Greetings and closings in workplace email

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 456-477

  Waldvogel, Joan ^a  

^a Ministry of Social Development   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC MAIL; MANUFACTURE; PLANT SHUTDOWNS;

ANALYTIC TECHNIQUE; EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; MANUFACTURING PLANT; NEW ZEALAND; SOCIAL DISTANCE; WORKPLACE CULTURE;

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33847283455     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00333.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abdullah, N. A. (2003). Relational Communication in Organisational Email: A Malaysian Case Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Language and Linguistics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
2. Brown. R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Seboek (Ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bunz, U., & Campbell, A. (2002, October). Accommodating politeness indicators in personal electronic mail messages. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researcher's 3rd Annual Conference Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved December 28, 2006 from http://bunz.comm.fsu.edu/ AoIR2002politeness.pdf
5. Crystal, D. (2001). The language of email. In Language and the Internet (pp. 94-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (pp. 191-233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.
7. Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), article 6. Retrieved December 28, 2006 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/duthler.html
8. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Garden City.
10. Herring, S. (1996a). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerization and Controversy. New York: Academic Press.
11. Herring, S. (1996b). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 81-105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Herring, S. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. The CPSR Newsletter, 18(1). Retrieved April 6, 2005 from http://archive.cpsr.net/publications/ newsletters/issues/2000/Winter2000/ herring.htm
13. Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
14. Holmes, J. (2000). Victoria University's Language in the Workplace Project: An overview. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, 1. Retrieved December 28, 2006 from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/research/lwp/docs/ ops/op1.html
15. Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and Politeness in the Workplace. London: Longman.
16. Huang, W., Watson, R. T., & Wei, K. K. (1998). Can a lean e-mail medium be used for rich communication? A psychological perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(4), 260-274.
17. Jessmer, S. L., & Anderson, D. E. (2001). The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 331-346.
18. Kankaanranta, A. (2005). "Hej Seppo, Could You Pis Comment on This!" Internal Email Communication in Lingua Franca English in a Multinational Company. Ph.D. dissertation, Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved January 7, 2007 from http://ebooks.jyu.fi/solki/9513923207.pdf
19. Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527.
20. Mulholland, J. (1999). E-mail: Uses, issues and problems in an institutional setting. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing Business (pp. 57-84). Singapore: Longman.
21. Murray, D. (2000). Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 397-423.
22. Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145-167.
23. Sherblom, J. (1988). Direction, function, and signature in electronic mail. Journal of Business Communication, 25(4), 39-54.
24. Waldvogel. J. (1999). Email: User Perceptions and Aspects of Its Role and Impact in One Workplace. Unpublished master's research project, School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
25. Waldvogel. J. (2005). The Role, Status and Style of Workplace Email: A Study of Two New Zealand Workplaces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
26. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
27. Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Williams, E. ( 1999). E-mail and the effect of future developments. First Monday, 4(8). Retrieved December 28, 2006 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_8/index.html
29. Zmud, R. W., & Carlson, J. R. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153-183.