and Walker E.C.T. (Eds). Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (1979), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 27-85
5. Frazier L., and Clifton C. Construal (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Gaskell M.G., and Marslen-Wilson W.D. Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (1997) 613-656
7. Henis E.A., and Flash T. Mechanisms underlying the generation of averaged modified trajectories. Biological Cybernetics 72 (1995) 407-419
8. Jusczyk P., and Luce P.A. Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Past and present. Ear & Hearing 23 (2002) 1-40
9. Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N., and Dahan D. The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2003) 202-227
10. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 25 (1987) 71-102
11. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18 (1986) 1-86
12. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52 (1994) 189-234
13. Spivey M.J., Grosjean M., and Knoblich G. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 29 (2005) 10393-10398
14. Spivey M., and Marian V. Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 281-284