Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 91-99

  Pfleging, Bastian ^a   Rang, Maurice ^a   Broy, Nora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b BMW GROUP   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automotive user interfaces; Highly automated driving; In vehicle interaction; Non driving related activities; Non driving related tasks

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS; USER INTERFACES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; IN-SITU OBSERVATIONS; NON-DRIVING-RELATED ACTIVITIES; NON-DRIVING-RELATED TASKS; PRODUCTION VEHICLES; TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS; UBIQUITOUS MULTIMEDIA; VEHICLE INTERACTIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85014870948     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3012709.3012735     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Nora Broy, Simone Höckh, Annette Frederiksen, Michael Gilowski, Julian Eichhorn, Felix Naser, Horst Jung, Julia Niemann, Martin Schell, Albrecht Schmid, and Florian Alt. 2014. Exploring Design Parameters for a 3D Head-Up Display. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611011.
2. Heiner Bubb. 2015. Das Regelkreisparadigma der Ergonomie. In Automobilergonomie, Heiner Bubb, Klaus Bengler, Rainer E. Grünen, and Mark Vollrath (Eds.). Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, 27-65. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-2297-0-2.
3. Rita Cyganski, Eva Fraedrich, and Barbara Lenz. 2015. Travel-Time Valuation for Automated Driving: A Use-Case-Driven Study. In Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. 11-15.
4. Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2013. Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Device. Federal Register 78, 81 (2013), 24817-24890. https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-09883.
5. Cyriel Diels and Jelte E. Bos. 2016. Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 53, Part B (2016), 374-382. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.009.
6. Christian Gold and Klaus Bengler. 2014. Taking Over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part II, Neville A. Stanton, Steven Landry, Giuseppe Di Bucchianico, and Andrea Vallicelli (Eds.). AHFE International, Winter Park, FL, USA, 64-69.
7. Christian Gold, Daniel Damböck, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57. 1938-1942DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433.
8. Renate Haeuslschmid, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2016. A Design Space to Support the Development of Windshield Applications for the Car. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5076-5091. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858336.
9. A. L. Kun, S. Boll, and A. Schmidt. 2016. Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (Jan 2016), 32-38. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2016.14.
10. Lutz Lorenz, Philipp Kerschbaum, and Josef Schumann. 2014. Designing take over scenarios for automated driving: How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 58. 1681-1685. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581351.
11. Detlev Mohr, Hans-Werner Kaas, Paul Gao, Andreas Zielke, Andreas Tschiesner, Dominik Wee, and Matthias Kässer. 2015. Competing for the connected customer. Technical Report. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.de/sites/mck-files/files/competing-for-the-connected-customer.pdf.
12. Todd Mozer. 2013. Speech's Evolving Role in Consumer Electronics. . .From Toys to Mobile. Springer New York, New York, NY, 23-34. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6018-3-2.
13. Jakob Nielsen and Jonathan Levy. 1994. Measuring Usability: Preference vs. Performance. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (April 1994), 66-75. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/175276.175282.
14. Bastian Pfleging and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. (Non-) Driving-Related Activities in the Car: Defining Driver Activities for Manual and Automated Driving. In Workshop on Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride at CHI '15. http://www.hcilab.org/wp-content/uploads/chi15-ws-nondriving-activities.pdf.
15. Bastian Pfleging, Stefan Schneegass, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Exploring User Expectations for Context and Road Video Sharing While Calling and Drivings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 132-139. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516547.
16. Jonas Radlmayr, Christian Gold, Lutz Lorenz, Mehdi Farid, and Klaus Bengler. 2014. How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58, 1 (2014), 2063-2067. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581434.
17. SAE International. 2014. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. Technical Report SAE J3016-201401. SAE International. http://standards.sae.org/j3016-201401/.
18. Brandon Schoettle and Michael Sivak. 2014. A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Technical Report UMTRI-2014-21. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108384.