Perceptions of on‐line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on‐line support groups

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 44-59

  Wright, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Homophily; On line support groups; Source credibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002160673     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370009385579     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adelman, M. B., and Frey, L. R., 1997. The fragile community: Living together with AIDS, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Adelman, M. B., Parks, M. R., and Albrecht, T. L., 1987. “ Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties ”. In Communicating social support, Edited by: Albrecht, T. L., and Adelman, M. B., 126-147. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Alexander, S. C., Wille, J. L., and Hollingshead, A. B., “ Help at your keyboard: Support groups on the internet ”. In Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups, (2nd ed.), Edited by: Frey, L. R., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrenece Erlbaum. (in press)
4. Albrecht, T. L., and Adelman, M. B., 1987. “ Rethinking the relationship between communication and social support: An introduction ”. In Communicating social support, Edited by: Albrecht, T. L., and Adelman, M. B., 13-39. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Albrecht, T. L., Burleson, B. R., and Goldsmith, D., 1994. “ Supportive communication ”. In Handbook of interpersonal communication, 2nd ed., Edited by: Knapp, M. L., and Miller, G. R., 419-449. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Balk, D. E., Tyson‐Rawson, K., and Colleti‐Wetel, J., 1993. Social support as an intervention with bereaved college students. Death Studies, 17: 427-450.
7. Berscheid, E., 1985. “ Interpersonal attraction ”. In Handbook of social psychology, 3rd ed., Edited by: Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E., Vol. 2, 413-484. New York: Random House.
8. Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., and Finn, J., in press. Communication of social support in computer‐mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication.
9. Cappella, J. N., 1984. The relevance of the microstructure of interaction to relationship change. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1: 239-264.
10. Cawyer, C. S., and Smith Dupre, A., 1995. Communicating social support: Identifying supportive episodes in an HIV/AIDS support group. Communication Quarterly, 43: 243-258.
11. Cline, R. J., 1999. “ Communication within social support groups ”. In Handbook of group communication theory & research, Edited by: Frey, L. R., Gouran, D. S., and Poole, M. S., 516-538. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Cluck, G. G., and Cline, R. J., 1986. The circle of others: Self‐help groups for the bereaved. Communication Quarterly, 34: 306-325.
13. DiMatteo, M. R., and Hays, R., 1981. “ Social support and serious illness ”. In Social networks and social support, Edited by: Gottlieb, B. H., 117-148. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S., 1993. The psychology of attitudes, Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
15. Finn, J., and Lavitt, M., 1994. Computer‐based self‐help groups for sexual abuse survivors. Social Work with Groups, 17: 21-47.
16. Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., and Rubin, R. B., 1998. Internet and face‐to‐face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46: 250-268.
17. Frey, L. R., Query, J. L., Jr., Flint, L.J., and Adelman, M. B., 1998. “ Living together with AIDS: Social support processes in a residential facility ”. In HIV and social interaction, Edited by: Derlega, V. J., and Barbee, A. P., 129-146. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Granovetter, M. S., 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
19. Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., and Womack, D. F., 1997. Building communication theory, (3rd ed.), Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
20. La Gaipa, J. J., 1990. “ The negative effects of informal support systems ”. In Personal relationships and social support, Edited by: Duck, S., and Silver, R. C., 122-139. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Lea, M., and Spears, R., 1992. Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2: 321-341.
22. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1996. Fundamentals of human communication, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
23. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., and Stewart, R. A., 1986. One on one: The foundations of interpersonal communication, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
24. Nie, N. H., and Erbring, L., 2000. Internet and society: A preliminary report, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society Press.
25. North, R. C., Holsti, O., Zaninovich, M. G., and Zinnes, D. A., 1963. Content analysis: A handbook with applications for the study of international crisis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
26. Papacharissi, Z., and Rubin, A. M., 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44: 175-196.
27. Parks, M. R., and Floyd, K., 1996. Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 14: 85-108.
28. Perse, E. M., and Courtright, J. A., 1993. Normative images of communication media: Mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Communication Research, 19: 485-503.
29. Rubin, A. M., and Rubin, R. B., 1985. Interface of personal and mediated communication: A research agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2: 36-53.
30. Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., and Pierce, G. R., 1990. Social support: An interactional view, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N., and Pierce, G. R., 1987. A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4: 497-510.
32. Schmitz, J., and Fulk, J., 1991. Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18: 487-523.
33. Stanton, J. M., 1998. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Personnel Psychology, 51: 709-725.
34. Straus, S. G., 1997. Technology, group processes, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in performance in computer‐mediated and face‐to‐face groups. Human‐Computer Interaction, 12: 227-266.
35. Sullivan, C. F., and Reardon, K. K., 1985. “ Social support satisfaction and health locus of control: Discriminators of breast cancer patients’ style of coping ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: McLaughlin, M. L., Vol. 9, 707-722. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., and Daft, R. L., 1987. Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14: 553-574.
37. Walther, J. B., 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer‐mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19: 52-90.
38. Walther, J. B., 1993. Impression development in computer‐mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57: 381-398.
39. Walther, J. B., 1994. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer‐mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20: 473-501.
40. Walther, J. B., 1995. Relational aspects of computer‐mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organizational Science, 6: 186-203.
41. Walther, J. B., 1996. Computer‐mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23: 3-43.
42. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., and Park, D., 1994. Interpersonal effects in computer‐mediated interaction: A meta‐analysis of social and anti‐social communication. Communication Research, 21: 460-487.
43. Walther, J. B., and Burgoon, J. K., 1992. Relational communication in computer‐mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19: 50-88.
44. Weinberg, N., Schmale, J. D., Uken, J., and Wessel, K., 1995. Computer‐mediated support groups. Social Work with Group, 17: 43-54.
45. Wright, K. B., 1997. Shared ideology in Alcoholics Anonymous: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Health Communication, 2: 83-99.
46. Wright, K. B., 1999. Computer‐mediated social support, older adults, and coping, Norman: University of Oklahoma. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
47. Wright, K. B., in press. Computer‐mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies. Communication Quarterly.
48. Wright, K. B., The communication of social support within an on‐line community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Paper presented at the annual Eastern States Communication Association Convention. Pittsburgh, PA. April.