Is the rush to provide on-line instruction setting our students up for failure?

Communication Education

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 122-126

  Allen, Terre H ^a,b  

^a Department of Communication Studies ^*  (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

General Education; On Line Instruction; Student Retention

Indexed keywords

EID: 31844453161     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520500343418     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Fleming, J. (1984). Blacks in college: A comparative study of students' success in black and in white institutions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Habley, W. R., & McClanahan, R. (2004). What works in student retention? ACT Policy Report. Retrieved August 29, 2005, from http://www.act.org
3. Levitz, R., & Noel, L. (1989). Connecting students to institutions: Keys to retention and success. In M. L. Upcraft & J. N. Gardner (Eds.), The freshman year experience (pp. 65-81). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Lotkowski, V. A., Robbins, S. B., & Noeth, R. J. (2004). The role of academic and non-academic factors on improving college retention. ACT Policy Report. Retrieved August 29, 2005, from http://www.act.org
5. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
6. Tinto, V. (2004). Student retention and graduation: Facing the truth, living with the consequences. Retrieved August 29, 2005, from http://www.pellinstitute.org