How usability can save the day - Methodological considerations for making automated driving a success story

Proceedings - 10th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2018

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 278-290

  Forster, Yannick ^a   Hergeth, Sebastian ^a   Naujoks, Frederik ^a   Krems, Josef F ^b  

^a BMW GROUP   (Germany)

^b CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Measure review; Method development; Method recommendations; Preference performance dissociation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DISSOCIATION;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; LITERATURE REVIEWS; METHOD DEVELOPMENT; METHOD RECOMMENDATIONS; MULTI-METHOD APPROACH; OBSERVATIONAL DATA;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85055986134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3239060.3239076     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (116)

1. Hillary Abraham, Bobbie Seppelt, Bruce Mehler, and Bryan Reimer. What's in a Name. In Boll, Pfleging et al. (Hg.) - the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Vehicular Applications, 226-234.
2. Emeli Adell, Lena Nilsson, and Amdrás Várhelyi. 2014. How is acceptance measured? Overview of Measurement Issues, Methods and Tools. Driver Acceptance of new technology. Theory, Measurement and optimisation, 73-89.
3. Icek Ajzen. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control. Springer, 11-39.
4. Anthony D. Andre and Christopher D. Wickens. 1995. When users want what's not best for them. Ergonomics in design 3, 4, 10-14.
5. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies 4, 3, 114-123.
6. Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Alexander Eriksson, Bastiaan Petermeijer, and Joost de Winter. 2017. Usefulness and satisfaction of take-over requests for highly automated driving. Road Safety & Simulation International Conference (RSS 2017), the Hague, Netherlands.
7. Matthias Beggiato, Marta Pereira, Tibor Petzoldt, and Josef Krems. 2015. Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 35, 75-84.
8. Patricia Böhm, Martin Kocur, Murat Firat, and Daniel Isemann. Which Factors Influence Attitudes Towards Using Autonomous Vehicles? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
9. John Brooke. 1996. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 194, 189.
10. Nora Broy, Mengbing Guo, Stefan Schneegass, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. Introducing novel technologies in the car. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 179-186.
11. Markus Bühner. 2011. Einführung in die Test-und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson Deutschland GmbH.
12. John T. Cacioppo and Richard E. Petty. 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, 1, 116.
13. Paul T. Costa and Robert R. MacCrae. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated.
14. Fred D. Davis. 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS quarterly 13, 3, 319.
16. DIN-EN ISO. 2011. Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion - Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme, 9241-210.
17. Thomas A. Dingus, Sheila G. Klauer, Vicki L. Neale, A. Petersen, Suzanne E. Lee, J. D. Sudweeks, M. A. Perez, J. Hankey, D. J. Ramsey, and S. Gupta. 2006. The 100-car naturalistic driving study, Phase II-results of the 100-car field experiment.
18. Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. 2006. Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems. Washington, DC: Alliance of Automobile Manufactures.
19. Andrew T. Duchowski. 2007. Eye tracking methodology. Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Springer, London.
20. Armin Eichinger. 2011. Untersuchungskonzepte für die Evaluation von Systemen zur Erkennung des Fahrerzustands: BASt-Forschungsbericht: FE 82.369/2009. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, 45-94.
21. Alexander Eriksson and Neville A. Stanton. 2017. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control. Human factors 59, 4, 689-705.
22. Sebastian Feuerstack, Bertram Wortelen, Carmen Kettwich, and Anna Schieben. Theater-system Technique and Model-based Attention Prediction for the Early Automotive HMI Design Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 19-22.
23. Yannick Forster, Johannes Kraus, Sophie Feinauer, and Martin Baumann. 2018. Calibration of trust expectancies in highly automted driving by brand, reliability information and introductionary videos. An online study. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
24. Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, and Alexandra Neukum. Your Turn or My Turn? Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 253-260.
25. Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, and Alexandra Neukum. 2017. Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2017 IEEE. IEEE, Redondo Beach, California, USA.
26. Mathilde François, François Osiurak, Alexandra Fort, Philippe Crave, and Jordan Navarro. 2016. Automotive HMI design and participatory user involvement: review and perspectives. Ergonomics 60, 4, 541-552.
27. Thomas Franke, Christiane Attig, and Daniel Wessel. 2018. A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction. Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 9, 1-12.
28. Thomas Franke, Maria Trantow, Madlen Günther, Josef F. Krems, Viktoria Zott, and Andreas Keinath. Advancing electric vehicle range displays for enhanced user experience. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 249-256.
