Chromosome-microtubule interactions during mitosis

Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 18, Issue , 2002, Pages 193-219

  McIntosh, J Richard ^a   Grishchuk, Ekaterina L ^a,b   West, Robert R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF GENE BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Centromere; Kinetochore; Microtubule associated protein; Motor enzyme; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR;

BIODIVERSITY; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; ENZYME LOCALIZATION; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINDLE POLE BODY; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME; CYTOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE; GENETICS; HUMAN; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENES, CDC; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MOLECULAR MOTOR PROTEINS;

EID: 0036437405     PISSN: 10810706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.032002.132412     Document Type: Review

References (189)

1. Abrieu A, Kahana JA, Wood KW, Cleveland DW. 2000. CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell 102:817-26
2. Abrieu A, Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Kahana JA, Peter M, Castro A, et al. 2001. Mps1 is a kinetochore-associated kinase essential for the vertebrate mitotic checkpoint. Cell 106: 83-93
3. Amon A. 1999. The spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:69-75
4. Antonio C, Ferby I, Wilhelm H, Jones M, Karsenti E, et al. 2000. Xkid, a chromokinesin required for chromosome alignment on the metaphase plate. Cell 102:425-35
5. Ault JG, DeMarco AJ, Salmon ED, Rieder CL. 1991. Studies on the ejection properties of asters: Astral microtubule turnover influences the oscillatory behavior and positioning of mono-oriented chromosomes. J. Cell Sci. 99:701-10
6. Bajer AS, Cypher C, Mole-Bajer J, Howard HM. 1982. Taxol-induced anaphase reversal: Evidence that elongating microtubules can exert a pushing force in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:6569-73
7. Basto R, Gomes R, Karess RE. 2000. Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 2: 939-43
8. Beinhauer JD, Hagan IM, Hegemann JH, Fleig U. 1997. Mal3, the fission yeast homologue of the human APC-interacting protein EB-1 is required for microtubule integrity and the maintenance of cell form. J. Cell Biol. 139: 717-28
9. Berrueta L, Tirnauer JS, Schuyler SC, Pellman D, Bierer BE. 1999. The APC-associated protein EB1 associates with components of the dynactin complex and cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chain. Curr. Biol. 9:425-28
10. Biggins S, Severin FF, Bhalla N, Sassoon I, Hyman AA, Murray AW. 1999. The conserved protein kinase Ip11 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13:532-44
11. Campbell MS, Gorbsky GJ. 1995. Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 129:1195-204
12. Carpenter ATC. 1991. Distributive segregation: Motors in the polar wind. Cell 64:885-90
13. Cassimeris L. 2002. The oncoprotein 18/stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:18-24
14. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Start DA, Goldberg ML, Yen TJ. 2000. Human ZW10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:944-47
15. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Sudakin V, Hittle JC, Yen TJ. 1999. Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 146:941-54
16. Chan GK, Schaar BT, Yen TJ. 1998. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol. 143:49-63
17. Cheeseman IM, Brew C, Wolyniak M, Desai A, Anderson S, et al. 2001. Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function. J. Cell Biol. 155:1137-45
18. Cheeseman IM, Drubin DG, Barnes G. 2002. Simple centromere, complex kinetochore: Linking spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 157:199-203
19. Church K, Liu H-P. 1985. Kinetochore microtubules and chromosome movement during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes studied in life and with the electron microscope. Chromosoma 92:273-82
20. Compton DA. 2000. Spindle assembly in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:95-114
21. Cottingham FR, Gheber L, Miller DL, Hoyt MA. 1999. Novel roles for Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle motors. J. Cell Biol. 147:335-50
22. Cottingham FR, Hoyt MA. 1997. Mitotic spindle positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is accomplished by antagonistically acting microtubule motor proteins. J. Cell Biol. 138: 1041-53
23. Coue M, Lombillo VA, McIntosh JR. 1991. Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 112:1165-75
