Did you see me? Assessing perceptual vs. real driving gains across multi-modal pedestrian alert systems

AutomotiveUI 2017 - 9th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 40-49

  Merenda, Coleman ^a   Kim, Hyungil ^a   Gabbard, Joseph L ^a   Leong, Samantha ^a   Large, David R ^b   Burnett, Gary ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Augmented Reality; Head Up Displays; Human Machine Interfaces; Pedestrian Alert Systems; Simulation; Visual Attention

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; USER INTERFACES;

HEAD UP DISPLAYS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; PEDESTRIAN ALERT SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; VISUAL ATTENTION;

BRAKING PERFORMANCE;

EID: 85032499347     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3122986.3123013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Administration, N.H.T.S., Traffic safety facts 2013 data. Rural/urban comparison. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, 2015.
2. Graves, F., et al., Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report. 2014.
3. Clifton, K.J., C.V. Burnier, and G. Akar, Severity of injury resulting from pedestrian-vehicle crashes: What can we learn from examining the built environment? Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 2009. 14(6): p. 425-436.
4. Beck, L.F., A.M. Dellinger, and M.E. O'neil, Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2007. 166(2): p. 212-218.
5. Yanagisawa, M., E. Swanson, and W.G. Najm, Target Crashes and Safety Benefits Estimation Methodology for Pedestrian Crash Avoidance/Mitigation Systems. 2014.
6. Mobileye Foward Collision Warning (FCW). [cited 2016 May 31]; Available from: http://www.mobileye.com/technology/applications/vehicledetection/ forward-colision-warning/.
7. Broggi, A., et al., A new approach to urban pedestrian detection for automatic braking. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2009. 10(4): p. 594-605.
8. Zhang, S., et al., How Far are We from Solving Pedestrian Detection? arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01237, 2016.
9. Dollar, P., et al., Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 2012. 34(4): p. 743-761.
10. Abe, G. and J. Richardson, Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied Ergonomics, 2006. 37(5): p. 577-586.
11. Large, D.R., Harvey, C., Burnett, G., Merenda, C., Leong, S., Gabbard, J. 2017, Exploring the relationship between false alarms and driver acceptance of a pedestrian alert system during simulated driving. Road Safety and Simulation International Conference 2017, 2017.
12. Källhammer, J.-E. and K. Smith, Assessing contextual factors that influence acceptance of pedestrian alerts by a night vision system. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2012. 54(4): p. 654-662.
13. Källhammer, J.-E., H. Toghyani, and K. Smith. A technique for evaluation of pedestrian warning conditions with high driver acceptance. in Proceedings. 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (Seoul, Republic of Korea). 2013.
14. Langham, M. and N. Moberly, Pedestrian conspicuity research: a review. Ergonomics, 2003. 46(4): p. 345-363.
15. Lubbe, N. and J. Davidsson, Drivers' comfort boundaries in pedestrian crossings: A study in driver braking characteristics as a function of pedestrian walking speed. Safety Science, 2015. 75: p. 100-106.
16. McCallum, M., Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System heavy truck driver vehicle interface (DVI) literature review. 2006.
17. De Boer, J., et al. The accuracy and timing of pedestrian warnings at intersections: The acceptance from drivers and their preferences. in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on. 2010. IEEE.
18. Lee, J.D., et al., Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002. 44(2): p. 314-334.
19. Lubbe, N., Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems. Journal of Safety Research, 2017. 61: p. 23-32.
20. Lee, J.D. and B.H. Kantowitz, Perceptual and cognitive aspects of intelligent transportation systems. Human factors in intelligent transportation systems, 1998.
21. Reader, N.T., Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems. 1999.
22. Liu, Y.-C. and M.-H. Wen, Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2004. 61(5): p. 679-697.
23. Sayer, T.B., J.R. