The old and thee, uh, new: Disfluency and reference resolution

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 578-582

  Arnold, Jennifer E ^a   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^a   Altmann, Rebecca J ^a   Fagnano, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; TIME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 4544266878     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allopenna, P.D., Magnuson, J.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
2. Arnold, J.E., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (in press). Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. In E. Gibson & N. Perlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bailey, K.C.D., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Disfluencies influence syntactic; parsing. Journal of Memory and language, 49, 183-200.
4. Barr, D.J. (2001a, November). Paralinguistic correlates of discourse structure. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
5. Barr, D.J. (2001b). Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. In C. Cavé, I. Guaïtella, & S. Santi (Eds.), Oralité et geslualitét Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp. 597-600). Paris: L'Harmattan.
6. Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Cregory, M., & Gildea, D. (2003). Effects of disfiuencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1001-1024.
7. Brennan, S.E. (1995). Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 102, 137-167.
8. Brennan, S.E., & Schober, M.E. (2001). How listeners compensatc for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274-296.
9. Chafe, W.L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-56). New York: Academic Press.
10. Chafe, W.L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
11. Clark, H.H., & Fox Tree, J.E. (2002). Using uh and am in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
12. Clark, H.H., & Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 201-242.
13. Dahan, D., Magnuson, J.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317-367.
14. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Chambers, C.G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 292-314.
15. Ferreira, F., & Bailey, K.G.D. (2004). Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 231-237.
16. Fox Tree, J.E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions un the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709-738.
17. Fox Tree, J.E. (2001). Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 320-326.
18. Fox Tree, J.E., & Clark, H.H. (1997). Pronouncing "the" as ''thee" to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 62, 151-167.
19. Gordon, P.C., Grosz, B.J., & Gilliom, L.A. (1993). Pronouns, names, und the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.
20. Haviland, S.E., & Clark, H.H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
21. MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 1014, 676-703.
22. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
23. Prince, E.F. (1992). The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In. W.C. Mann & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text (pp. 295-325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Rosaion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2001). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object database: Color and texture improve object recognition. Journal of Vision, 1, Abstract 413. Retrieved April 19, 2003, from http://journalofvision. org/1/3/413, DOI 10.1167/1.3.413
25. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
26. Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 632-634.
27. Tanenhaus, M.K., & Trueswell, J.C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In. J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), The handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 11 (pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.