Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1108-1117

  Salverda, Anne Pier ^a   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Orthography; Phonology; Spoken word recognition; Visual world paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77956545786     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019901     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:419-439.
2. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:577-609.
3. Chereau C., Gaskell M.G., Dumay N. Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition 2007, 102:341-360.
4. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
5. Creel S.C., Aslin R.N., Tanenhaus M.K. Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access. Cognition 2008, 106:633-664.
6. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:453-459.
7. Donnenwerth-Nolan S., Tanenhaus M.K., Seidenberg M.S. Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1981, 7:170-180.
8. Elman J.L. An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:301-306.
9. Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:825-850.
10. Francis W.N., Kučera H. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar 1982, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
11. Frost R., Ziegler J.C. Speech and spelling interaction: The interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics 2007, 107-118. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. M.G. Gaskell (Ed.).
12. Glenberg A.M. Language and action: Creating sensible combinations of ideas. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics 2007, 361-370. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. M.G. Gaskell (Ed.).
13. Goldinger S.D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 1998, 105:251-279.
14. Hallett P.E. Eye movements. Handbook of perception and human performance 1986, 10.1-10.112. Wiley, New York, NY. K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J.P. Thomas (Eds.).
15. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111:662-720.
16. Hauk O., Johnsrude I., Pulvermüller F. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 2004, 41:301-307.
17. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:985-1018.
18. Huettig F., McQueen J.M. The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:460-482.
19. Jaeger T.F. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformed or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:434-446.
20. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101:676-703.
21. Martin A., Chao L.L. Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2001, 11:194-201.
22. McMurray B., Clayards M.A., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:1064-1071.
23. McMurray B., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition 2002, 86:B33-B42.
24. McQueen J.M., Viebahn M.C. Tracking the recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:661-671.
25. Pattamadilok C., Perre L., Dufau S., Ziegler J.C. On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:169-179.
26. Peereman R., Dufour S., Burt J.S. Orthographic influences in spoken word recognition: The consistency effect in semantic and gender categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:363-368.
27. Perre L., Midgley K., Ziegler J.C. When beef primes reef more than leaf: Orthographic information affects phonological priming in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:739-746.
28. Perre L., Ziegler J.C. On-line activation of orthography in spoken-word recognition. Brain Research 2008, 1188:132-138.
29. Pirog-Revill K., Aslin R.N., Tanenhaus M.K., Bavelier D. Neural correlates of partial lexical activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2008, 105:13111-13115.
30. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
31. Richardson D.C., Spivey M.J., Barsalou L.W., McRae K. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:767-780.
32. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., McQueen J.M. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 2003, 90:51-89.
33. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K., Crosswhite K., Masharov M., McDonough J. Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition. Cognition 2007, 105:466-476.
34. Seidenberg M.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1979, 5:546-554.
35. Taft M., Castles A., Davis C., Lazendic G., Nguyen-Hoan M. Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:366-379.
36. Tanenhaus M.K., Carlson G.N., Trueswell J.C. The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1989, 4:211-234.
37. Tanenhaus M.K., Flanigan H.P., Seidenberg M.S. Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition 1980, 8:513-520.
38. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, June 16, 268:1632-1634.
39. Tyler L.K., Moss H.E. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:244-252.
40. Ziegler J.C., Ferrand L. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:683-689.