How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2014-January, Issue , 2014, Pages 2063-2067

  Radlmayr, Jonas ^a   Gold, Christian ^a   Lorenz, Lutz ^b   Farid, Mehdi ^b   Bengler, Klaus ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b BMW GROUP   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVING SIMULATOR; HIGH-FIDELITY; N-BACK TASK; PRIMARY DRIVING TASKS; TRAFFIC DENSITIES; TRAFFIC SITUATIONS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 84923193984     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931214581434     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of Automation. Automatica, 19, pp. 775-779.
2. Bengler, K., Kohlmann, M., & Lange, C. (2012). Assessment of cognitive workload of in-vehicle systems using a visual peripheral and tactile detection task setting. WORK, 41, pp. 4919-4923.
3. Conti, A. S., Dlugosch, C., Vilimek, R., Keinath, A., & Bengler, K. (2012). An Assessment of Cognitive Workload using Detection Response Tasks. Proceedings 4th Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) International Conference. San Francisco, U.S.
4. Damböck, D., Farid, M., Tönert, L., & Bengler, K. (2012). Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Autofahren. 5. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. München.
5. Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 1988, 32, pp. 97-101.
6. Gasser, T. M., Arzt, C., Avoubi, M., Bartels, A., Eier, J., Flemisch, F., ⋯ Vogt, W. (2012). Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung. Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen.
7. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2013, 57, p. 1938.
8. Gold, C., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2014). Influence of automated brake application on take-over situations in highly automated driving scenarios. Proceedings of the FISITA 2014 World Automotive Congress. (in print).
9. Herrtwich, R. G. (2013). Autonomes Fahren - Die Perspektiven für einen Premium-Hersteller. Daimler AG.
10. ISO14198. (2012). Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Calibration tasks for methods which asses driver demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems. ISO/TS 14198:2012(en).
11. Merat, N., & Jamson, A. H. (2009). How do drivers behave in a highly automated car? Proceedings of the Fifth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design.
12. Merat, N., and Jamson., A. H., Lai, F., & Carsten, O. (2012). Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver State. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, pp. 762-771.
13. Rauch, N., Kassner, A., Krüger, H. P., Boverie, S., & Flemisch, F. (2009). The importance of driver state assessment within highly automated vehicles. Wuerzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences.
14. Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Wang, Y., & Coughlin, J. F. (2010). The Impact of Systematic Variation of Cognitive Demand on Drivers' Visual Attention across Multiple Age Groups. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting 2010.
15. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing Resources in Attention. In R. Parasuraman, & J. Davies, Varieties of Attention (pp. 63-102). New York: Academic Press.