Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions

Communication Research

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 325-347

  Hancock, Jeffrey T ^a   Dunham, Philip J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035593401     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365001028003004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press.
3. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). The cross-modal consistency of personality: Inferring strangers' traits from visual or acoustic information. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 183-204.
4. Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38-48.
5. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1991). NEO-FFI Form S. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
10. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Foltz, C., Morse, J. Q., Calvo, N., & Barber, J. P. (1997). Self- and observer ratings on the NEO-FFI in couples: Initial evidence of the psychometric properties of an observer form. Assessment, 4, 287-295.
12. Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
13. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with inter-judge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
14. Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 434-453). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Hiltz, R.S., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision-making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
16. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification. London: Routledge.
17. Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5 [Online]. Available: www. ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html
18. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. London: Addison-Wesley.
19. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
20. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
21. Kenrick, D. T., McCreath, H. E., Govern, J., King, R., & Bordin, J. (1990). Person-environment intersections: Everyday settings and common trait dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 685-698.
22. Kenrick, D. T., & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88-104.
23. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
24. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation, and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
25. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-342.
26. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Behavior, 4, 221-233.
28. Maxwell, G. M., Cook, M. W., & Burr, R. (1985). The encoding and decoding of liking from behavioral cues in both auditory and visual channels. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 239-263.
29. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
30. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-96.
31. Scherer, K. (1979). Personality markers in speech. In K. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and over-hearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
33. Semin, (1989). Impressions of personality revisited: The contribution of linguistic factors to attribute inferences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 85-101.
34. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
35. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
36. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
37. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
38. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
39. Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
40. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
41. Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
42. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
43. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
44. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.
45. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Wyer, R. S., Swan, S., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Impression formation in informal conversations. Social Cognition, 13, 243-272.