24. Daum JR, Tugendreich S, Topper LM, Jorgensen PM, Hoog C, et al. 2000. The 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody binds the mitotically phosphorylated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Curr. Biol. 10:R850-52
25. Desai A, Maddox PS, Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. 1998. Anaphase A chromosome movement and poleward spindle microtubule flux occur at similar rates in Xenopus extract spindles. J. Cell Biol. 141:703-13
26. Desai A, Mitchison TJ. 1997. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:83-117
27. Desai A, Verma S, Mitchison TJ, Walczak CE. 1999. Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes. Cell 96:69-78
28. DeZwaan TM, Ellingson E, Pellman D, Roof DM. 1997. Kinesin-related KIP3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for a distinct step in nuclear migration. J. Cell Biol. 138:1023-40
29. Dogterom M, Felix MA, Guet CC, Leibler S. 1996. Influence of M-phase chromatin on the anisotropy of microtubule asters. J. Cell Biol. 133:125-40
30. Donaldson AD, Kilmartin JV. 1996. Spc42p: A phosphorylated component of the S. cerevisiae spindle pole body with an essential function during SPB duplication. J. Cell Biol. 132:887-901
31. Dujardin D, Wacker UI, Moreau A, Schroer TA, Rickard JE, De Mey JR. 1998. Evidence for a role of CLIP-170 in the establishment of metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 141:849-62
32. Echeverri CJ, Paschal BM, Vaughan KT, Vallee RB. 1996. Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 132:617-33
33. Endow SA, Kang SJ, Satterwhite LL, Rose MD, Skeen VP, Salmon ED. 1994. Yeast Kar3 is a minus-end microtubule motor protein that destabilizes microtubules preferentially at the minus ends. EMBO J. 13:2708-13
34. Faulkner NE, Dujardin DL, Tai CY, Vaughan KT, O'Connell CB, et al. 2000. A role for the lissencephaly gene LIS1 in mitosis and cytoplasmic dynein function. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:784-91
35. Funabiki H, Hagan I, Uzawa S, Yanagida M. 1993. Cell cycle-dependent specific positioning and clustering of centromeres and telomeres in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 121:961-76
36. Funabiki H, Murray AW. 2000. The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement. Cell 102:411-24
37. Gaglio T, Dionne MA, Compton DA. 1997. Mitotic spindle poles are organized by structural and motor proteins in addition to centrosomes. J. Cell Biol. 138:1055-66
38. Garcia MS, Koonrugsa M, Toda T. 2002. Two kinesin-like Kin-I family proteins in fission yeast regulate the establishment of metaphase and onset of anaphase A. Curr. Biol. 12:610-21
39. Gepner J, Li M, Ludmann S, Kortas C, Boylan K, et al. 1996. Cytoplasmic dynein function is essential in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 142:865-78
40. Geuens G, Hill AM, Levilliers N, Adoutte A, DeBrabander M. 1989. Microtubule dynamics investigated by microinjection of Paramecium axonemal tubulin: Lack of nucleation but proximal assembly of microtubules at the kinetochore during prometaphase. J. Cell Biol. 108:939-53
41. Gorbsky GJ, Borisy GG. 1989. Microtubules of the kinetochore fiber turn over in metaphase but not in anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 109:653-62
42. Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA. 1993. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122:1311-21
43. Gorbsky GJ, Sammak PJ, Borisy GG. 1988. Microtubule dynamics and chromosome motion visualized in living anaphase cells. J. Cell Biol. 106:1185-92
44. Gordon MB, Howard L, Compton DA. 2001. Chromosome movement in mitosis requires microtubule anchorage at spindle poles. J. Cell Biol. 152:425-34
45. Goshima G, Yanagida M. 2000. Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100:619-33
46. Guacci V, Hogan E, Koshland D. 1997a. Centromere position in budding yeast: Evidence for anaphase A. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:957-72
47. Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A. 1997b. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91:47-57
48. Gunawardane RN, Lizarraga SB, Wiese C, Wilde A, Zheng Y. 2000. Gamma-tubulin complexes and their role in microtubule nucleation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 49:55-73
49. Hannak E, Kirkham M, Hyman AA, Oegema K. 2001. Aurora-A kinase is required for centrosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 155:1109-16
50. Harada A, Takei Y, Kanai Y, Tanaka Y, Nonaka S, Hirokawa N. 1998. Golgi vesiculation and lysosome dispersion in cells lacking cytoplasmic dynein. J. Cell Biol. 141:51-59
