A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 603-609

  Griffin, Zenzi M ^a,b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348162704     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196521     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Version 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. BACHOUD-LÉVI, A.-C., DUPOUX, E., COHEN, L., & MEHLER, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 331-346.
3. BANSEEL, P., GRIFFIN, Z. M., & SPIELER, D. H. (2001). Epd: MatLab wave file parsing software. Available from http://oak.psych.gatech.edu/̃spieler/software.html
4. BOCK, K., HUITEMA, J. S., & GRIFFIN, Z. M. (1995). Repetition priming and the processing components of object naming. Unpublished manuscript.
5. BUTTERWORTH, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 108-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. CLARK, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
7. FERREIRA, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times to prepared utterances. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 210-233.
8. FISCHER, B. (1998). Attention in saccades. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 289-305). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. GARRETT, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. 3. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 69-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. GOLDMAN-EISLER, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.
11. GRIFFIN, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1-B14.
12. GRIFFIN, Z. M., & BOCK, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274-279.
13. GRIFFIN, Z. M., & HUITEMA, J. S. (1999). Beckman spoken picture naming norms. Available from http://langprod.cogsci.uiuc.edu/̃norms/
14. HUITEMA, J. S. (1993). Planning referential expressions in speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
15. HUITEMA, J. S. (1996). [The Huitema picture collection]. Unpublished raw data.
16. KEMPEN, G., & HOENKAMP, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258.
17. KEMPEN, G., & HUIJBERS, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209.
18. KETELAARS, M. A. C., GARRY, M. I., & FRANK, I. M. (1997). On-line programming of simple movement sequences. Human Movement Science, 16, 461-483.
19. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. LINDSLEY, J. R. (1975). Producing simple utterances: How far ahead do we plan? Cognitive Psychology, 7, 1-19.
21. MARTIN, R. C., Vu, H., MILLER, M., & FREEDMAN, M. (2000, September). Working memory in language production. Paper presented at the conference on Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, Leiden.
22. MEYER, A. S., ROELOFS, A., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in picture naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 131-147.
23. MEYER, A. S., SLEIDERINK, A., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
24. MEYER, A. S., & VAN DER MEULEN, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 314-319.
25. PECHMANN, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27, 89-110.
26. POTTER, M. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966.
27. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., SCHRIJNEMAKERS, J. M. C., & GREMMEN, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 416-426.
28. ROACH, A., SCHWARTZ, M. F., MARTIN, N., GREWAL, R. S., & BRECHER, A. (1996). The Philadelphia Naming Test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121-133.
29. SMITH, M., & WHEELDON, L. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205-246.
30. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
31. SNODGRASS, J. G., & YUDITSKY, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.
32. WHEELDON, L., & LAHIRI, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 356-381.
33. ZELINSKY, G. J., & MURPHY, G. L. (2000). Synchronizing visual and language processing: An effect of object name length on eye movements. Psychological Science, 11, 125-131.
34. ZIPF, G. K. (1965). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Hafner, (Original work published 1949)