Conceptual model to explain, predict, & improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vehicles

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2602, Issue , 2016, Pages 60-67

  Nordhoff, Sina ^a,b   Van Arem, Bart ^a   Happee, Riender ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b InnoZ Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change   (Germany)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED DRIVING; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DRIVERLESS; LEVEL 4; PILOT PROGRAMS; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; STEERING WHEEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; USERS' ACCEPTANCE;

VEHICLES;

EID: 85011573793     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2602-08     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Kyriakidis, M., R. Happee, and J. C. F. De Winter. Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5, 000 Respondents. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 32, 2015, pp. 127-140.
2. Google Self-Driving Car Project: Monthly Report: May 2015. http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/de//selfdrivingcar/files/reports/report-0515.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2015.
3. About CityMobil2. http://www.citymobil2.eu/en/About-CityMobil2/Overview/. Accessed Sept. 14, 2015.
4. Bell, L. Autonomous Vehicles Hit the Street in the UK's First "Driverless Pod" Trial. Inquirer, Feb. 11, 2015. http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2394681/autonomous-vehicles-hit-The-streets-in-The-uks-first-driverless-pod-Trial. Accessed June 2, 2015.
5. DAVI on the Roads. WEpods project: http://davi.connekt.nl/wepods-project/. Accessed May 9, 2015.
6. Alessandrini, A., A. Cattivera, C. Holguin, and D. Stam. CityMobil2: Challenges and Opportunities of Fully Automated Mobility. In Road Vehicle Automation: Lecture Notes In Mobility (G. Meyer and S. Beiker, eds.), Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 169-184.
7. Regan, M. A., T. Horberry, and A. Stevens. Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Overview. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimisation. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey, U.K., 2014, pp. 1-21.
8. Brookhuis, K. A., C. J. G. VanDriel, T. Hof, B. vanArem, and M. Hoedemaeker. Driving with a Congestion Assistant; Mental Workload and Acceptance. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1019-1025.
9. Van der Laan, J. D., A. Heino, and D. De Waard. A Simple Procedure for the Assessment of Acceptance of Advanced Transport Telematics. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1-10.
10. Payre, W., J. Cestac, and P. Delhomme. Intention to Use a Fully Automated Car: Attitudes and A Priori Acceptability. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 27, Part B, 2014, pp. 252-263.
11. Fraedrich, E., and B. Lenz. Gesellschaftliche und individuelle Akzeptanz des autonomen Fahrens. In Autonomes Fahren (M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, H. Winner, eds.), 2015, pp. 639-660.
12. Vilimek, R., and A. Keinath. User-Centred Design and Evaluation as a Prerequisite for the Success of Disruptive Innovations: An Electric Vehicle Case Study. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimization (M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, and A. Stevens, eds.), ARRB Group Limited, Vermont South, Victoria Australia, 2014, pp. 169-186.
13. Skippon, S., and M. Garwood. Responses to Battery Electric Vehicles: U.K. Consumer Attitudes and Attributions of Symbolic Meaning Following Direct Experience to Reduce Psychological Distance. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 16, 2011, pp. 525-531.
14. Power, J. D. 2012 U.S. Automotive Emerging Technologies Study Results. http://autos.jdpower.com/content/press-release/gGOwCnW/2012-u-s-Automotive-emerging-Technologies-study.htm. Accessed Mar. 17, 2014.
15. Power, J. D. 2013 U.S. Automotive Emerging Technologies Study Results. http://autos.jdpower.com/content/study-Auto/f85EfAp/2013-u-s-Automotive-emerging-Technologies-study-results.htm. Accessed March 17, 2014.
16. Power, J. D. 2014 U.S. Automotive Emerging Technologies Study Results. http://autos.jdpower.com/content/study-Auto/1N3SbRs/2014-u-s-Automotive-emerging-Technologies-study-results.html. Accessed Sept. 12, 2015.
17. Vallet, M. Survey: Drivers Ready to Trust Robot Cars? http://www.carinsurance.com/Articles/autonomous-cars-ready.aspx.ready.aspx. Accessed May 5, 2014.
18. Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. A Survey of Public Opinion About Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Report No. UMTRI-2014-21. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2014. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/108384/103024.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed Jan. 2, 2015.
19. Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. Motorists' Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation. Report No. UMTRI-2015-22. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2015. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/114386/103217.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed July 22, 2015.
20. KPMG. Self-Driving Cars: Are We Ready? http://www.kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/self-driving-cars-Are-we-ready.pdf. Accessed May 5, 2014.
21. Sommer, K. Mobility Study 2013. http://www.continental-corporation.com/www/download/pressportal-jp-jp/general/ov-Automated-driving-jp/ov-mobility-study-jp/download-channel/pres-mobility-study-jp.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2014.
