Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 698-708

  Kumada, Takatsune ^a  

^a NATL INST BIOSCI HUM TECHNOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035349167     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194430     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BROADBENT, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
2. COHEN, A., & MAGEN, H. (1999). Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
3. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
4. DUNCAN, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention & performance XI (pp. 85-106) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. FOUND, A., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
6. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & BURKELL, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 510-522.
7. KUMADA, T. (1999). Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 61-79.
8. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 357-366.
9. MÜLLER, H. J., HELLER, D., & ZIEGLER, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
10. NOTHDURFT, H.-C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 355-375.
11. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
12. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
13. TREISMAN, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
14. TREISMAN, A., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
15. TREISMAN, A., & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
16. TRICK, L. M., & ENNS, J. T. (1997). Measuring preattentive processes: When is pop-out not enough? Visual Cognition, 4, 164-205.
17. TRICK, L. M., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 331-351.
18. TRICK, L. M., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
19. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
20. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.