51. He X, Asthana S, Sorger PK. 2000. Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101:763-75
52. He X, Rines DR, Espelin CW, Sorger PK. 2001. Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell 106:195-206
53. Heald R, Tournebize R, Habermann A, Karsenti E, Hyman A. 1997. Spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts: Respective roles of centrosomes and microtubule self-organization. J. Cell Biol. 138:615-28
54. Heald R, Weis K. 2000. Spindles get the ran around. Trends Cell Biol. 10:1-4
55. Hill TL. 1985. Theoretical problems related to the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4404-8
56. Hiramoto Y, Nakano Y. 1988. Micromanipulation studies of the mitotic apparatus in sand dollar eggs. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 10:172-84
57. Hofmann C, Cheeseman IM, Goode BL, McDonald KL, Barnes G, Drubin DG. 1998. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Duolp and Damlp, novel proteins involved in mitotic spindle function. J. Cell Biol. 143:1029-40
58. Holy TE, Leibler S. 1994. Dynamic instability of microtubules as an efficient way to search in space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5682-85
59. Howell BJ, Hoffman DB, Fang G, Murray AW, Salmon ED. 2000. Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 150:1233-50
60. Howell BJ, McEwen BF, Canman JC, Hoffman DB, Farrar EM, et al. 2001. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155:1159-72
61. Hoyt MA. 2001. A new view of the spindle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 154:909-11
62. Hunt AJ, McIntosh JR. 1998. The dynamic behavior of individual microtubules associated with chromosomes in vitro. Mol. Biol. Cell 9: 2857-71
63. Hyman AA, Sorger PK. 1995. Structure and function of kinetochores in budding yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:471-95
64. Inoue S, Salmon ED. 1995. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell 6:1619-40
65. Joglekar A-P, Hunt AJ. 2002. A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements. Biophys. J. In press
66. Jones MH, Bachant JB, Castillo AR, Giddings TH Jr, Winey M. 1999. Yeast Dam1p is required to maintain spindle integrity during mitosis and interacts with the Mps1p kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:2377-91
67. Jones MH, He X, Giddings TH, Winey M. 2001. Yeast Dam1p has a role at the kinetochore in assembly of the mitotic spindle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13675-80
68. Juang YL, Huang J, Peters JM, McLaughlin ME, Tai CY, Penman D. 1997. APC-mediated proteolysis of Ase1 and the morphogenesis of the mitotic spindle. Science 275:1311-14s
69. Kang J, Cheeseman IM, Kallstrom G, Velmurugan S, Barnes G, Chan CS. 2001. Functional cooperation of Dam1, Ip11, and the inner centromere protein (INCENP)-related protein Sli15 during chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 155:763-74
70. Kaplan KB, Burds AA, Swedlow JR, Bekir SS, Sorger PK, Nathke IS. 2001. A role for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:429-32
71. Kapoor TM, Mayer TU, Coughlin ML, Mitchison TJ. 2000. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell Biol. 150:975-88
72. Karki S, Holzbaur EL. 1999. Cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin in cell division and intracellular transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11: 45-53
73. Khodjakov A, Cole RW, Bajer AS, Rieder CL. 1996. The force for poleward chromosome motion in Haemanthus cells acts along the length of the chromosome during metaphase but only at the kinetochore during anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 132:1093-104
74. Khodjakov A, Gabashvili IS, Rieder CL. 1999. "Dumb" versus "smart" kinetochore models for chromosome congression during mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 43:179-85
75. Khodjakov A, Rieder CL. 1996. Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome. J. Cell Biol. 135:315-27
76. Khodjakov A, Rieder CL. 1999. The sudden recruitment of gamma-tubulin to the centrosome at the onset of mitosis and its dynamic exchange throughout the cell cycle do not require microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 146:585-96
77. Khodjakov A, Rieder CL. 2001. Centrosomes enhance the fidelity of cytokinesis in vertebrates and are required for cell cycle progression. J. Cell Biol. 153:237-42
78. King JM, Hays TS, Nicklas RB. 2000. Dynein is a transient kinetochore component whose binding is regulated by microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 151:739-48