29. Thomas Friedrichs, Shadan. S. Borojeni, Wilko Heuten, Andreas Lüdtke, and Susanne Boll. PlatoonPal: User-Centered Development and Evaluation of an Assistance System for Heavy-Duty Truck Platooning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 269-276.
30. Thomas Friedrichs, Marie-Christin. Ostendorp, and Andreas Lüdtke. Supporting Drivers in Truck Platooning: Development and Evaluation of Two Novel Human-Machine Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 277-284.
31. Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Schartmüller. Driving Hotzenplotz: A Hybrid Interface for Vehicle Control Aiming to Maximize Pleasure in Highway Driving. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 236-244.
32. Erik Frokjær, Morten Hertzum, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2000. Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
33. Günther Gediga, Kai-Christoph Hamborg, and Ivo Düntsch. 1999. The IsoMetrics usability inventory: an operationalization of ISO 9241-10 supporting summative and formative evaluation of software systems. Behaviour & information technology 18, 3, 151-164.
34. Mahtab Ghazizadeh, John D. Lee, and Linda N. Boyle. 2012. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work 14, 1, 39-49.
35. Christian Gold, Daniel Damböck, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1.
36. Christian Gold, Moritz Körber, Christoph Hohenberger, David Lechner, and Klaus Bengler. 2015. Trust in automation-Before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 3025-3032.
37. Jan Gugenheimer, Florian Schaub, Gregory M. Neiswander, Eromi Guneratne, and Michael Weber. User Authentication for Rotary Knob Controlled In-car Applications. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 1-8.
38. Marc Hassenzahl. 2003. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology. Springer Netherlands, 31-42.
39. Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & Computer 2003. Springer, 187-196.
40. Sebastian Hergeth, Lutz Lorenz, and Josef F. Krems. 2017. Prior familiarization with takeover requests affects drivers' takeover performance and automation trust. Human factors 59, 3, 457-470.
41. Sebastian Hergeth, Lutz Lorenz, Roman Vilimek, and Josef F. Krems. 2016. Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human factors 58, 3, 509-519.
42. Maximilian Hipp, Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. Ambient Park Assist: Supporting Reverse Parking Maneuvers with Ambient Light. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 45-50.
43. Philipp Hock, Johannes Kraus, Marcel Walch, Nina Lang, and Martin Baumann. Elaborating Feedback Strategies for Maintaining Automation in Highly Automated Driving. In Green, Boll et al. (Hg.) - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 105-112.
44. Kasper Hornbæk. 2006. Current practice in measuring usability. Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 2, 79-102.
45. Kasper Hornbæk and Effie L.-C. Law. 2007. Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures. CHI, San Jose, California, USA.
46. Robert. J. Jacob and Keith S. Karn. 2003. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind 2, 3, 4.
47. Jiun-Yin Jian, Ann M. Bisantz, and Colin G. Drury. 2000. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 1, 53-71.
48. George V. Kissel. 1995. The effect of computer experience on subjective and objective software usability measures. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, 284-285.
49. Gwendolin Knappe, Andreas Keinath, and Cristina Meinecke. 2006. Empfehlungen für die Bestimmung der Spurhaltegüte im Kontext der Fahrsimulation. MMi-interaktiv 11, 3-13.
50. Michael König and Lambert Neumayr. 2017. Users' resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 44, 42-52.
51. Oswald D. Kothgassner, Anna Felnhofer, Nathalie Hauk, Elisabeth Kastenhofer, Jasmine Gomm, and Ilse Kryspin-Exner. 2013. Technology Usage Inventory (TUI). Manual. Wien.
52. Johannes Kraus, Florian Nothdurft, Philipp Hock, David Scholz, Wolfgang Minder, and Martin Baumann. Human After All: Effects of Mere Presence and Social Interaction of a Humanoid Robot as a Co-Driver in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 129-134.
53. Johannes M. Kraus, Jessica Sturn, Julian E. Reiser, and Martin Baumann. Anthropomorphic agents, transparent automation and driver personality. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 8-13.
54. Justin Kruger and David Dunning. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 6, 1121.
55. Maria Kugler, Sebastian Osswald, Christopher Frank, and Markus Lienkamp. 2014. Mobility tracking system for CO2 footprint determination. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
56. Miltos Kyriakidis, Riender Happee, and Joost C. F. de Winter. 2015. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 32, 127-140.
57. Marc Landau, Sebastian Loehmann, and Moritz Koerber. Energy Flow: A Multimodal'Ready'Indication For Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
58. David R. Large, Victoria A. Banks, Catherine Harvey, and Gary Burnett. 2018. Towards a Predictive Model of Driver Acceptance of Active Collision Avoidance Systems. Proceedings of 7th Transport Research Arena TRA 2018, Vienna, Austria.
