Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and from Manual Control

Human Factors

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 689-705

  Eriksson, Alexander ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

automated driving; automation; control transitions; driving performance; takeover requests; task regulation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURE; HIGHWAY PLANNING; MANUAL CONTROL; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; INTER-INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; TAKEOVER REQUESTS; TASK REGULATION; VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS;

AUTOMATION;

AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVER; HIGHWAY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PUBLICATION; SAFETY; WORKLOAD; ADULT; ATTENTION; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; WORKLOAD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85015845074     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720816685832     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Audi. (2014). Audi piloted driving. Retrieved from http://www.audi.com/com/brand/en/vorsprung-durch-technik/content/2014/10/piloted-driving.html
2. Bainbridge L., (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775-779.
3. Banks V. A., Stanton N. A., (2015). Contrasting models of driver behaviour in emergencies using retrospective verbalisations and network analysis. Ergonomics, 58, 1337-1346.
4. Banks V. A., Stanton N. A., (2016). Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future. Applied Ergonomics, 53, 389-395.
5. Belderbos C., (2015). Authority transition interface: A human machine interface for taking over control from a highly automated truck. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
6. BMW. (2013). ConnectedDrive. Retrieved from http://www.bmw.co.uk/en-GB/topics/ownership/connecteddrive/highly-automated-driving.html
7. Byers J. C., Bittner A., Hill S., (1989). Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary. In Mital A., (Ed.), Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety I (pp. 481-485). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
8. Cooper J. M., Vladisavljevic I., Medeiros-Ward N., Martin P. T., Strayer D. L., (2009). An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability. Human Factors, 51, 261-268.
9. Cranor L. F., (2008,). A framework for reasoning about the human in the loop. Paper presented at the Conference on Usability, Psychology, and Security, San Francisco, CA.
10. Damböck D., Bengler K., Farid M., Tönert L., (2012). Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren. [ Takeover times for highly automated driving ]. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, 15, 16-28.
11. Desmond P. A., Hancock P. A., Monette J. L., (1998). Fatigue and automation-induced impairments in simulated driving performance. Human Performance, User Information, and Highway Design, 1628, 8-14.
12. Dogan E., Deborne R., Delhomme P., Kemeny A., Jonville P., (2014,). Evaluating the shift of control between driver and vehicle at high automation at low speed: The role of anticipation. Paper presented at the Transport Research Arena 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment, Paris, France.
13. Endsley M. R., Kaber D. B., (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462-492.
14. Eriksson A., Lindström A., Seward A., Seward A., Kircher K., (2014). Can user-paced, menu-free spoken language interfaces improve dual task handling while driving? In Kurosu M., (Ed.), Human-computer interaction: Advanced interaction modalities and techniques (pp. 394-405). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
15. Eriksson A., Spychala A., De Winter J. C. F., Stanton N. A., (2016,). A highly automated driving algorithm implementation on STISIM. Paper presented at the Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, Orlando. FL.
16. Eriksson A., Stanton N. A., (2016,). The chatty co-driver: A linguistics approach to human-automation-interaction. Paper presented at the Ergonomics and Human Factors 2016 Conference, Staverton Park, Daventry, Northamptonshire.
17. Feldhütter A., Gold C., Schneider S., Bengler K., (2016,). How the duration of automated driving influences take-over performance and gaze behavior. Paper presented at Arbeit in komplexen Systemen-Digital, vernetzt, human?! 62. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft, Aachen, Germany.
18. Fisher D. L., Rizzo M., Caird J., Lee J. D., (2011). Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine, and psychology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
19. Gold C., Damböck D., Lorenz L., Bengler K., (2013). "'Take over!' How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?" In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting (pp. 1938-1942). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20. Gold C., Korber M., Lechner D., Bengler K., (2016). Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density. Human Factors, 58, 642-652.
21. Gold C., Lorenz L., Bengler K., (2014,). Influence of automated brake application on take-over situations in highly automated driving scenarios. Paper presented at the FISITA 2014 World Automotive Congress, Maastricht, Netherlands.
22. Hart S. G., Staveland L. E., (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139-183.
23. Hubert M., Vandervieren E., (2008). An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 5186-5201.
24. Intelligent drive concept for new Mercedes-Benz GLC. (2015). Safecarnews.com. Retrieved from http://safecarnews.com/intelligent-drive-concept-for-new-mercedes-benz-glc-ju6145/
25. Kaber D. B., Endsley M. R., (1997). Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Safety Progress, 16, 126-131.
26. Kerschbaum P., Lorenz L., Bengler K., (2015). A transforming steering wheel for highly automated cars. In 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). doi: 10.1109/IVS.2015.7225893
27. Kircher K., Larsson A., Hultgren J. A., (2014). Tactical driving behavior with different levels of automation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15, 158-167.
28. Körber M., Gold C., Lechner D., Bengler K., (2016). The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 39, 19-32.
29. Körber M., Weißgerber T., Kalb L., Blaschke C., Farid M., (2015). Prediction of take-over time in highly automated driving by two psychometric tests. Dyna, 82, 195-201.
30. Lorenz L., Kerschbaum P., Schumann J., (2014). Designing take over scenarios for automated driving How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting (pp. 1681-1685). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