22. Continental. Continental Mobility Study 2015. https://www.contionline.com/www/download/pressportal-com-en/themes/initiatives/chanel-mobility-study-en/ov-mobility-study2015-en/download-channel/mobistud2015-praesentation-en.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2015.
23. Begg, D. A 2050 Vision for London: What Are the Implications of Driverless Transport? 2014. http://www.transporttimes.co.uk/Admin/uploads/64165-Transport-Times-A-2050-Vision-for-London-AW-WEB-READY.pdf. Accessed Sept. 3, 2014.
24. Casley, S. V., A. S. Jardim, and A. M. Quartulli. A Study of Public Acceptance of Autonomous Cars. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass. http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-043013-155601/unrestricted/A-Study-Of-Public-Acceptance. Accessed June 8, 2014.
25. Howard, D., and D. Dai. Public Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
26. TNS Opinion and Social. Special Eurobarometer 427: Autonomous Systems. 2015.
27. Kockelman, K. M., P. Bansal, and A. Singh. Assessing Public Acceptance of and Interest in the New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 67, 2016, pp. 1-14.
28. Seapine Software. Study Finds 88% of Adults Would Be Worried About Riding in a Driverless Car. 2014. http://www.seapine.com/pr.php?id=217. Accessed Aug. 15, 2014.
29. Missel, J. Ipsos MORI Loyalty Automotive Survey. 2014. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3427/Only-18-per-cent-of-Britons-believe-driverless-cars-To-be-An-important-development-for-The-car-industry-To-focus-on.aspx?utm-campaign-cmp-325684&utm-source=getanewsletter. Accessed July 12, 2015.
30. ACV Automobil-Club Verkehr. ACV Akzeptanzstudie: Autonomes Fahren. http://www.acv.de/uploads/2015/02/acv-Akzeptanzstudie-Autonomes-fahren.pdf. Accessed Sept. 13, 2015.
31. Bazilinskyy, P., M. Kyriakidis, and J. De Winter. An Internal Crowdsourcing Study into People's Statements on Fully Automated Driving. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 2534-2542.
32. Cyganski, R., E. Fraedrich, and B. Lenz. Travel-Time Valuation for Automated Driving: A Use-Case-Driven Study. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
33. Schade, J., and B. Schlag. Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing Strategies. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, pp. 45-61.
34. Adell, E., A. Várhelyi, and L. Nilsson. The Definition of Acceptance and Acceptability. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimization (M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, and A. Stevens, eds.), ARRB Group Limited, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia, 2014, pp. 11-21.
35. Adell, E., A. Várhelyi, and L. Nilsson. Modeling Acceptance of Driver Assistance Systems: Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimization (M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, and A. Stevens, eds.), ARRB Group Limited, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia, 2014, pp. 23-34.
36. Adell, E., A. Várhelyi, and L. Nilsson. How Is Acceptance Measured? Overview of Measurement Issues, Methods and Tools. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimization (M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, and A. Stevens, eds.), ARRB Group Limited, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia, 2014, pp. 73-88.
37. Vlassenroot, S., and K. Brookhuis. Socio-Psychological Factors That Influence Acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems: A Model. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimization (M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, and A. Stevens, eds.), ARRB Group Limited, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia, 2014, pp. 35-50.
38. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478.
39. Kent, J. Driving to Save Time or Saving Time to Drive? The Enduring Appeal of the Private Car. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 65, 2014, pp. 103-115.
40. Rödel, C., S. Stadler, A. Meschtscherjakov, and M. Tscheligi. Toward Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience. In Automotive UI '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2014, pp. 1-8.
41. Choi, J. K., and Y. G. Ji. Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2015.
42. McDonald, M. User Needs Analysis for Automated Urban Transport Systems-A Qualitative Approach. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Madrid, Spain, 2003.
43. Yap, M., G. Correia, and B. van Arem. Valuation of Travel Attributes for Using Automated Vehicles as Egress Transport of Multimodal Train Trips. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 10, pp. 462-471.
44. Körber, M., and K. Bengler. Potential Individual Differences Regarding Automation Effects in Automated Driving. Interacción '14: Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Tenerife, Spain, September 2014.
45. Rudin-Brown, C. M., and H. A. Parker. Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC): Implications for Preventive Strategies. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 7, 2004, pp. 59-76.
46. Diels, C., and J. E. Bos. Self-Driving Carsickness. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 53, Part B, March 2016, pp. 374-382.
47. Sivak, M., and B. Schoettle. Motion Sickness in Self-Driving Vehicles. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/111747/103189.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed February 25, 2016.