The computer-mediated communication (CMC) classroom: A challenge of medium, presence, interaction, identity, and relationship

Communication Education

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 497-523

  Sherblom, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956954571     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2010.486440     Document Type: Article

References (217)

1. Acar, A. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of online social networking behavior: The case of Facebook. Journal of Website Promotion, 3, 62-83.
2. Allen, T. H. (2006). Is the rush to provide on-line instruction setting our students up for failure? Communication Education, 55, 122-126.
3. An, Y. J., & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, article 5. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/an.html
4. Anderson, T. L., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57, 153-172.
5. Antonijevic, S. (2008). From text to gesture online: A microethnographic analysis of nonverbal communication in the Second Life virtual environment. Information Communication & Society, 11, 221-238.
6. Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 42-54.
7. Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., & Guadagno, R. E. (2008). Transformed social interaction in mediated interpersonal communication. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, & S. B. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 77-99). New York: Routledge.
8. Balakrishnan, B., Nikolic, D., & Zikic, N. (2007, May). "Where am I? Impact of display and content variables on spatial presence and comprehension in virtual environments. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, San Francisco, CA.
9. Bates, M. C. (2009). Persistent rhetoric for persistent worlds: The mutability of the self in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 26, 1020-1117.
10. Beers-Fägersten, K. (2010). Using discourse analysis to assess social co-presence in the video conference environment. In Shedletsky, L., & Aitken, J. E. (Eds.), Cases on online discussion and interaction: Experiences and outcomes. (pp. 175-193) Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
11. Bejerano, A. R. (2008). Raising the question #11 the genesis and evolution of online degree programs: Who are they for and what have we lost along the way? Communication Education,57,408-414.
12. Benoit, P. J., Benoit, W. L., Milyo, J., & Hansen, G. J. (2006). The effects of traditional vs. web-assisted instruction on student learning and satisfaction. Columbia, MO: The Graduate School, University of Missouri.
13. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. L. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
14. Biocca, F., Burgoon, J. K., Harms, C., & Stoner, M. (2001). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Retrieved from http://www.mindlab.org
15. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Towards a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Retrieved from http://www.mindlab.org.
16. Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2009). Meaning-making as dialogic process: Official and carnival lives in the language classroom. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 8, 236-253.
17. Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system. Information Communication & Society, 11, 490-508.
18. Boostrom, R. (2008). The social construction of virtual reality and the stigmatized identity of the newbie. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1, Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org/
19. Boras, S. D. (2009, February). Lost in translation: Regulation of the situated self in an age of digital discourse. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention. Phoenix, AZ.
20. Boster, F. J., Meyer, G. S., Roberto, A. J., Inge, C., & Strom, R. (2006). Some effects of video streaming on educational achievement. Communication Education, 55, 46-62.
21. Bunz, U., & Campbell, S. W. (2004). Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports, 21, 11-25.
22. Byron, K. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Academy of Management Review, 33, 309-327.
23. Byron, K., & Baldridge, D. C. (2007). E-mail recipients' impressions of senders' likability. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 37-160.
24. Campbell, C. (2009). Learning in a different life: Pre-service education students using an online virtual world. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org.
25. Campbell, K., & Wright, K. B. (2002). On-line support groups: An investigation of relationships among source credibility, dimensions of relational communication, and perceptions of emotional support. Communication Research Reports, 19, 183-193.
26. Campbell, S. W., & Neer, M. R. (2001). The relationship of communication apprehension and interaction involvement to perceptions of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research Reports, 18, 391-398.
27. Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction. Communication Research, 30, 625-648.
28. Caplan, S. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 234-241.
29. Caplan, S. E., & High, A. C. (2006). Beyond excessive use: The interaction between cognitive and behavioral symptoms of problematic internet use. Communication Research Reports, 23, 265-271.
30. Carpenter, II B. S.,. (2009). Virtual worlds as educational experience: Living and learning in interesting times. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org.
31. Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (2001). Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education classrooms. Communication Education, 50, 230-240.
