Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 141, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1181-1191

  Waters, Jennifer C ^a   Chen, Rey Huei ^b,c   Murray, Andrew W ^b   Salmon, E D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; EPITOPE; INHIBITOR PROTEIN; NOCODAZOLE; PACLITAXEL; POLYCLONAL ANTIBODY;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; KIDNEY CELL; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; RAT; TENSION;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; MACROPODIDAE; METAPHASE; MICROINJECTIONS; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PACLITAXEL;

ANIMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0032101688     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1181     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alexander, S.P., and C.L. Rieder. 1991. Chromosome motion during attachment to the vertebrate spindle: Initial saltatory-like behavior of chromosomes and quantitative analysis of force production by nascent kinetochore fibers. J. Cell Biol. 113:805-815.
2. Brinkley, B.R., and J. Cartwright. 1971. Ultrastructural analysis of mitotic spindle elongation in mammalian cells in vitro: Direct microtubule counts. J. Cell Biol. 93:33-48.
3. Brues, A.M., and A. Cohen. 1936. Effects of colchicine and related substances on cell division. Biochem. J. 30:1363-1368.
4. Cassimeris, L., C.L. Rieder, G. Rupp, and E.D. Salmon. 1990. Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells. J. Cell Sci. 96:9-15.
5. Campbell, M.S., and G.J. Gorbsky. 1995. Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 129:1195-1204.
6. Chen, R-H., J.C. Waters, E.D. Salmon, and A.W. Murray. 1996. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMad2 with unattached kinetochores. Science. 274:242-246.
7. DeBrabander, M., G. Geuens, R. Nuydens, R. Willenbrords, F. Aerts, and J. DeMey. 1986. Microtubule dynamics during the cell cycle: effects of taxol and nocodazole on the microtubule system of PtK2 cells at different stages on the mitotic cycle. Int. Rev. Cytol. 101:215-274.
8. Gorbsky, G.J., and W.A. Ricketts. 1993. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122:1311-1321.
9. Gorbsky, G.J., R.-H. Chen, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into normal mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase. 141:1193-1205.
10. He, X., T.E. Patterson, and S. Sazer. 1997. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:7965-7970.
11. Houchmandzadeh, B., J.F. Marko, D. Chatenay, and A. Libchaber. 1997. Elasticity and structure of eukaryote chromosomes studied by micromanipulation and micropipette aspiration. J. Cell Biol. 139:1-12.
12. Hoyt, M.A., L. Trotis, and B.T. Roberts. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 66:507-517.
13. Hwang, L.H., L.F. Lau, D.L. Smith, C.A. Mistrot, K.G. Hardwick, E.S. Hwang, A. Amon, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science. 279:1041-1044.
14. Jordan, M.A., R.J. Toso, D. Thrower, and L. Wilson. 1993. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:9552-9556.
15. Li, R., and A.W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 66:519-531.
16. Li, X., and R.B. Nicklas. 1995. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature. 373:630-632.
17. Li, Y., and R. Benezra. 1996. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMad2. Science. 274:246-248.
18. Li, Y., C. Gorbea, D. Mahaffey, M. Rechsteiner, and R. Benezra. 1997. MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:12431-12436.
19. 1 cells and its implication for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 137: 1567-1580.
20. McIntosh, J.R. 1991. Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 56:613-619.
21. Mitchison, T.J., and E.D. Salmon. 1992. Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 119:569-582.
22. Nicklas, R.B. 1988. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17:431-449.
23. Nicklas, R.B. 1997. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science. 275:632-637.
24. Nicklas, R.B., S.C. Ward, and G.J. Gorbsky. 1995. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130:929-939.
25. Rieder, C.L., and E.D. Salmon. 1994. Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 124:223-233.
26. Rieder, C.L., A. Schultz, R. Cole, and G. Sluder. 1994. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-1310.
27. Rieder, C.L., R.W. Cole, A. Khodjakov, and G. Sluder. 1995. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130:941-948.
28. Rudner, A.D., and A.W. Murray. 1996. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:773-780.
29. Spencer, F., and P. Hieter. 1992. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:8909-8912.
30. Taylor, S.S., and F. McKeon. 1997. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to unattached kinetochores. Cell. 89:727-735.
31. Wang, Y., and D.J. Burke. 1995. Checkpoint genes required to delay cell division in response to nocodazole respond to impaired kinetochore function in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6834-6844.
32. Waterman-Storer, C.M., and E.L.F. Holzbaur. 1996. The product of the Drosophila Gene, Glued, is the functional homologue of the p150glued component of the vertebrate dynactin complex. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1153-1159.
33. Waters, J.C., R.V. Skibbens, and E.D. Salmon. 1996a. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109:2823-2831.
34. Waters, J.C., T.J. Mitchison, C.L. Rieder and E.D. Salmon. 1996b. Kinetochore microtubule poleward flux produces a force that can do work. Mol. Biol. Cell. 7:1547-1558.
35. Wells, W.A.E., and A.W. Murray. 1996. Aberrantly segregating centromeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 133: 75-84.
36. Zhai, Y., P.J. Kronebusch, and G.G. Borisy. 1995. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J. Cell Biol. 131:721-734.