79. King JM, Nicklas RB. 2000. Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113 Pt 21:3815-23
80. Koshland DE, Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW. 1988. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature 331:499-504
81. Kuriyama R, Kofron M, Essner R, Kato T, Dragas-Granoic S, et al. 1995. Characterization of a minus end-directed kinesin-like motor protein from cultured mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 129:1049-59
82. LaFountain JR Jr, Cole RW, Rieder CL. 2002. Polar ejection forces are operative in cranefly spermatocytes, but their action is limited to the spindle periphery. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 51:16-26
83. Lavoie BD, Hogan E, Koshland D. 2002. In vivo dissection of the chromosome condensation machinery: Reversibility of condensation distinguishes contributions of condensin and cohesin. J. Cell Biol. 25:25
84. Lee JY, Orr-Weaver TL. 2001. The molecular basis of sister-chromatid cohesion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17:753-77
85. Levesque AA, Compton DA. 2001. The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles. J. Cell Biol. 154:1135-46
86. Li X, Nicklas RB. 1995. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373:630-32
87. Li Y, Bachant J, Alcasabas AA, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. 2002. The mitotic spindle is required for loading of the DASH complex onto the kinetochore. Genes Dev. 16:183-97
88. Lin H, de Carvalho P, Kho D, Tai CY, Pierre P, et al. 2001. Polyploids require Bik1 for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J. Cell Biol. 155:1173-84
89. Lombillo VA, Nislow C, Yen TJ, Gelfand VI, McIntosh JR. 1995a. Antibodies to the kinesin motor domain and CENP-E inhibit microtubule depolymerization-dependent motion of chromosomes in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 128:107-15
90. Lombillo VA, Stewart RJ, McIntosh JR. 1995b. Minus-end-directed motion of kinesincoated microspheres driven by microtubule depolymerization. Nature 373:161-64
91. Losada A, Hirano T. 2001. Shaping the metaphase chromosome: Coordination of cohesion and condensation. BioEssays 23:924-35
92. Maddox PS, Bloom KS, Salmon ED. 2000. The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:36-41
93. Mallavarapu A, Sawin K, Mitchison T. 1999. A switch in microtubule dynamics at the onset of anaphase B in the mitotic spindle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr. Biol. 9:1423-26
94. Maney T, Ginkel LM, Hunter AW, Wordeman L. 2000. The kinetochore of higher eucaryotes: A molecular view. Int. Rev. Cytol. 194:67-131
95. Maney T, Hunter AW, Wagenbach M, Wordeman L. 1998. Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin is important for anaphase chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 142:787-801
96. Maney T, Wagenbach M, Wordeman L. 2001. Molecular dissection of the microtubule depolymerizing activity of mitotic centromere-associated kinesin. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 34753-58
97. Martinez-Exposito MJ, Kaplan KB, Copeland J, Sorger PK. 1999. Retention of the BUB3 checkpoint protein on lagging chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8493-98
98. Mastronarde DN, McDonald KL, Ding R, McIntosh JR. 1993. Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells. J. Cell Biol. 123:1475-89
99. McEwen BF, Chan GK, Zubrowski B, Savoian MS, Sauer MT, Yen TJ. 2001. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2776-89
100. McEwen BF, Heagle AB, Cassels GO, Buttle KF, Rieder CL. 1997. Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 137:1567-80
101. McIntosh JR, Pfarr CM. 1991. Mitotic motors. J. Cell Biol. 115:577-85
102. Merdes A, Heald R, Samejima K, Earnshaw WC, Cleveland DW. 2000. Formation of spindle poles by dynein/dynactin-dependent transport of NuMA. J. Cell Biol. 149:851-62
103. Merdes A, Ramyar K, Vechio JD, Cleveland DW. 1996. A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 87:447-58
104. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. 1997. Cohesins: Chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91:35-45
105. Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Shiina N, Tsukita S. 2000. The dynamic behavior of the APC-binding protein EB1 on the distal ends of microtubules. Curr. Biol. 10:865-68
106. Mitchison T, Evans L, Schulze E, Kirschner M. 1986. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell 45:515-27
107. Mitchison TJ. 1989a. Chromosome alignment at mitotic metaphase: Balanced forces or smart kinetochores? In Cell Movement, Vol. 2: Kinesin, Dynein, and Microtubule Dynamics, ed. FD Warner, JR McIntosh, pp. 421-30. New York: Liss
