Social Identity, Group Processes, and Performance in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication

Group Dynamics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-39

  Michinov, Nicolas ^a,d   Michinov, Estelle ^b   Toczek Capelle, Marie Christine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^c Inst Univ de Form des Maitres   (France)

^d EIFAD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL STATUS; THEORY;

EID: 1642380388     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.27     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity theory. New York: Harvester.
2. Bouas, K. S., & Arrow, H. (1996). The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 156-178.
3. Bouas-Henry, K., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558-581.
4. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48, 109-126.
5. Craig, T. Y., & Kelly, J. R. (1999). Group cohesiveness and creative performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 243-256.
6. Driskell, J. E., Radtke, P. H., & Salas, E. (2003). Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 287-323.
7. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
8. Hackman, J. R., Jones, L. E., & McGrath, J. E. (1967). A set of dimensions for describing the general properties of group generated written passages. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 379-390.
9. Hoyle, R. H., Georgesen, J. C., & Webster, M. (2001). Analyzing data from individuals in groups: The past, the present, and the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 41-47.
10. James, K., & Greenberg, J. (1989). In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual performance and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 604-616.
11. Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
12. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
13. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
14. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashi, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
15. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
16. Lea, M. (1992). Contexts of computer-mediated communication. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
17. Lea, M., Rogers, P., & Postmes, T. (2002). SIDEVIEW: Evaluation of a system to develop team players and improve productivity in Internet collaborative learning groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 53-63.
18. Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526-537.
19. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
20. Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Original work published 1948)
21. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesion as interpersonal attraction. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.
22. McGrath, J. E., & Arrow, H. (1996). Introduction: The JEMCO-2 study of time, technology, and groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 107-126.
23. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
24. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 116-127.
25. Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41, 31-39.
26. O'Donnell, A. M., & O'Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321-349.
27. Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N., & De Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 184-204). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
28. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the on-line classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Pilegge, A. J., & Holtz, R. (1997). The effects of social identity on the self-set goals and task performance of high and low self-esteem individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 17-26.
30. Postmes, T. T. (1997). Social influence in computer-mediated groups. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
31. Postmes, T. T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content and "deindividuation" in computer-mediated groups. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 164-183). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
32. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved April 2001 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sud-weeks.html
33. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.
34. Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 463-480.
35. Sharan, S. (1994). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
36. Sherblom, J. C. (1990). Organizational involvement expressed through pronoun use in CMC. Communication Research Reports, 7, 45-50.
37. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
38. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
39. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
40. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Wolberg, A., Lea, M., & Rogers, P. (2000). Education: The virtual classroom? The social psychological influence of ICTs on society and their policy implications. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
41. Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group processes and productivity (pp. 48-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 60-76). London: Academic Press.
43. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
45. Taylor, J., & McDonald, J. (2002). The effects of asynchronous computer-mediated group interaction on group processes. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 260-274.
46. Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34.
47. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48. Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
50. Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
51. Weisband, S. (2002). Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 311-333). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Weldon, E., Jehn, K., & Pradhan, P. (1991). Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 555-569.
53. Williams, K. D., Karau, S. J., & Bourgeois, M. (1993). Working on collective tasks: Social loafing and social compensation. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 130-148). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
54. Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-413.