59. Felix Lauber, Claudius Böttcher, and Andreas Butz. You've Got the Look. In the 6th International Conference, 1-8.
60. Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held, and Martin Schrepp. 2008. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group.
61. Françoise D. Le Deist and Jonathan Winterton. 2005. What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International 8, 1, 27-46.
62. John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors 46, 1, 50-80.
63. Seul C. Lee, Hwan Hwangbo, and Yong G. Ji. 2016. Perceived Visual Complexity of In-Vehicle Information Display and Its Effects on Glance Behavior and Preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32, 8, 654-664.
64. Seul C. Lee and Yong G. Ji. 2018. Complexity of In-Vehicle Controllers and Their Effect on Task Performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1-10.
65. James R. Lewis. 2002. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 14, 3-4, 463-488.
66. James R. Lewis and Jeff Sauro. 2009. The factor structure of the system usability scale. International conference on human centered design.
67. Keenan R. May, Brittany E. Noah, and Bruce N. Walker. Driving Acceptance. Applying Structural Equation Modeling to In-Vehicle Automation Acceptance. In the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 190-194.
68. Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, Lee. Chaiwoo, David Kidd, and Ian Reagan. 2017. Considering self-report in the interpretation of objective performance data in the comparison of HMI systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Manchester Village, Vermont, USA.
69. Coleman Merenda, Hyungil Kim, Joseph L. Gabbard, Samantha Leong, David R. Large, and Gary Burnett. Did You See Me? Assessing Perceptual vs. Real Driving Gains Across Multi-Modal Pedestrian Alert Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 40-49.
70. Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Christine. Döttlinger, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. ChaseLight: ambient LED stripes to control driving speed. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
71. Barbara Metz, Andreas Landau, and Mariana Just. 2014. Frequency of secondary tasks in driving-Results from naturalistic driving data. Safety science 68, 195-203.
72. Michael Minge, Manfred Thüring, Ingmar Wagner, and Carina V. Kuhr. 2016. The meCUE Questionnaire: A Modular Tool for Measuring User Experience. In Advances in Ergonomics Modeling 2016, 115-128.
73. Alexander Mirnig, Philipp Wintersberger, Christine Sutter, and Juergen Ziegler. 2016. A framework for analyzing and calibrating trust in automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
74. Frederik Naujoks, Yannick Forster, Katharina Wiedemann, and Alexandra Neukum. 2016. Speech improves human-automation cooperation in automated driving. Mensch und Computer 2016-Workshopband.
75. Frederik Naujoks, Yannick Forster, Katharina Wiedemann, and Alexandra Neukum. 2017. Improving Usefulness of Automated Driving by Lowering Primary Task Interference through HMI Design. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2017.
76. Frederik Naujoks, Sebastian Hergeth, Andreas Keinath, Katharina Wiedemann, and Nadja Schömig. 2018. Use Cases for Assessing, Testing, and Validating the Human Machine Interface of Automated Driving Systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
77. Frederik Naujoks, Katharina Wiedemann, Nadja Schömig, Oliver Jarosch, and Christian Gold. 2018. Expert-based controllability assessment of control transitions from automated to manual driving. MethodsX 5, 579-592.
78. Michael Nees. 2016. Acceptance of Self-driving Cars: An Examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a Self-driving Cars Acceptance Scale. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
79. Alexandra Neukum, Tom Lübbecke, Hans-Peter Krüger, Christoph Mayser, and Joachim Steinle. 2008. ACC-Stop&Go: Fahrerverhalten an funktionalen Systemgrenzen. 5. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme-FAS.
80. Jakob Nielsen and Jonathan Levy. 1994. Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM 37, 4, 66-75.
81. Sina Nordhoff, Bart van Arem, and Riender Happee. 2016. Conceptual Model to Explain, Predict, and Improve User Acceptance of Driverless Podlike Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2602, 60-67.
82. Don Norman, Jim Miller, and Austin Henderson. 1995. What you see, some of what's in the future, and how we go about doing it: HI at Apple Computer. Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. ACM.
83. Donald A. Norman. 2005. Human-centered design considered harmful. interactions 12, 4, 14-19.
84. Ashley Nunes, Bryan Reimer, and Joseph F. Coughlin. 2018. People must retain control of autonomous vehicles. Nature 556, 7700, 169-171.