108. Mitchison TJ. 1989b. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: Evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J. Cell Biol. 109:637-52
109. Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. 1992. Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 119:569-82
110. Molina I, Baars S, Brill JA, Hales KG, Fuller MT, Ripoll P. 1997. A chromatin-associated kinesin-related protein required for normal mitotic chromosome segregation in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 139:1361-71
111. Moore JD. 2001. The Ran-GTPase and cell-cycle control. BioEssays 23:77-85
112. Moores CA, Yu M, Guo J, Beraud C, Sakowicz R, Milligan RA. 2002. A mechanism for microtubule depolymerization by KinI kinesins. Mol. Cell. 9:903-9
113. Nabeshima K, Nakagawa T, Straight AF, Murray A, Chikashige Y, et al. 1998. Dynamics of centromeres during metaphase-anaphase transition in fission yeast: Dis1 is implicated in force balance in metaphase bipolar spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:3211-25
114. Nachury MV, Maresca TJ, Salmon WC, Waterman-Storer CM, Heald R, Weis K. 2001. Importin beta is a mitotic target of the small GTPase Ran in spindle assembly. Cell 104:95-106
115. Nicklas RB. 1997. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275:632-37
116. Nicklas RB, Arana P. 1992. Evolution and the meaning of metaphase. J. Cell Sci. 102:681-90
117. Nicklas RB, Ward SC, Gorbsky GJ. 1995. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130:929-39
118. Nicklas RB, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Ward SC. 2001. Checkpoint signals in grasshopper meiosis are sensitive to microtubule attachment, but tension is still essential. J. Cell Sci. 114:4173-83
119. Oakley BR. 2000. γ-tubulin. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 49:27-54
120. Ohkura H, Garcia MA, Toda T. 2001. Dis1/ TOG universal microtubule adaptors - One MAP for all? J. Cell Sci. 114:3805-12
121. Perez F, Diamantopoulos GS, Stalder R, Kreis TE. 1999. CLIP-170 highlights growing microtubule ends in vivo. Cell 96:517-27
122. Pickett-Heaps JD, Carpenter J. 1993. An extended corona attached to metaphase kinetochores of the green alga Oedogonium. Eur J. Cell Biol. 60:300-7
123. Pickett-Heaps JD, Forer A, Spurck T. 1997. Traction fibre: Toward a "tensegral" model of the spindle. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 37:1-6
124. Pidoux AL, LeDizet M, Cande WZ. 1996. Fission yeast pk11 is a kinesin-related protein involved in mitotic spindle function. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:1639-55
125. Pluta AF, Mackay AM, Ainsztein AM, Goldberg IG, Earnshaw WC. 1995. The centromere: Hub of chromosomal activities. Science 270:1591-94
126. Rieder CL, Davison EA, Jensen LC, Cassimeris L, Salmon ED. 1986. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J. Cell Biol. 103:581-91
127. Rieder CL, Khodjakov A, Paliulis LV, Fortier TM, Cole RW, Sluder G. 1997. Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: Implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5107-12
128. Rieder CL, Salmon ED. 1998. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8:310-18
129. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. 1994. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-10
130. Ris H, Witt PL. 1981. Structure of the mammalian kinetochore. Chromosoma 82:153-70
131. Salmon ED, Leslie RJ, Saxton WM, Karow ML, McIntosh JR. 1984a. Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: Analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching. J. Cell Biol. 99: 2165-74
132. Salmon ED, McKeel M, Hays T. 1984b. Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine. J. Cell Biol. 99:1066-75
133. Sampson K, Pickett-Heaps JD. 2001. Phallacidin stains the kinetochore region in the mitotic spindle of the green algae Oedogonium spp. Protoplasma 217:166-76
134. Saunders W, Hornack D, Lengyel V, Deng C. 1997. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinesin-related motor Kar3p acts at preanaphase spindle poles to limit the number and length of cytoplasmic microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 137:417-31
135. Savoian MS, Goldberg ML, Rieder CL. 2000. The rate of poleward chromosome motion is attenuated in Drosophila zw10 and rod mutants. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:948-52
136. Sawin KE, Mitchison TJ. 1991. Poleward microtubule flux mitotic spindles assembled in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 112:941-54
