Trust in Automation – Before and After the Experience of Take-over Scenarios in a Highly Automated Vehicle

Procedia Manufacturing

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 3025-3032

  Gold, Christian ^a   Körber, Moritz ^a   Hohenberger, Christoph ^a   Lechner, David ^a   Bengler, Klaus ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Driving simulation; Take over; Trust in automation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978205654     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23519789     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. [1] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013). Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. Washington DC.
2. [2] Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230-253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886.
3. [3] Muir, B.M., Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27:5 (1987), 527–539.
4. [4] Lee, J., Moray, N., Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine-systems. Ergonomics 35:10 (1992), 1243–1270.
5. [5] Muir, B.M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1905-1922. doi:10.1080/00140139408964957.
6. [6] Körber, M., & Bengler, K. (2014). Potential Individual Differences Regarding Automation Effects in Automated Driving. In C. S. González-González, C. Collazos Ordóñez, & H. Fardoun (Eds.), Interacción ‘14: Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1-7). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
7. [7] Stanton, N.A., & Young, M.S. (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48(10), 1294-1313. doi:10.1080/00140130500252990.
8. [8] Verberne, F.M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C.J. H. (2012). Trust in Smart Systems: Sharing Driving Goals and Giving Information to Increase Trustworthiness and Acceptability of Smart Systems in Cars. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 799-810. doi:10.1177/0018720812443825.
9. [9] Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., & Benlger, K. (2014). How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) 2014. Annual Meeting (Vol. 58, pp. 2063-2067).
10. [10] Gold, Christian; Damböck, Daniel; Lorenz, Lutz; Bengler, Klaus (2013): “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting September 2013 57: 1938-1942, doi: 10.1177/1541931213571433.
11. [11] Gold, Christian; Bengler, Klaus (2014): Taking Over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Kraków, Poland 19-23 July.
12. [12] Trübswetter, N., & Bengler, K. (2013). Why Should I Use ADAS? Advanced Driver Assistance System and the Elderly: Knowledge, Experience and Usage Barriers. In Proc. 7th Int. Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 495-501).
13. [13] Lee, J.D., & See, K.A. (2004). Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50-80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
14. [14] Hoff, K.A., & Bashir, M. (2014). Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi:10.1177/0018720814547570.
15. [15] Ho, G., Wheatley, D., & Scialfa, C.T. (2005). Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 690-710. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.007.
16. [16] Sanchez, J., Fisk, A.D., & Rogers, W.A. (2004). Reliability and Age-Related Effects on Trust and Reliance of a Decision Support Aid. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(3), 586-589. doi:10.1177/154193120404800366.
17. [17] Arndt, S. (2011). Evaluierung der Akzeptanz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen: Modell zum Kaufverhalten von, Endkunden, VS., research -, Verkehrspsychologie, V.S., Verl., für, Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden, in, press.,.
18. [18] Jian, J.Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4:1 (2000), 53–71.
19. [19] Wang, Y., Reimer, B., Dobres, J., & Mehler, B. (2014). The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 227-237. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.003.
20. [20] Hammel, K.R., Fisher, D.L., & Pradhan, A.K. (2002). Verbal and Spatial Loading Effects on Eye Movements in Driving Simulators: A Comparison to Real World Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46(26), 2174-2178. doi:10.1177/154193120204602615.
21. [21] Di Nocera, F., Camilli, M., & Terenzi, M. (2006). Using the Distribution of Eye Fixations to Assess Pilots’ Mental Workload. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(1), 63-65. doi:10.1177/154193120605000114.
22. [22] He, J., Becic, E., Lee, Y.-C., & McCarley, J.S. (2011). Mind Wandering Behind the Wheel: Performance and Oculomotor Correlates. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(1), 13-21. doi:10.1177/0018720810391530.
23. [23] Moore, K., & Gugerty, L. (2010). Development of a Novel Measure of Situation Awareness: The Case for Eye Movement Analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(19), 1650-1654. doi:10.1177/154193121005401961.
24. [24] Raj M. Ratwani, J. Malcolm McCurry, J. Gregory Trafton. (2010). Single operator, multiple robots: an eye movement based theoretic model of operator situation awareness. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010. 2-5 March 2010, Osaka, Japan. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
25. [25] Moray, N. (2000). Are Observers Ever Really Complacent When Monitoring Automated Systems? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(6), 592-595. doi:10.1177/154193120004400613.
26. [26] Pradhan, A.K., Hammel, K.R., DeRamus, R., Pollatsek, A., Noyce, D.A., & Fisher, D.L. (2005). Using Eye Movements To Evaluate Effects of Driver Age on Risk Perception in a Driving Simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(4), 840-852. doi:10.1518/001872005775570961.
27. [27] Richard, C.M., Brown, J.L., & McCallum, M. (2007). Crash warning system interfaces: human factors insights and lessons learned (No. HS-810 697). US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
28. [28] Muir, B.M. (1988), Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. In E. Hollnagel. G. Mancini, & D, D. Woods (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in complex dynamic worlds (pp. 71-83). London: Academic.