A Case for Inhibition: Visual Attention Suppresses the Processing of Irrelevant Objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 116-130

  Wühr, Peter ^a   Frings, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

facilitation; inhibition; object based attention; Stroop effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 39449108314     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.116     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allport A. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In: Heuer H., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Perspectives on perception and action (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 395-419
2. Behrmann M., Zemel R.S., and Mozer M.C. Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1011-1036
3. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., and Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 539-546
4. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
5. Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. Inhibitory processes in perceptual recognition: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 327-357
6. Dalrymple-Alford E.C., and Budayr B. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills 23 (1966) 1211-1214
7. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1984) 501-517
8. Eriksen B.A., and Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16 (1974) 143-149
9. Found A., and Müller H.J. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996) 88-101
10. Fox E. Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2 (1995) 145-173
11. Frings C., and Wentura D. Negative priming is stronger for task relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in selective ignoring of distractor information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 683-693
12. Frings C., and Wentura D. Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 854-864
13. Frings C., and Wühr P. Prime-display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks. Memory & Cognition 35 (2007) 504-513
14. Greenhouse S.W., and Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24 (1959) 95-112
15. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., and Vu K.-P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 68 (2004) 1-17
16. Houghton G., and Tipper S.P. A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 53-112
17. Houghton G., Tipper S.P., Weaver B., and Shore D.I. Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition 3 (1996) 119-164
18. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In: Long J.B., and Baddeley A. (Eds). Attention & performance IX (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 187-203
19. Kahneman D., and Henik A. Perceptual organization and attention. In: Kubovy M., and Pomerantz J.R. (Eds). Perceptual organization (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 181-211
20. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald III A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., and Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303 (2004, February 13) 1023-1026
21. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-147
22. Klein R.M., and Taylor T.L. Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 113-150
23. Kunde W., and Wühr P. Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition 34 (2006) 356-367
24. Lowe D.G. Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition. Memory & Cognition 7 (1979) 382-389
25. MacLeod C.M., Dodd M.D., Sheard E.D., Wilson D.E., and Bibi U. In opposition to inhibition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 43 (2003) 163-214
26. MacLeod C.M., and MacDonald P.A. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 383-391
27. Milliken B., Joordens S., Merikle P.M., and Seiffert A.E. Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 203-229
28. Moore C.M. Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone?. Perception & Psychophysics 56 (1994) 133-147
29. Neill W.T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 444-450
30. Neill W.T., and Mathis K.M. Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 38 (1998) 1-44
31. Neill W.T., and Valdes L.A. Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 565-576
32. Notebaert W., Gevers W., Verbruggen F., and Liefooghe B. Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 112-117
33. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., and Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401 (1999, October 7) 584-587
34. Park J., and Kanwisher N. Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 613-623
35. Posner M.I., and Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds). Attention & performance X: Control of language processes (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 531-556
36. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S., and Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2 (1985) 211-228
37. Pratt J., Spalek T.M., and Bradshaw F. The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 730-746
38. Rothermund K., Wentura D., and De Houwer J. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 482-495
39. Scholl B.J. Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition 80 (2001) 1-46
40. Stürmer B., and Leuthold H. Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research 153 (2003) 35-44
41. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schröter H., and Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 1345-1363
42. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 37 A (1985) 571-590
43. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 54 A (2001) 321-343
44. Tipper S.P., and Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 37 A (1985) 591-611
45. Tipper S.P., Driver J., and Weaver B. Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 43 A (1991) 289-298
46. Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 90-122
47. Wühr P. Cueing of object orientation facilitates attentional selection of relevant objects. Spatial Vision 19 (2006) 459-477
48. Wühr P., and Ansorge U. Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 58 A (2005) 705-731
49. Wühr P., and Waszak F. Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 983-994
50. Wühr P., and Weltle M. Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 676-680