Criticism on the Internet: An analysis of participant reactions

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 180-187

  Dsilva, Margaret U ^a   Maddox, Rebecca ^a   Collins, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041167832     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099809362112     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baym, N. K., 1995. “ The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication ”. In CyberSociety, Edited by: Jones, S. G., 138-163. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Baym, N.K., 1996. Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29: 315-345.
3. Burgoon, M., and Bailey, W., 1992. PC at last! Thank God almighty, we are PC at last!. Journal of Communication, 42: 95-104.
4. Kramarae, C., and Taylor, H.J., Electronic networks: Safe for women? The electronic salon: Feminism meets infotech. In 11th Annual Gender Studies Symposium. Available: ftp://ftp.lclark.edu
5. Labov, W., 1972. “ Rules for ritual insult ”. In Studies in Social Interaction, Edited by: Sudnow, D., 120-169. New York: Free Press.
6. Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P., and Spears, R., 1992. “Flaming” in computer mediated communication ”. In Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication, Edited by: Lea, M., 89-112. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
7. Matheson, K., and Zanna, M.P., 1990. Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me. Social Science Computer Review, 8: 1-12.
8. McLaughlin, M., Osborne, K., and Smith, B.C., 1995. “ Standards of conduct on Usenet ”. In CyberSodety, Edited by: Jones, S. G., 90-111. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., and McGuire, T.W., 1986. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 37: 157-187.
10. Smith, C.B., Mclaughlin, M.L., and Osborne, K.K., 1997. “ From terminal ineptitude to virtual sociopathy: How conduct is regulated on Usenet ”. In Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet, Edited by: Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M., and Rafaeli, S., 95-112. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
11. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S., 1991. Connections-New ways of working in the networked organization, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Spears, L., and Lea, M., 1992. “ Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication ”. In Contexts of computer-mediated communication, Edited by: Lea, M., 30-65. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
13. Sullivan-Trainor, M., 1994. Detour the truth about the information superhighway, San Mateo, CA: IDG Books Worldwide.
14. Walther, J. B., 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23: 3-43.
15. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., and Park, D. W., 1994. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21: 440-487.
16. Weedman, J., 1991. Task and non-task functions of a computer conference used in professional education: A measure of flexibility. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34: 303-318.
17. Wilkins, H., 1991. Computer talk: Long-distance conversations by computer. Written Communication, 8: 56-78.