137. Sawin KE, Mitchison TJ. 1994. Microtubule flux in mitosis is independent of chromosomes, centrosomes, and antiparallel microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:217-26
138. Saxton WM, Stemple DL, Leslie RJ, Salmon ED, Zavortink M, McIntosh JR. 1984. Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 99:2175-86
139. Scaerou F, Aguilera I, Saunders R, Kane N, Blottiere L, Karess R. 1999. The rough deal protein is a new kinetochore component required for accurate chromosome segregation in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 112:3757-68
140. Schaar BT, Chan GK, Maddox P, Salmon ED, Yen TJ. 1997. CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 139:1373-82
141. Schiebel E. 2000. gamma-Tubulin complexes: Binding to the centrosome, regulation and microtubule nucleation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:113-18
142. Schwartz K, Richards K, Botstein D. 1997. BIMI encodes a microtubule-binding protein in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:2677-91
143. Severin F, Habermann B, Huffaker T, Hyman T. 2001. Stu2 promotes mitotic spindle elongation in anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 153: 435-42
144. Shapiro PS, Vaisberg E, Hunt AJ, Tolwinski NS, Whalen AM, et al. 1998. Activation of the MKK/ERK pathway during somatic cell mitosis: Direct interactions of active ERK with kinetochores and regulation of the mitotic 3F3/2 phosphoantigen. J. Cell Biol. 142:1533-45
145. Sharp DJ, Rogers GC, Scholey JM. 2000a. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:922-30
146. Sharp DJ, Rogers GC, Scholey JM. 2000b. Microtubule motors in mitosis. Nature 407:41-47
147. Shelden E, Wadsworth P. 1992. Microinjection of biotin-tubulin into anaphase cells induces transient elongation of kinetochore microtubules and reversal of chromosome-to-pole motion. J. Cell Biol. 116:1409-20
148. Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW. 2000. Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289:300-3
149. Skibbens RV, Rieder CL, Salmon ED. 1995. Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: Evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension. J. Cell Sci. 108:2537-48
150. Skibbens RV, Salmon ED. 1997. Micromanipulation of chromosomes in mitotic vertebrate tissue cells: Tension controls the state of kinetochore movement. Exp. Cell Res. 235:314-24
151. Skibbens RV, Skeen VP, Salmon ED. 1993. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: A push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122:859-75
152. Skoufias DA, Andreassen PR, Lacroix FB, Wilson L, Margolis RL. 2001. Mammalian Mad2 and Bub1/BubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:4492-97
153. Starr DA, Williams BC, Hays TS, Goldberg ML. 1998. ZW10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 142:763-74
154. Stern BM, Murray AW. 2001. Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 11:1462-67
155. Su LK, Burrell M, Hill DE, Gyuris J, Brent R, et al. 1995. APC binds to the novel protein EB1. Cancer Res. 55:2972-77
156. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ. 2001. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BubR1, Bub3, Cdc20, and Mad2. J. Cell Biol. 154:925-36
157. Sullivan M, Lehane C, Uhlmann F. 2001. Orchestrating anaphase and mitotic exit: Separase cleavage and localization of S1k19. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:771-77
158. Tai C-Y, Dujardin D, Faulkner NE, Vallee R. 2002. Role of dynein, dynactin, and CLIP-170 interactions in LIS1 kinetochore function. J. Cell Biol. 156:1-11
159. Tanaka T, Fuchs J, Loidl J, Nasmyth K. 2000. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:492-99
160. Tang Z, Bharadwaj R, Li B, Yu H. 2001. Mad2-independent inhibition of APC-Cdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 1:227-37
161. Tippit DH, Pickett-Heaps JD, Leslie R. 1980. Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia. III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase. J. Cell Biol. 86:402-16
162. Troxell CL, Sweezy MA, West RR, Reed KD, Carson BD, et al. 2001. Pk11(+) and K1p2(+): Two kinesins of the Kar3 subfamily in fission yeast perform different functions in both mitosis and meiosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:3476-88
163. Vaisberg EA, Koonce MP, McIntosh JR. 1993. Cytoplasmic dynein plays a role in mammalian mitotic spindle formation. J. Cell Biol. 123:849-58
164. Verde F, Berrez JM, Antony C, Karsenti E. 1991. Taxol-induced microtubule asters in mitotic extracts of Xenopus eggs: Requirement for phosphorylated factors and cytoplasmic dynein. J. Cell Biol. 112:1177-87
