Let me count the ways the interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 36-65

  Walther, Joseph B ^a   Loh, Tracy ^a   Granka, Laura ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affinity; Computer mediated communication; Cues

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544281055     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X04273036     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Andersen, J. F., Andersen, P. A., & Jensen, A. D. (1979). The measurement of immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 153-180.
3. Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
5. Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1988). Measurement and reliability of nonverbal behavior and percepts. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 205-233.
6. Bales, R. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257-263.
7. Baym, N. K. (1999). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677.
10. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L., & deTurck, M. A. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10, 351-378.
11. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
13. Burgoon, J. K., & Le Poire, B. A. (1999). Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality. Communication Monographs, 66, 105-124.
14. Burgoon, J. K., Le Poire, B. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 287-321.
15. Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational messages of nonverbal involvement: Comparing participant and observer perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 96-113.
16. Calhoun, C. (1991). Indirect relationships and imagined communities: Large scale social integration and the transformation of everyday life. In J. Coleman & P. Bourdieu (Eds.), Social theory for a changing society (pp. 95-121). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17. Cissna, K. N., & Sieburg, E. (1981). Patterns of interactional confirmation and disconfirmation. In C. Wilder-Mott & J. H. Weakland (Eds.), Rigor and imagination: Essays from the legacy of Gregory Bateson (pp. 253-282). New York: Praeger.
18. Coker, D. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13, 463-494.
19. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Cummings, J., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45, 103-108.
21. Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., Stahle, R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1983, May). The effects of distance violations on verbal immediacy: An exploration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX.
22. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
23. Feldman, M. (1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office: Technology and People, 3, 83-101.
24. Fiehler, R. (2002). How to do emotions with words: Emotionality in conversations. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 79-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Finholt, T., & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, 41-64.
26. Fussell, S. R. (2002). The verbal communication of emotion: Introduction and overview. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Gallois, C. (1993). The language and communication of emotions: Universal, interpersonal, or intergroup? American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 262-270.
28. Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B., & Mantei, M. (1995). Work relationships and media use: A social network analysis. Group Decision and Negotiations, 4, 193-211.
29. Jablin, F. M. (1978). Message-response and "openness" in superior-subordinate communication. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 293-309). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
30. Jablin, F. M. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1201-1222.
31. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 81-123.
32. Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V., & Barker, M. (1999). Strategies of accommodation: Development of a coding system for conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 123-152.
33. Jones, S. E., & LeBaron, C. D. (2002). Guest editors' introduction, Journal of Communication, 52, 499-521.
34. Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P. (1997). Friendship formation in cyberspace: Analysis of a national survey of users. Retrieved November 6, 2002, from http://www. nicoladoering.net/Hogrefe/katz.htm
35. McCormick, N. B., & McCormick, J. W. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 379-405.
36. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from non-immediacy of verbal communications. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 294-305.
37. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38. Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1966). Non-immediacy between communicator and object of communication in a verbal message: Application to the inference of attitudes. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 420-425.
39. Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1987). Relational dimensions of interpersonal dynamics. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 117-139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Nardi, B., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face to face communication in distributed work. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work: New research on working across distance using technology(pp. 83-110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Newton, D. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1990). Nonverbal conflict behaviors: Functions, strategies, and tactics. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.),Intimates in conflict: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. O'Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (in press). Mediated immediacy; A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
43. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-84.
44. Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). "Making MOOsic" The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537.
45. Reid, E. M. (1991). Electropolis: Communication and community on Internet relay chat. Honors thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved March 25, 2003, from http://home.earthlink.net/aluluei/electropolis.htm
46. Reid, F. J. M., Malinek, V., Stott, C., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication. Ergonomics, 39, 1017-1037.
47. Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
48. Robinson, R. Y., & Richmond, V. P. (1995). Validity of the verbal immediacy scale. Communication Research Reports, 12, 80-84.
49. Rogers, P. L., Scherer, K. R., & Rosenthal, R. (1971). Content-filtering human speech: A simple electronic system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 3, 16-18.
50. Scheerhorn, D. R. (1991-1992). Politeness in decision-making.Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 253-273.
51. Scherer, K. R., Koivumaki, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1972). Minimal cues in the vocal communication of affect: Judging emotions from content-masked speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 269-285.
52. Shimanoff, S. B. (1988). Group interaction via communication rules. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samover (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (5th ed., pp. 50-64). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
53. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: John Wiley.
54. Siegal, J., Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S. B., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Behaviour Processes, 3, 157-187.
55. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon?: The hidden power in computer-mediated communication, Communication Research, 21, 427-59.
56. Starkweather, J. A. (1956). The communication-value of content free speech. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 121-123.
57. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
58. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(1). Retrieved April 7, 2000, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
59. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
60. Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186-203.
61. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
62. Walther, J. B., & D'Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 323-345.
63. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
65. Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968), Language within language:Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
66. Witt, P. L. (2004). An initial examination of observed verbal immediacy and participants' opinions of communication effectiveness in online group interaction. Journal of Online Behavior, 2(1). Retrieved October 31, 2004, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v2n1/witt.html