Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 2, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 492-499

  Tanaka, Tomoyuki ^a   Fuchs, Jörg ^b   Loidl, Josef ^b   Nasmyth, Kim ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; SISTER CHROMATID;

ANAPHASE; ARTIFACTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA REPLICATION; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENE DELETION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICROTUBULES; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; OPERATOR REGIONS (GENETICS); PHOSPHOPROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TANDEM REPEAT SEQUENCES; TIME FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0000818409     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35019529     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bickel, S. E. & Orr-Weaver, T. L. Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. BioEssays 18, 293-300 (1996).
2. Miyazaki, W. Y. & Orr-Weaver, T. L. Sister-chromatid cohesion in mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28, 167-187 (1994).
3. Nasmyth, K. Separating sister chromatids. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 98-104 (1999).
4. Guacci, V., Koshland, D. & Strunnikov, A. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91, 47-57 (1997).
5. Michaelis, C., Ciosk, R. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91, 35-45 (1997).
6. Toth, A. et al. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p (Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 13, 320-333 (1999).
7. Losada, A., Hirano, M. & Hirano, T. Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev. 12, 1986-1997 (1998).
8. Uhlmann, F. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 8, 1095-1101 (1998).
9. Skibbens, R. V., Corson, L. B., Koshland, D. & Hieter, P. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 13, 307-319 (1999).
10. Tanaka, K. et al. Fission yeast Eso1p is required for establishing sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 3459-3469 (2000).
11. Ciosk, R. et al. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5, 243-254 (2000).
12. Furuya, K., Takahashi, K. & Yanagida, M. Faithful anaphase is ensured by Mis 4, a sister chromatid cohesion molecule required in S phase and not destroyed in G1 phase. Genes Dev. 12, 3408-3418 (1998).
13. Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F. & Nasmyth, K. Sister chromatid separation at anaphase onset promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scclp. Nature 400, 37-42 (1999).
14. Nasmyth, K., Peters, J-M. & Uhlmann, F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science 288, 1379-1384 (2000).
15. Ciosk, R. et al. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93, 1067-1076 (1998).
16. Kumada, K. et al. Cut1 is loaded onto the spindle by binding to Cut2 and promotes anaphase spindle movement upon Cut2 proteolysis. Curr. Biol. 8, 633-641 (1998).
17. Cohen-Fix, O., Peters, J. M., Kirschner, M. W. & Koshland, D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 10, 3081-3093 (1996).
18. Funabiki, H. et al. Cut2 proteolysis required for sister-chromatid seperation in fission yeast. Nature 381, 438-441 (1996).
19. Kim, S. H., Lin, D. P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A. & Matsumoto, T. Fission yeast slp1: An effector of Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045-1047 (1998).
20. Hwang, L. H. et al. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044 (1998).
21. Lim, H. H.,Goh, P. Y. & Surana, U. Cdc20 is essential for the cyclosome-mediated proteolysis of both Pds1 and Clb2 during M phase in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 8, 231-234 (1998).
22. Fang, G., Yu, H. & Kirschner, M. W. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12, 1871-1883 (1998).
23. Shirayama, M., Zachariae, W., Ciosk, R. & Nasmyth, K. The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/Fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17, 1336-1349 (1998).
24. Zachariae, W. & Nasmyth, K. Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 13, 2039-2058 (1999).
25. Visintin, R., Prinz, S. & Amon, A. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278, 460-463 (1997).
26. Tanaka, T., Cosma, M. P., Wirth, K. & Nasmyth, K. Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98, 847-858 (1999).
27. Megee, P. C., Mistrot, C., Guacci, V. & Koshland, D. The centromeric sister chromatid cohesion site directs Mcd1p binding to adjacent sequences. Mol. Cell 4, 445-450 (1999).
28. Blat, Y. & Kleckner, N. Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98, 249-259 (1999).
29. Goshima, G. & Yanagida, M. Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100, 619-633 (2000).
30. Guacci, V., Hogan, E. & Koshland, D. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125, 517-530 (1994).
31. Knop, M. et al. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15, 963-972 (1999).
32. Goh, P. Y. & Kilmartin, J. V. NDC 10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 121, 503-512 (1993).
33. Hyman, A. A. & Sorger, P. K. Structure and function of kinetochores in budding yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 471-495 (1995).
34. Baum, P., Yip, C., Goetsch, L. & Byers, B. A yeast gene essential for regulation of spindle pole duplication. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 5386-5397 (1988).
35. Inoue, S. & Salmon, E. D. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1619-1640 (1995).
36. Skibbens, R. V., Skeen, V. P. & Salmon, E. D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 80, 674-691 (1993).
37. Nicklas, R. B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632-637 (1997).
38. Waters, J. C., Skibbens, R. V. & Salmon, E. D. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2823-2831 (1996).
39. Straight, A. F., Belmont, A. S., Robinett, C. C. & Murray, A. W. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6, 1599-1608 (1996).
40. Straight, A. F., Marshall, W. F., Sedat, J. W. & Murray, A. W. Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. Science 277, 574-578 (1997).
41. Scherthan, H., Loidl, J., Schuster, T. & Schweizer, D. Meiotic chromosome condensation and pairing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae studied by chromosome painting. Chromosoma 101, 590-595 (1992).
42. He, X., Asthana, S. & Sorger, P. K. Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101, 763-775 (2000).
43. Nabeshima, K. et al. Dynamics of centromeres during metaphase-anaphase transition in fission yeast: Dis1 is implicated in force balance in metaphase bipolar spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3211-3225 (1998).
44. Winey, M. et al. Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1601-1615 (1995).
45. Hirano, T. SMC-mediated chromosome mechanics: a conserved scheme from bacteria to vertebrates? Genes Dev. 13, 11-19 (1999).
46. Rieder, C. L. & Cole, R. Chromatid cohesion during mitosis: lessons from meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 112, 2607-2613 (1999).
47. Pidoux, A. L. & Allshire, R. B. Centromeres: getting a grip of chromosome. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 308-319 (2000).
48. Jin, Q.-w., Fuchs, J. & Loidl, J. Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1903-1912 (2000).
49. Thierry, A., Gaillon, L., Galibert, F. & Dujon, B. Construction of a complete genomic library of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and physical mapping of chromosome XI at 3.7 kb resolution. Yeast 11, 121-135 (1995).
50. Loidl, J., Klein, F. & Engebrecht, J. in Nuclear Structure and Function (ed. Berrios, M.) 257-285 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).