165. Walczak CE, Mitchison TJ, Desai A. 1996. XKCM: A Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 84:37-47
166. Walker DL, Wang D, Jin Y, Rath U, Wang Y, et al. 2000. Skeletor, a novel chromosomal protein that redistributes during mitosis, provides evidence for the formation of a spindle matrix. J. Cell Biol. 151:1401-12
167. Wang SZ, Adler R. 1995. Chromokinesin: A DNA-binding, klnesin-like nuclear protein. J. Cell Biol. 128:761-68
168. Wassmann K, Benezra R. 2001. Mitotic checkpoints: From yeast to cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:83-90
169. Waterman-Storer CM, Salmon ED. 1998. How microtubules get fluorescent speckles. Biophys. J. 75:2059-69
170. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED. 1998. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141:1181-91
171. Waters JC, Mitchison TJ, Rieder CL, Salmon ED. 1996a. The kinetochore microtubule minus-end disassembly associated with pole-ward flux produces a force that can do work. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:1547-58
172. Waters JC, Skibbens RV, Salmon ED. 1996b. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109:2823-31
173. West RR, Malmstrom T, McIntosh JR. 2002. Kinesins K1p5(+) and K1p6(+) are required for normal chromosome movement in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 115:931-40
174. West RR, Malmstrom T, Troxell CL, McIntosh JR. 2001. Two related kinesins, k1p5(+) and k1p6(+), foster microtubule disassembly and are required for meiosis in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:3919-32
175. Wiese C, Wilde A, Moore MS, Adam SA, Merdes A, Zheng Y. 2001. Role of importin-beta in coupling Ran to downstream targets in microtubule assembly. Science 291:653-56
176. Wigge PA, Kilmartin JV. 2001. The Ndc80p complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains conserved centromere components and has a function in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 152:349-60
177. Wise D, Cassimeris L, Rieder CL, Wadsworth P, Salmon ED. 1991. Chromosome fiber dynamics and congression oscillations in metaphase PtK2 cells at 23 degrees C. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 18:131-42
178. Wittmann T, Hyman A, Desai A. 2001. The spindle: A dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E28-34
179. Wojcik E, Basto R, Serr M, Scaerou F, Karess R, Hays T. 2001. Kinetochore dynein: Its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:1001-7
180. Wood KW, Sakowicz R, Goldstein LS, Cleveland DW. 1997. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 91: 357-66
181. Wordeman L, Mitchison TJ. 1995. Identification and partial characterization of mitotic centromere-associated kinesin, a kinesin-related protein that associates with centromeres during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 128:95-104
182. Wordeman L, Steuer ER, Sheetz MP, Mitchison T. 1991. Chemical subdomains within the kinetochore domain of isolated CHO mitotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 114:285-94
183. Yamamoto A, West RR, McIntosh JR, Hiraoka Y. 1999. A cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain is required for oscillatory nuclear movement of meiotic prophase and efficient meiotic recombination in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 145:1233-49
184. Yao X, Abrieu A, Zheng Y, Sullivan KF, Cleveland DW. 2000. CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:484-91
185. Yao X, Anderson KL, Cleveland DW. 1997. The microtubule-dependent motor centromere-associated protein E (CENP- E) is an integral component of kinetochore corona fibers that link centromeres to spindle microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 139:435-47
186. Yeh E, Skibbens RV, Cheng YW, Salmon ED, Bloom K. 1995. Spindle dynamics and cell cycle regulation of dynein in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 130:687-700
187. Yen TJ, Li G, Schaar BT, Szilak I, Cleveland DW. 1992. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature 359:536-39
188. Yucel JK, Marszalek JD, McIntosh JR, Goldstein LS, Cleveland DW, Philp AV. 2000. CENP-meta, an essential kinetochore kinesin required for the maintenance of metaphase chromosome alignment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 150:1-11
189. Zhou J, Panda D, Landen JW, Wilson L, Joshi HC. 2002. Minor alteration of microtubule dynamics causes loss of tension across kinetochore pairs and activates the spindle checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 25:25