Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 494-503

  Meyer, Antje S ^a   Damian, Markus F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LATENT PERIOD; LEXICAL ACCESS; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 34447306918     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193289     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. BELKE, A. S., MEYER, A. S., & DAMIAN, M. (2005). Refractoriness in the semantic system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 667-692.
2. BLOEM, I., & LA HEIJ, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 468-488.
3. BLOEM, I., VAN DEN BOOGARD, S., & LA HEIJ, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 307-323.
4. BROWN, R., & MCNEILL, D. (1966). The "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
5. BUTTERWORTH, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representations and process (pp. 108-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. CARAMAZZA, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are mere in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
7. CARAMAZZA, A., BI, Y. C., COSTA, A., & MIOZZO, M. (2004). What determines the speed of lexical access: Homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 278-282.
8. CARAMAZZA, A., COSTA, A., MIOZZO, M., & BI, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1430-1450.
9. CHOLIN, J., SCHILLER, N. O., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 47-61.
10. COLLINS, A. F., & ELLIS, A. W. (1992). Phonological priming of lexical retrieval in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 375-388.
11. COSTA, A., CARAMAZZA, A., & SEBASTIÁ N-GALLÉS, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1283-1296.
12. COSTA, A., SANTESTEBAN, M., & CAÑO, A. (2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain & Language, 94, 94-103.
13. DAMIAN, M. F., & BOWERS, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111-117.
14. DAMIAN, M. F., & MARTIN, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 345-361.
15. DELL, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
16. DELL, G. S., BURGER, L. K., & SVEC, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-147.
17. DELL, G. S., & REICH, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
18. FERREIRA, V. S., & GRIFFIN, Z. M. (2003). Phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection. Psychological Science, 14, 86-90.
19. FODOR, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. GARRETT, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 177-230). New York: Academic Press.
21. GERMEYS, F., DE GRAEF, P., & VERFAILLIE, K. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of saccade target and flanker objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 868-883.
22. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
23. HENDERSON, J. M., & SIEFERT, A. B. C (1999). The influence of enantiomorphic transformation on transsaccadic object integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 243-255.
24. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & FORDE, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
25. HUMPHREYS, G. W., RIDDOCH, M. J., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
26. JESCHENIAK, J. D., HAHNE, A., & SCHRIEFERS, H. (2003). Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 261-276.
27. JESCHENIAK, J. D., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 824-843.
28. JESCHENIAK, J. D., MEYER, A. S., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (2003). Specific-word frequency is not all mat counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa et al. and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 432-438.
29. JESCHENIAK, J. D., & SCHRIEFERS, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1256-1273.
30. KROLL, J. F., & STEWART, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory & Language, 13, 149-174.
31. LA HEIJ, W., HOOGLANDER, A., KERLING, R., & VAN DER VELDEN, E. (1996). Nonverbal context effects in forward and backward word translation: Evidence for conceptual mediation. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 648-665.
32. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232.
34. LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A., & MEYER, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
35. LEVELT, W. J. M., SCHRIEFERS, H., VORBERG, D., MEYER, A. S., PECHMANN, T., & HAVINGA, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
36. MACKAY, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer.
37. MEYER, A. S. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 524-545.
38. MEYER, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 69-89.
39. MEYER, A. S., & BELKE, E. (in press). Word form retrieval in language production. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. MEYER, A. S., & SCHRIEFERS, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
41. MIOZZO, M., JACOBS, M. L., & SINGER, N. J. W. (2004). The representation of homophones: Evidence from anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 840-866.
42. MORGAN, J. L., & MEYER, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 428-442.
43. MORSELLA, E., & MIOZZO, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 555-563.
44. NAVARRETE, E., & COSTA, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 359-377.
45. PETERSON, R. R., & SAVOY, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 539-557.
46. RAPP, B., & GOLDRICK, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
47. RATCLIFF, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
48. RENSINK, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
49. ROELOFS, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
50. ROELOFS, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
51. ROELOFS, A. (2002). Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 465-483.
52. ROELOFS, A. (2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory & Cognition, 32, 212-222.
53. SCHRIEFERS, H., MEYER, A. S., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 86-102.
54. SEVALD, C. A., & DELL, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91-127.
55. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
56. STEMBERGER, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
58. VIGLIOCCO, G., ANTONINI, T., & GARRETT, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317.
59. WILSHIRE, C. E., & SAFFRAN, E. M. (2005). Contrasting effects of phonological priming in aphasic word production. Cognition, 95, 31-71.