32. Chodos, D., Naeimi, P., & Stroulia, E. (2009). An integrated framework for simulation-based training on video and in a virtual world. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org.
33. Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer- mediated communication by training. Communication Research, 30, 47-177.
34. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
35. Daniels, M. (2002). Teaching small group communication using first class software. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 32-38.
36. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83 108.
37. DeLucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of Second DMI. Computers & Education, 52, 220 -233
38. Demetrious, K. (2008). Secrecy and illusion: Second Life and the construction of unreality.Australian Journal of Communication, 35, 1-13.
39. Deutschmann, M., & Panichi, L. (2009). Talking into empty space? Signaling involvement in a virtual language classroom in Second Life. Language Awareness, 18, 310-328.
40. Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCall, 21, 18-36.
41. dos Santos, R. P. (2009). Second Life physics: Virtual, real or surreal? Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org.
42. Dresner, E., & Barak, S. (2009). Effects of visual spatial structure on textual conversational multitasking. Communication Quarterly, 57, 104-115.
43. Dsilva, M. U., Maddox, R., & Collins, B. (1998). Criticism on the internet: An analysis of participant reactions. Communication Research Reports, 15, 180-187.
44. Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 500-521.
45. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S. T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56, 255-277.
46. Eichhorn, K. C. (2008). Soliciting and providing social support over the internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 67-78.
47. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11,415-441.
48. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
49. Esteves, M., Fonseca, B., Morgado, L., & Martins, P. (2009). Using Second Life for problem based learning in computer science programming. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org.
50. Flanagin, A. J. (2005). IM online: Instant messaging use among college students. Communication Research Reports, 22, 175-187.
51. Flanagin, A. J., Tiyaamornwong, V., O'Connor, J., & Seibold, D. R. (2002). Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of member sex and anonymity. Communication Research, 29, 66-93.
52. Flowers, A., Gregson, K., & Trigilio, J. (2009, April). Web interaction from 2D to 3D: New dimensions in company stakeholder communications in Second Life. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention. Philadelphia, PA.
53. Gaimster, J. (2007). Reflections on interactions in virtual worlds and their implication for learning art and design. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6, 187-199.
54. Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I, Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 52-84.
55. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2008). Self-presentation in online personals. Communication Research, 33, 152-177.
56. Gong, L., & Nass, C. (2007). When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and half- humanoid: Human identity and consistency preference. Human Communication Research, 33,163-193.
57. Grasmuck, S., Martin, J., & Zhao, S. (2009). Ethno-racial identity displays on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 158-188.
58. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites associal learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161.
59. Gudykunst, W. B., Yang, S., & Nishida, T. (1985). A cross-cultural test of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 11, 407-454.
60. Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited. Communication Research, 28, 325-347.
61. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276-297.
62. Harrison, R. (2009). Excavating Second Life: Cyber-Archaeologies, heritage and virtual communities. Journal of Material Culture, 14, 75-106.
63. Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). 'I've never clicked this much with anyone in my life': Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society, 6, 487-506.
64. Herold, D. K. (2009). Virtual Education: Teaching media studies in Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
65. Herring, S. C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media & Society, 6, 26-36.
66. Hess, A., & Stewart, K. (2009, February). Finding islands of community in a sea of commodification: A rhetorical and ludologic analysis of the public and private character of Second Life. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention, Phoenix,AZ
67. High, A., & Caplan, S. (2009). Social anxiety and computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: Implications for the hyperpersonal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior,25,475-482.
68. Ho, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190 -207.
69. Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51, 1755-1765.
70. Hudson, K., & Degast-Kennedy, K. (2009). Canadian border simulation at Loyalist College. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(1). Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
71. Jang, S. (2009). Exploration of secondary students' creativity by integrating web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum. Computer & Education, 52, 247-255.
72. Jarmon, L. (2009). An ecology of embodied interaction: Pedagogy and homo virtualis. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(1). Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
73. Jarmon, L., Lim, K. Y. T., & Carpenter, II, B. S. (2009). Introduction: Pedagogy, education and innovation in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http:// jvwresearch.org
74. Jenks, C. J. (2009). Getting acquainted in skypecasts: Aspects of social organization in online chat rooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 26-46.
75. Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. American Journal of Distance Education, 17, 25-43.
76. Keaten, J. A., & Kelly, L. (2008). "Re: We really need to talk": Affect for communication channels, competence, and fear of negative evaluation. Communication Quarterly, 56, 407 -426.
77. Kim, J. (2002, October). Interpersonal interaction in computer mediated communication (CMC): Exploratory qualitative research based on critical review of existing theories. Paper presented at the International Communication Association convention, Seoul, Korea.
78. Kingsley, J., & Wankel, C. (2009). Introduction. In C. Wankel & J. Kingsley (Eds.), Higher education in virtual worlds: Teaching and learning in Second Life (pp. 1-9). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
79. Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). Online 'chat' facilities as pedagogic tools. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6, 145-159.
80. Knopf, C. M. (2009, April). When the going green gets tough: Environmental action, transgressions, and online confessions. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention. Philadelphia, PA.
81. Kock, N. (2004). The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15, 327-348.
82. Kuehn, S. A. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43, 171-183.
83. Lane, D. R., & Shelton, M. W. (2001). The centrality of communication education in classroom computer-mediated-communication: Toward a practical and evaluative pedagogy. Communication Education, 50, 241-255.
84. LaRose, R., Eastin, M. S., & Gregg, J. (2001). Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior, 1. Retrieved from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n2/paradox.html
85. Laverie, D. A., & McDonald, R. E. (2007). Volunteer dedication: Understanding the role of identity importance on participation frequency. Journal of Macromarketing, 27, 274-288.
86. Lazzari, M. (2009). Creative use of podcasting in higher education and its effect on competitive agency. Computers & Education, 52, 27-34.
87. Lee, E. (2004). Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 30, 234-259.
88. Lee, E. (2005). Effects of the influence agent's sex and self-confidence on informational social influence in computer-mediated communication: Quantitative versus verbal presentation. Communication Research, 32, 29-58.
89. Lee, E. (2007). Effects of gendered language on gender stereotyping in computer-mediated communication: The moderating role of depersonalization and gender-role orientation. Human Communication Research, 33, 515-535.
90. Lee, E., & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 28, 349-381.
91. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50.
92. Lee, P. D. (2009). Using Second Life to teach operations management. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
93. Leiner, D. J., & Quiring, O. (2008). What interactivity means to the user: Essential insights into and a scale for perceived interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 127-155.
94. Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1988). The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Executive, 2, 225-232.
95. Leonard, L. G., Withers, L. A., & Sherblom, J. C. (2010). The paradox of computer-mediated communication and identity: Peril, promise and Second Life. In J. Park & E. Abel (Eds.), Interpersonal relations and social patterns in communication technologies: Discourse norms, language structures and cultural variables. (pp. 1-17) Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
96. Levine, S. J. (2007). The online discussion board. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 113, 67-74.
97. Light, V., Nesbitt, E., Light, P., & Burns, J. R. (2000). 'Let's you and me have a little discussion': Computer mediated communication in support of campus-based university courses. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 85-96.
98. Lim, K. (2009). The six learnings of second life: A framework for designing curricular interventions in-world. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
99. Lira, E. M., Ripoll, P., Peiro, J. M., & Zornoza, A. M. (2008). The role of information and communication technologies in the relationship between group effectiveness and group potency. Small Group Research, 39, 728-745.
100. Liu, X. (2010). Empirical testing of a theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory study of educational wikis. Communication Education, 59, 52-69.
101. Martin, J. (2008). Consuming code: Use-value, exchange-value, and the role of virtual goods in Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org.
102. Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2001). Real and virtual socialties. American Behavioral Scientist, 45,552-566.
103. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll see you on "facebook": The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1-17.
104. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105. Meadows, M. S. (2008). I, avatar. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
106. Messinger, P. R., Ge, X., Stroulia, E., Lyons, K., & Smirnov, K. (2008). On the relationship between my avatar and myself. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
107. Michinov, N., Michinov, E., & Toczek-Capelle, M. C. (2004). Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 27-39.
