When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 341-360

  Huettig, Falk ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL THINKING; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; LEXICAL SELECTION BY COMPETITION CONCEPT; NOMENCLATURE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PICTURE NAMING TASK; PREDICTION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; ATTENTION; REACTION TIME; READING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 44649153149     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.2.341     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ABDEL RAHMAN, R., & MELINGER, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 604-614.
2. ALARIO. F.-X., SEGUI, J., & FERRAND, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 741-764.
3. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2).
4. BELKE, E., MEYER, A., & DAMIAN, M. F. (2005). Refractory effect in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 667-692.
5. BLOEM, I., & LA HEU, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 468-488.
6. BLOEM, I., VAN DEN BOOGAARD, S., & LA HEU, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 307-323.
7. CARAMAZZA, A., & COSTA, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64.
8. CARAMAZZA, A., & HILLIS, A. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26, 95-122.
9. CATTELL, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.
10. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
11. COLLINS, A. M., & QUILLIAN, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
12. COOPER, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107.
13. COSTA, A., ALARIO, F.-X., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 125-131.
14. CREE, G. S., & MCRAE, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201.
15. DAHAN, D., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453-459.
16. DAMIAN, M. F., & BOWERS, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111-117.
17. DELL, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
18. FAY, D. A., & CUTLER, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505-520.
19. FINKBEINER, M., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2006). Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006). Cortex, 42, 1032-1035.
20. GLASER, W. R., & GLASER, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
21. GRIFFIN, Z. M. (2004). Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 213-248). New York: Psychology Press.
22. GRIFFIN, Z. M., & BOCK, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 313-338.
23. HANTSCH, A., JESCHENIAK, J. D., & SCHRIEFERS, H. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 984-1000.
24. HARTSUIKER, R. J., PICKERING, M. J., & DE JONG, N. H. (2005). Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 921-932.
25. HUETTIG, F., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (2004). The on-line processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eyetracking. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), The online study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 187-207). New York: Psychology Press.
26. HUETTIG, F., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23-B32.
27. HUETTIG, F., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition, 15, 985-1018.
28. HUETTIG, F., & MCQUEEN, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory & Language, 57, 460-482.
29. HUETTIG, F., QUINLAN, P. T., MCDONALD, S. A., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (2006). Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica, 121, 65-80.
30. INDEFREY, P., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
31. KLOPFER, D. S. (1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science, 7, 150-157.
32. LA HEIJ, W., HEIKOOP, K. W., AKERBOOM, S., & BLOEM, I. (2003). Picture naming in picture context: Semantic interference or semantic facilitation? Psychology Science, 45, 49-62.
33. LA HEIJ, W., KUIPERS, J.-R., & STARREVELD, P. A. (2006). In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex, 42, 1028-1031.
34. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
35. LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A., & MEYER, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
36. MAHON, B. Z., COSTA, A., PETERSON, R., VARGAS, K. A., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 503-533.
37. MCDONALD, S. A. (2000). Environmental determinants of lexical processing effort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved December 10, 2004, from www.inf.ed.ac.uk/ publications/thesis/online/IP000007.pdf.
38. MEYER, A. S. (2004). The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 191-212). New York: Psychology Press.
39. MEYER, A. S., SLEIDERINK, A. M., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
40. MIOZZO, M., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2003). When more is less: A counter-intuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-258.
41. MORSELLA, E., & MIOZZO, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 555-563.
42. PETERSON, R. R., & SAVOY, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological coding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 539-557.
43. ROELOFS, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
44. ROELOFS, A. (1993). Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs. Cognition, 47, 59-87.
45. ROELOFS, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
46. ROELOFS, A. (2001). Set size and repetition matter: Comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000). Cognition, 80, 283-290.
47. ROELOFS, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
48. SCHRIEFERS, H., MEYER, A. S., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time-course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 86-102.
49. SEVERENS, E., VAN LOMMEL, S., RATINCKX, E., & HARTSUIKER, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 199, 159-187.
50. STARREVELD, P. A., & LA HEIJ, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 686-698.
51. STARREVELD, P. A., & LA HEIJ, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 896-918.
52. TANENHAUS, M. K., SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M. J., EBERHARD, K. M., & SEDIVY, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
53. VAN DER MEULEN, F. F., MEYER, A. S., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (2001). Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition, 29, 512-521.
54. VAN OVERSCHELDE, J. P., RAWSON, K. A., & DUNLOSKY, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 289-335.
55. VIGLIOCCO, G., VINSON, D. P., LEWIS, W., & GARRETT, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422-488.