Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating

Communication Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 152-177

  Gibbs, Jennifer L ^a,d   Ellison, Nicole B ^b   Heino, Rebecca D ^c,e  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^e GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anticipated future interaction; Computer mediated communication; Internet relationships; Mixed mode relationships; Online dating; Online personals; Self disclosure; Self presentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 32244434329     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650205285368     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Baker, A. (2002). What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met in cyberspace. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 363-375.
2. Baker, A. (2005). Double click: Romance and commitment among online couples. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
3. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33-48.
4. Baym, N. (1998). The emergence of online community. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 35-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Baym, N. (2002). Interpersonal life online. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 62-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
7. Bose, J. (2001). Nonresponse bias analyses at the National Center for Education Statistics. Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2001. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.fcsm.gov/committees/ihsng/StatsCan2_JB.pdf
8. Brym, R.J., & Lenton, R.L. (2001). Love online: A report on digital dating in Canada. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www.nelson.com/ nelson/harcourt/sociology/newsociety3e/loveonline.pdf
9. Calabrese, R. J. (1975). The effects of privacy and probability of future interaction on initial interaction patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
10. Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4). 999-1017.
11. Clark, L. S. (1998). Dating on the Net: Teens and the rise of "pure" relationships. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 159-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Cozby, P. C. (1973). Effects of density, activity, and personality on environmental preferences. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 45-60.
13. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Derlega, V., Winstead, B., Wong, P., & Greenspan, M. (1987). Self-disclosure and relationship development: An attributional analysis. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 172-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
16. Donn, J., & Sherman, R. (2002). Attitudes and practices regarding the formation of romantic relationships on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 107-123.
17. Doring, N. (2002). Studying online love and cyber romance. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 333-356). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
18. Ellison, N. B., Heino, R. D., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 ( 2 ).
19. Fiore, A. T. & Donath, J. S. (2005). Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? Computer-Human Interaction 2005, 1371-1374.
20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
21. Greene, K., Derlega, V. L., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1268-1328.
22. Hardey, M. (2002). Life beyond the screen: Embodiment and identity through the Internet. Sociological Review, 50, 570-585.
23. Heino, R. D., Ellison, N. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (May, 2005). Are we a 'match'? Choosing partners in the online dating market. Paper presented at the International Communication Association convention, New York, NY.
24. Joinson, A. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Reciprocal self-disclosure in Internet-based surveys. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4, 587-573.
25. Kellermann, K., & Reynolds, R. (1990). When ignorance is bliss: The role of motivation to reduce uncertainty in uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 17, 5-75.
26. Laurenceau, J. P., Feldman Barrett, L., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.
27. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Levinger, G., & Senn, D. J. (1967). Disclosure of feelings in marriage. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 13, 237-249.
29. Levinger, G., & Snoek, D. J. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
30. Lynn, M., & Bolig, R. (1985). Personal advertisements: Sources of data about relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 377-383.
31. Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: The effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349-357.
32. Match.comnewscenter. (2004). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from http://corp.match.com/news_center/nc_at_a_glance.aspx
33. Markman, H. J. (1981). Prediction of marital distress: A 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554-567.
34. McAdams, D., & Vaillant, G. E. (1982). Intimacy motivation and psychosocial adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 586-593.
35. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
36. McLaughlin, M., Osbourne, K., & Ellison, N. (1997). Virtual community in a telepresence environment. In S. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 146-168). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
37. Miller, H. (June, 1995). The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the Internet. Paper presented at the Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space conference, Goldsmiths' College, University of London. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://ess.ntu.ac.uk/miller/cyberpsych/goffman.htm
38. Myers, D. (1987). "Anonymity is part of the magic": Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 251-266.
39. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97.
40. Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. (1998). "Making MOOsic": The development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537.
41. Ramirez, A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213-228.
42. Ramirez, A., & Zhang, S. (in press). When on-line meets off-line: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs.
43. Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523-563). New York: Guilford.
44. Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender switching in virtual environments on the Internet. Information, Communication, and Society, 2, 521-540.
45. Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 233-260.
46. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
47. St. John, W. (2002, April 21). Young, single and dating at hyperspeed. The New York Times. Available from http://www.nytimes.com
48. Stone, A. R. (1991). Will the real body please stand up? Boundary stories about virtual cultures. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 81-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Stone, A. R. (1996). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Predicted outcome value during initial interactions: A reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 13, 3-33.
51. Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, A. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21 (3). 361-379.
52. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
53. Taylor, D., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 257-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
55. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
56. Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51, 231-251.
57. Tuten, T. L., Urban, D. J., & Bosnjak, M. (2002). Internet surveys and data quality: A review. In B. Batinic, U. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 7-26). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
58. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1 (1). Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
59. Walther, J. B. (1992a). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-91.
60. Walther, J. B. (1992b). A longitudinal experiment on relational tone in computer-mediated and face to face interaction. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 220-231.
61. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
62. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-44.
63. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
64. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
65. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
67. Watt, J. H. (1999). Internet systems for evaluation research. In G. Gay & T. L. Bennington (Eds.), Information technologies in evaluation: Social, moral, epistemological, and practical implications (pp. 23-43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. Wheeless, L. R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4, 143-157.
69. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 338-346.
70. Whitty, M. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men's and women's attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6, 569-579.
71. Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4, 623-639.
72. Woll, S. B., & Cozby, P. C. (1987). Videodating and other alternatives to traditional methods of relationship initiation. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 69-108.