Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 419-439

  Allopenna, Paul D ^a   Magnuson, James S ^a   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001183904     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andruski J. E., Blumstein S. E., Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition. 52:1994;163-187.
2. Connine C. M., Blasko D. G., Titone D. Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1993;193-210.
3. Cutler, A. 1995, Spoken word recognition and production, Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 11. Speech, language, and communication, 97, 136, San Diego, Academic Press.
4. Goldinger S. D., Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language. 28:1989;508-518.
5. Grosjean F. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics. 28:1980;267-283.
6. Kucera, F. Francis, W. 1967, A computational analysis of present day American English, Providence, RI, Brown University Press.
7. Luce, P. A. Pisoni, D. B. Goldinger, S. D. 1990, Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words, G. T. M. Altmann, Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives, 122, 147, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
8. Luce, R. D. 1959, Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis, New York, Wiley.
9. Marslen-Wilson W. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition. 25:1987;71-102.
10. Marslen-Wilson, W. 1989, Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning, W. Marslen-Wilson, Lexical representation and process, 3, 24, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
11. Marslen-Wilson W., Moss H. E., van Halen S. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;1376-1392.
12. Marslen-Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions during word-recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology. 10:1978;29-63.
13. Marslen-Wilson W., Zwitserlood P. Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;576-585.
14. Matin E., Shao K. C., Boff K. R. Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics. 53:1993;372-380.
15. McClelland J. L., Elman J. L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86.
16. McRae K., Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Tanenhaus M. K. Modeling thematic fit (and other constraints) within an integration competition framework. Journal of Memory and Language. 38:1998;283-312.
17. Norris, D. 1990, A dynamic-net model of human speech recognition, G. T. M. Altmann, Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
18. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition. 52:1994;189-234.
19. Nusbaum, H. C. Pisoni, D. B. Davis, C. K. 1984, Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words, Bloomington, IN, Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology.
20. Shillcock, R. 1990, Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech, G. T. M. Altmann, Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
21. Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. Tanenhaus, M. K. Integration of visual and linguistic information in resolving temporary lexical and structural ambiguities.
22. Spivey-Knowlton, M. K. 1996, Integration of visual and linguistic information: Human data and model simulations, University of Rochester, Rochester.
23. Tabossi P., Burani C., Scott D. Word identification in fluent speech. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;440-467.
24. Tanenhaus, M. K. Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. 1996, Eye-tracking, F. GrosjeanU. Frauenfelder, Language and Cognitive Processes: A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms, 11, 583, 588.
25. Tanenhaus M. K., Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Eberhard K. M., Sedivy J. C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 268:1995;632-634.
26. Tanenhaus, M. K. Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. Eberhard, K. M. Sedivy, J. C. 1996, Using eye-movements to study spoken language comprehension: Evidence for visually-mediated incremental interpretation, T. InuiJ. L. McClelland, Attention and performance, XVI, 457, 458, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
27. Tyler L. The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Perception and Psychophysics. 36:1984;417-427.
28. Vivianni, P. 1990, Eye movements in visual search: Cognitive, perceptual, and motor control aspects, E. Kowler, Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. Reviews of oculomotor research V4, 353, 383, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
29. Zwitserlood P. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition. 32:1989;25-64.
30. Zwitserlood P. Form priming. Language and Cognitive Processes. 11:1996;589-596.