31. Louw T., Kountouriotis G., Carsten O., Merat N., (2015,). Driver inattention during vehicle automation: How does driver engagement affect resumption of control? Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Sydney, Australia.
32. Louw T., Merat N., Jamson H., (2015,). Engaging with highly automated driving: To be or not to be in the loop? Paper presented at the Eighth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Salt Lake City, Utah.
33. Lu Z., de Winter J. C. F., (2015). A review and framework of control authority transitions in automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2510-2517.
34. Melcher V., Rauh S., Diederichs F., Widlroither H., Bauer W., (2015). Take-over requests for automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2867-2873.
35. Merat N., Jamson A. H., Lai F. C., Carsten O., (2012). Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors, 54, 762-771.
36. Merat N., Jamson A. H., Lai F. C. H., Daly M., Carsten O. M. J., (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26 (Part A), 1-9.
37. Michon J. A., (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do? In Evans L., Schwing R. C., (Eds.), Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 485-519). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
38. Mok B., Johns M., Lee K. J., Miller D., Sirkin D., Ive P., Ju W., (2015,). Emergency, automation off: Unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Canary Islands, Spain.
39. Molloy R., Parasuraman R., (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311-322.
40. Naujoks F., Mai C., Nekum A., (2014,). The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distracted conditions. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Krakow, Poland.
41. Naujoks F., Nekum A., (2014). Timing of in-vehicle advisory warnings based on cooperative perception. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting. Available from http://hfes-europe.org
42. Nilsson J., (2014). Safe transitions to manual driving from faulty automated driving system. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
43. Payre W., Cestac J., Delhomme P., (2016). Fully automated driving: Impact of trust and practice on manual control recovery. Human Factors, 58, 229-241.
44. Petermeijer S. M., de Winter J. C. F., Bengler K. J., (2016). Vibrotactile displays: A survey with a view on highly automated driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17, 897-907.
45. Porter J. M., Case K., Marshall R., Gyi D., Sims R., (2004). "Beyond Jack and Jill": Designing for individuals using HADRIAN. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33, 249-264.
46. Radlmayr J., Gold C., Lorenz L., Farid M., Bengler K., (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting (pp. 2063-2067). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
47. Robinson T., Chan E., Coelingh E., (2010,). Operating platoons on public motorways: An introduction to the SARTRE Platooning Programme. Paper presented at the 17th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Busan, Korea.
48. SAE International. (2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (J3016-201609). Warrendale, PA: Author.
49. Schömig N., Hargutt V., Neukum A., Petermann-Stock I., Othersen I., (2015). The interaction between highly automated driving and the development of drowsiness. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 6652-6659.
50. Scott J., Gray R., (2008). A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Human Factors, 50, 264-275.
51. Stanton N. A., Dunoyer A., Leatherland A., (2011). Detection of new in-path targets by drivers using stop & go adaptive cruise control. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 592-601.
52. Stanton N. A., Marsden P., (1996). From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science, 24, 35-49.
53. Stanton N. A., Young M. S., (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48, 1294-1313.
54. Stanton N. A., Young M., McCaulder B., (1997). Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science, 27, 149-159.
55. Stanton N. A., Young M. S., Walker G. H., Turner H., Randle S., (2001). Automating the driver's control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 221-236.
56. Strand N., Nilsson J., Karlsson I. C. M., Nilsson L., (2014). Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27 (Part B), 218-228.
57. Summala H., (2000). Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 217-226.
58. Swaroop D., Rajagopal K. R., (2001). A review of constant time headway policy for automatic vehicle following. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (pp. 65-69). New York, NY: IEEE.
59. United Nations. (1968). Convention on road traffic: Amendment 1. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/crt1968e.pdf
60. van den Beukel A. P., van der Voort M. C,. (2013,). The influence of time-criticality on situation awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving. Paper presented at the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, the Hague, Netherlands.
61. Verboven S., Hubert M., (2005). LIBRA: A MATLAB library for robust analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 75, 127-136.
62. Walch M., Lange K., Baumann M., Weber M., (2015). Autonomous driving: Investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 11-18). New York, NY: ACM.
63. Walker G. H., Stanton N. A., Salmon P. M., (2015). Human factors in automotive engineering and technology. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
64. Willemsen D., Stuiver A., Hogema J., (2015,). Automated driving functions giving control back to the driver: A simulator study on driver state dependent strategies. Paper presented at the 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Gothenburg, Sweden.
65. Wolterink W. K., Heijenk G., Karagiannis G., (2011,). Automated merging in a cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) system. Paper presented at the Fifth ERCIM Workshop on eMobility, Catalonia, Spain.
66. Young M. S., Stanton N. A., (2002). Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors, 44, 365-375.
67. Young M. S., Stanton N. A., (2007). Back to the future: Brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics, 50, 46-58.
68. Zeeb K., Buchner A., Schrauf M., (2015). What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78, 212-221.
69. Zeeb K., Buchner A., Schrauf M., (2016). Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 92, 230-239.