108. Mo, P. K. H., Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2009). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: A systematic literature review of online health-related support groups. Patient Education and Counseling, 75, 16-24.
109. Mon, L. (2009). Questions and answers in a virtual world: Educators and librarians as information providers in Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
110. Monberg, J. (2005). Trajectories of computer-mediated communication research. Southern Communication Journal, 70, 181-186.
111. Montero-Fleta, B., Montesinos López, A., Pérez-Sabater, C., & Turney, E. (2009). Computer mediated communication and informalization of discourse: The influence of culture and subject matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 770-779.
112. Nesson, R., & Nesson, C. (2008). The case for education in virtual worlds. Space and Culture, 11, 273-284.
113. Norris, J. (2009). The growth and direction of healthcare support groups in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
114. Nov, O., & Rafaeli, S. (2009). Measuring the premium on common knowledge in computer- mediated coordination problems. Computer in Human Behavior, 25, 171-174.
115. Nowak, K. (2001). Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation. Paper presented at Presence, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? doi 10.1.1.19.5482
116. Nowak, K., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence, 12,481-494.
117. Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2006). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 153-178.
118. Orgad, S. (2005). Storytelling online: Talking breast cancer on the internet. New York: Peter Lang.
119. O'Sullivan, P. B., & Flanagin, A. J. (2003). Reconceptualizing 'flaming' and other problematic messages. New Media & Society, 5, 69-94.
120. Park, J. (2008). Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer mediated communication, part 2: An application of the theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 2199-2209.
121. Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructor's acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13, 163-186.
122. Patterson, B. R., & Gojdycz, T. K. (2000). The relationship between computer-mediated communication and communication related anxieties. Communication Research Reports, 7,278-287.
123. Pena, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2006). An analysis of socioemotional and task communication in online multiplayer video games. Communication Research, 33, 92-109.
124. Pena, J., Walther, J. B., & Hancock, J. T. (2007). Effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated groups. Communication Research, 34, 313-331.
125. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries: SIDE effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715
126. Pratt, L., Wiseman, R. L., Cody, M. J., & Wendt, P. L. (1999). Interrogative strategies and information exchange in computer-mediated communication. Communication Quarterly, 47, 46-66.
127. Rainie, L. (2006, October). Digital natives: How today's youth are different from their 'digital immigrant' elders and what that means for libraries. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet. org
128. Rainie, L. (2007a, April). The new media ecology: How the marketplace of ideas and learning is different for 'digital natives.' Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
129. Rainie, L. (2007b, February, 1). The new digital ecology: The growth and impact of the internet (and related technologies). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
130. Rainie, L.(2007c, February, 18). Communities, learning and the internet. Retrieved from http:// www.pewinternet.org
131. Rains, S. A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication. Communication Research, 34, 100-125.
132. Ramirez, A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2004). The effect of interactivity on initial interactions: The influence of information valence and modality and information richness on computer- mediated interaction. Communication Monographs, 71, 422-447.
133. Ramirez, A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213-228.
134. Ramirez, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287-310.
135. Ramirez, A., Zhang, S., McGrew, C., & Lin, S. (2007). Relational communication in computer- mediated interaction revisited: A comparison of participant-observer perspectives. Communication Monographs, 74, 492-516.
136. Rao, S., Shen, Y., & Fritz, S. (2006). Gender and the uses and gratifications of the internet among college students in China. Asian Communication Research, 9, 73-84.
137. Rice, L., & Markey, P. M. (2009). The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 35-39.
138. Robbins-Bell, S. (2008). Higher education as virtual conversation. EDUCAUSE Review, 43, 5.
139. Robinson, J. D., & Turner, J. (2003). Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal social support: Cancer and older adults. Health Communication, 15, 227-234.
140. Romano, N. C. Jr., Lowry, P. B., & Roberts, T. L. (2007). Technology-supported small group interaction. Small Group Research, 38, 3-11.