85. Jum C. Nunnally. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
86. Sebastian Osswald, Daniela Wurhofer, Sandra Trösterer, Elke Beck, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2012. Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
87. Thomas M. Ostrom. 1969. The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5, 1, 12-30.
88. Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors 39, 2, 230-253.
89. Ingrid Pettersson, Anna-Katharina Frison, Florian Lachner, Andreas Riener, and Jesper Nolhage. 2016. Triangulation in UX Studies. Learning from Experience. In the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication, 341-344.
90. Ingrid Pettersson, Florian Lachner, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Andreas Butz. 2018. A Bermuda Triangle? A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation. In the 2018 CHI Conference, 1-16.
91. Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo. 1986. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Leonard Berkowitz, Ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19. Academic Press, Orland (FL), 123-205.
92. Bastian Pfleging and Rang, Maurice, Broy, Nora. 2016. Investigating user needs for non-drivingrelated activities during automated driving. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing.
93. Matthew Pitts, Lee Skrypchuk, Alex Attridge, and Mark A. Williams. 2014. Comparing the User Experience of Touchscreen Technologies in an Automotive Application. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
94. Jonas Radlmayr, Christian Gold, Lutz Lorenz, Mehdi Farid, and Klaus Bengler. 2014. How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58, 1, 2063-2067.
95. Md M. Rahman, Mary F. Lesch, William J. Horrey, and Lesley Strawderman. 2017. Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. Accident; analysis and prevention 108, 361-373.
96. Maxwell J. Roberts, Hannah Gray, and Jennifer Lesnik. 2017. Preference versus performance. Investigating the dissociation between objective measures and subjective ratings of usability for schematic metro maps and intuitive theories of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98, 109-128.
97. Christina Rödel, Susanne Stadler, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Towards Autonomous Cars. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 1-8.
98. SAE. 2016. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, J3016R.
99. Johann Schrammel, Christina Köffel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2009. Personality traits, usage patterns and information disclosure in online communities. Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: Celebrating people and technology.
100. Stefan Schwarz, Sibylle Proschofski, and Alexander Meschtscherjakov. Playing Videos for Infants on the Rear Seat: An Evaluation of Different Approaches. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 161-166.
101. Jannik Spieker, Andreas Löcken, W. Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. SMALLCAR: A Scaled Model for Ambient Light Display Creation and Review of In-Vehicle Light Patterns. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 120-125.
102. James Sprinks, Jessica Wardlaw, Robert Houghton, Steven Bamford, and Jeremy Morley. 2017. Task Workflow Design and its impact on performance and volunteers' subjective preference in Virtual Citizen Science. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 104, 50-63.
103. Fabius Steinberger, Patrick Proppe, Ronald Schroeter, and Florian Alt. 2016. CoastMaster. An Ambient Speedometer to Gamify Safe Driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 83-90.
104. Sandra Trösterer, Daniela Wurhofer, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Using a parking assist system over time: Insights on acceptance and experiences. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
105. Ercan Tunca, Rene Fleischer, Ludger Schmidt, and Thomas Tille. 2016. Advantages of Active Haptics on Touch Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 137-144.
106. Jinke D. van der Laan, Adriaan Heino, and Dick de Waard. 1997. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 5, 1, 1-10.
107. Hanneke H. van Huysduynen, Jacques Terken, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Berry Eggen, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. Ambient Light and its Influence on Driving Experience. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 293-301.
108. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
109. Viswanath Venkatesh, James Y. L. Thong, and Xin Xu. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.
110. Frank M. F. Verberne, Jaap Ham, and Cees J. H. Midden. 2012. Trust in smart systems: Sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars. Human factors 54, 5, 799-810.
111. Dick de Waard. 1996. The measurement of drivers' mental workload. Doctoral Dissertation Univ. Groningen.
112. Marcel Walch, Martin Baumann, Lorenz Jaschke, Michael Weber, and Philipp Hock. 2017. Touch Screen Maneuver Approval Mechanisms for Highly Automated Vehicles: A First Evaluation. Adjunct Proceedings of the 9th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.
113. Guy H. Walker and Neville A. Stanton. 2017. Human factors in automotive engineering and technology. CRC Press.
114. Chao Wang, Jaques Terken, and Jun Hu. 2014. Liking other drivers' behavior while driving. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 1-6.
115. Adam Waytz, Joy Heafner, and Nicholas Epley. 2014. The mind in the machine. Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52, 113-117.
116. Mark P. Zanna and John K. Rempel. 1988. Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. The Social Psychology of Knowledge, 315-334.