Human after all: Effects of mere presence and social interaction of a humanoid robot as a co-driver in automated driving

AutomotiveUI 2016 - 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Adjunct Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 129-134

  Kraus, Johannes Maria ^a   Nothdurft, Florian ^a   Hock, Philipp ^a   Scholz, David ^a   Minker, Wolfgang ^a   Baumann, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Driver vehicle cooperation; Human robot interaction; NAO; Trust in automation

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; AUTOMATION; ROADS AND STREETS; ROBOTS; SOCIAL SCIENCES; USER INTERFACES;

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS; DRIVER-VEHICLE COOPERATION; DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY; GROUP DIFFERENCES; HUMANOID ROBOT NAO; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 85011976082     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3004323.3004338     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Heather M. Gray, Kurt Gray and Daniel M. Wegner. 2007. Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619.
2. Kevin A. Hoff and Masooda Bashir. 2015. Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57, 3: 407-434.
3. Jiun Y. Jian, Ann M. Bisantz and Colin G. Drury. 2000. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 1: 53-71.
4. John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 1: 50-80.
5. Masahiro Mori. 1970. The uncanny valley. Energy, 7, 4: 33-35.
6. Clifford Nass, B.J. Fogg and Youngme Moon. 1996. Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 543-559.
7. Richard Pak, Nicole Finka, Margaux Pricea, Brock Bassa and Lindsay Sturrea. 2012. Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 55, 9: 1059-1072.
8. Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39, 2: 230-253.
9. Robert Rosenthal. 1991. Metaanalytic procedures for social research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Adam Waytz, Joy Heafner and Nicholas Epley. 2014. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117.