Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 428-442

  Morgan, Jane L ^a   Meyer, Antje S ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Homophones; Object naming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SEMANTICS; VISUAL FIELD;

ATTENTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 20444449340     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.428     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264.
2. Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (in press). Refractoriness in the semantic system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
3. Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488.
4. Bock, K. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin A. Review, 3, 395-421.
5. Bock, K., Irwin, D. E., Davidson, D. J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Minding the clock. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 653-685.
6. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2004). Beyond binary judgment: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1-11.
7. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
8. Caramazza, A., Bi, Y., Costa, A., & Miozzo, C. (2004). What determines the speed of lexical access: Homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jeschniak et al. (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 278-282.
9. Caramazza, A.. Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1430-1451.
10. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. (1999). Memory for relational information across eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 919-934.
11. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1995). Memory for structural information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1441-1458.
12. Cave, K. R., & Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 204-223.
13. Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 178- 198.
14. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-339.
15. Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111-117.
16. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
17. Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-147.
18. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
19. Ferreira, F. (2000). Syntax in language production: An approach using tree-adjoining grammars. In L. R. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 291-330). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
20. Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57-84.
21. Ferreira, V. S., & Griffin, Z. M. (2003). Phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection. Psychological Science, 14, 86-90.
22. Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1187-1199.
23. Germeys, F., de Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of saccade target and flanker objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 868-883.
24. Gilman, E., & Underwood, G. (2003). Restricting the field of view to investigate the perceptual spans of pianists. Visual Cognition, 10, 201-232.
25. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
26. Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 136-150.
27. Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1-B14.
28. Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 603-609.
29. Griffin, Z. M. (2004). Why look? Reasons for speech-related eye movements. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: What we can learn from free-viewing eye tracking (pp. 213-247). New York: Psychology Press.
30. Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274-279.
31. Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
32. Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 826-839.
33. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
34. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201-221.
35. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
36. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196-208.
37. Henderson, J. M., & Siefert, A. B. C. (1999). The influence of enantiomorphic transformation on transsaccadic object integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 243-255.
38. Henderson, J. M., & Siefert, A. B. C. (2001). Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: Effects of spatial position and left-right orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin A Review, 8, 753-760.
39. Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
40. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
41. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
42. Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, T. (1975). Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 255-260.
43. Irwin, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
44. Irwin, D. E. (2004). Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processes. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: What we can learn from free-viewing eye tracking (pp. 105-133). New York: Psychology Press.
45. Irwin, D. E., & Gordon, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
46. Jerger, S., Martin, R., C., & Damian, M., F. (2002). Semantic and phonological influences on picture naming by children and teenagers. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 229-249.
47. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word-frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
48. Jescheniak, J. D., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa et al. and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 432-438.
49. Job, R., & Tenconi, E. (2002). Naming pictures at no costs: Asymmetries in picture and word conditional naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 790-794.
50. Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 113-139.
51. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
52. Kanwisher, N., & Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes, and visual attention: Which, what, and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 26-31.
53. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade-off. In C. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149-223). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
54. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 429-455.
55. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232.
56. Levelt, W. J. M.. & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 433-452.
57. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in language production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
58. Liversedge, S. P., & Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movement and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6-14.
59. Lupker, S. J., Kinoshita, S., Coltheart, M., & Taylor, T. E. (2003). Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures, and sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 556-575.
60. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of effective stimulus processing during a fixation in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 563-581.
61. Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477-496.
62. Meyer, A. S., & Dobel, C. (2003). Application of eye tracking in speech production research. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 253-272). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
63. Meyer, A. S., & Lethaus, F. (2004). The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: What we can leant from free-viewing eye tracking (pp. 191-211). New York: Psychology Press.
64. Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in picture naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 131-147.
65. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
66. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
67. Meyer, A. S., & van der Meulen, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming of picture viewing and picture naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 314-319
68. Meyer, A. S., van der Meulen, F. F., & Brooks, A. (2004). Eye movements during speech planning: Speaking about present and remembered objects. Visual Cognition, 11, 553-576.
69. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
70. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In O. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
72. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 199-210.
73. Radach, R., Heller, D., & Inhoff, A. W. (2003). A comparison of silent and oral reading. In Abstracts of the 44th Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Abstract No. 4074, p. 94.
74. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
75. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
76. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
77. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
78. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
79. Reichte, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z-Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
80. Rensink, R. A. (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
81. Rensink, R. A. (2000b). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
82. Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205-246.
83. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995, June 16). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
84. Truitt, F. E., Clifton, C., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1997). The perceptual span and the eye-hand span in sight-reading music. Visual Cognition, 4, 143-161.
85. Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101-175.
86. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.