141. Rumbough, T. (2001). The development and maintenance of interpersonal relationships through computer-mediated communication. Communication Research Reports, 18, 223-229.
142. Sassenberg, K., & Boos, M. (2003). Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 405-422.
143. Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents' online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an "internet-attribute-perception" model. Media Psychology, 10, 292-315.
144. Schrire, S. (2004). Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32, 475-502.
145. Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70.
146. Schrodt, P., & Witt, P. L. (2006). Students' attributions of instructor credibility as a function of students' expectations of instructional technology use and nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 55, 1-20.
147. Schwartz, D. T. (2009). Second Life and classical music education: Developing iconography that encourages human interaction. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http:// jvwresearch.org
148. Schwartzman, R. (2006). Virtual group problem solving in the basic communication course: Lessons for online learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 3-14.
149. Scott, C. R., & Timmerman, C. E. (2005). Relating computer, communication, and computer- mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research, 32, 683-725.
150. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age. Communication Research, 32, 531-565.
151. Sherblom, J. C. (1988). Direction, function, and signature in electronic mail. The Journal of Business Communication, 25, 39-53.
152. Sherblom, J. C. (1990). Organizational involvement expressed through pronoun use in computer mediated communication. Communication Research Reports, 7, 45-50.
153. Sherblom, J. C., & Van Rheenen, D. D. (1984). Spoken language indices of uncertainty. Human Communication Research, 11, 221-230.
154. Sherblom, J. C., Withers, L. A., & Leonard, L. G. (2009, February). Interpersonal Uncertainty Reduction in Second Life. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention, Phoenix, AZ.
155. Sherblom, J. C., Withers, L. A., & Leonard, L. G. (2009). Communication challenges and opportunities for educators using Second Life. In C. Wankel & J. Kingsley (Eds.), Higher education in virtual worlds: Teaching and learning in Second Life (pp. 29-46). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
156. Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 328-347.
157. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
158. So, H. J. (2009). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 43-160.
159. Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R. A., Postmes, T., & Ter Haar, W. (2002). Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance. Small Group Research, 33, 555-574.
160. Spitzberg, B. H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) Competence. Journal of Computer mediated Communication, 11, 629-666.
161. Stephens, K. K., & Mottet, T. P. (2008). Interactivity in a web conference training context: Effects on trainers and trainees. Communication Education, 57, 88-104.
162. Stephens, K. K., Houser, M. L., & Cowan, R. L. (2009). R U able to meat me: The impact of student's overly casual email messages to instructors. Communication Education, 58, 303-326.
163. Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Predicted outcome value during initial interactions. Human Communication Research, 13, 3-33.
164. Tamborini, R., & Westerman, D. (2006, June). The effects of avatars on uncertainty reduction. Paper presented at the International Communication Association convention, Dresden,
165. Germany Taylor, P. G. (2009). Can we move beyond visual metaphors? Virtual world provocations and Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
166. Thompson, B. (2008). Characteristics of parent teacher e-mail communication. Communication Education, 57, 201-223.
167. Thompson-Hayes, M., Gibson, D., Scott, A., & Webb, L. (2009). Professorial collaborations via CMC: Interactional dialectics. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 208-216.
168. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
169. Toma, C., Hancock, J., & Ellison, N. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
170. Tong, S. T., Van der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531-549.
171. Tracy, S. J., & Trethewey, (2005). Fracturing the real-self B- fake-self dichotomy: Moving toward "crystallized" organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 15, 168-195.
172. Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding manager's media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 71 94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
173. Tudor, D. (2007, November). My avatar, myself: Remixed identity in an entrepreneurial altworld. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Chicago,IL
174. Turman, P. D., & Schrodt, P. (2005). The influence of instructional technology use on students' affect: Do course designs and biological sex make a difference? Communication Studies, 56, 109-129.
175. Umphrey, L. R., Wickersham, J. A., & Sherblom, J. C. (2008). Student perceptions of the instructor's relational characteristics, the classroom communication experience, and the interaction involvement in face-to-face and video conference instruction. Communication Research Reports., 25, 102-114.
176. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1. Retrieved from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/ utz.html
177. Utz, S. (2008). Social identification with virtual communities. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, & S. B. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 252 270). New York: Routledge.
178. Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 314-335.
179. Valenzula, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 14, 875 901.
180. Vess, D. (2005). Asynchronous discussion and communication patterns in online and hybrid history courses. Communication Education, 54, 355-364.
181. Waldeck, J. H. (2008). The development of an industry-specific online learning center: Consulting
182. Waldeck, J. H. (2008). The development of an industry-specific online learning center: Consulting lessons learned. Communication Education, 57, 452-463.
183. Waldvogel, J. (2007). Greetings and closings in workplace email. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12, 456-477.
184. Walker, R. C. (2007). An alternative construction of identity: A study of place-based identity and its implications. American Communication Journal, 9, 1-17.
185. Walker, V.L. (2009). 3D virtual learning in counselor education: Using Second Life in counselor skill development. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
186. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
187. Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
188. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20,473-501.
189. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
190. Walther, J. B. (2009). Theories, boundaries, and all of the above. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 748-752.
191. Walther, J. B. (2010). Computer-mediated communication. In C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, & D.R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), (2nd ed.), The handbook of communication science. (pp. 489 -505). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
192. Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 828-846.
193. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp and J. A. Daly (Eds.), (3rd ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
194. Walther, J. B., Gay, G., & Hancock, J. T. (2005). How do communication and technology researchers study the internet? Journal of Communication, 632-657.
195. Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 24, 36-65.
196. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
197. Walther, J. B., Van der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 36, 229-253.
198. Walther, J. B., Van der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends' appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
199. Wang, Z., Walther, J. B., & Hancock, J. (2009). Social identification and interpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication: what you do versus who you are in virtual groups. Human Communication Research, 35, 59-85.
200. Westerman, D., Tamborini, R., & Bowman, N. D. (2007, November). The effects of avatars on impression formation in different contexts. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
201. Westerman, D., Van Der Heide, B., Klein, K. A., & Walther, J. B. (2008). How do people really seek information about others?: Information seeking across internet and traditional communication channels. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 751-767.
202. Williams, D., Caplan, S., & Xiong, L. (2007). Can you hear me now? The impact of voice in an online gaming community. Human Communication Research, 33, 427-449.
203. Williams, M. (2007). Avatar watching: Participant observation in graphical online environments. Qualitative Research, 7, 5-24.
204. Witt, P. L.(2004). An initial examination of observed verbal immediacy and participants' opinions of communication effectiveness in online group interaction. Journal of Online Behavior, 2. Retrieved from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v2n1/witt.html
205. Witt, P. L., & Schrodt, P. (2006). The influence of instructional technology use and teacher immediacy on student affect for teacher and course. Communication Reports, 19, 1-15.
206. Wood, A. F., & Fassett, D. L. (2003). Remote control: Identity, power, and technology in the communication classroom. Communication Education, 52, 286-296.
207. Worley, W. L., & Tesdell, L. S. (2009). Instructor time and effort in online and face-to-face teaching: Lessons learned. IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, 52, 138-151.
208. Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2007). The relationship between computer-mediated- communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Communication Journal, 72, 355-378.
209. Wright, K. (1999). Computer-mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies. Communication Quarterly,47,402-414.
210. Wright, K. (2000). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48, 44-59.
211. Wright, K. (2002). Motives for communication within on-line support groups and antecedents for interpersonal use. Communication Research Reports, 19, 89-98.
212. Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52, 820-833.
213. Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 37-65.
214. Yildiz, S. (2009). Social presence in the web-based classroom: Implications for intercultural communication. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13, 46-65.
215. Zheng, N. (2007, May). Your world, your imagination: Community construction in online multiplayer game Second Life. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, San Francisco, CA.
216. Zielke, M. A., Roome, T. C., & Krueger, A. B. (2009). A composite adult learning model for virtual world residents with disabilities: A case study of the virtual ability Second Life island. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2. Retrieved from http://jvwresearch.org
217. Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1-34.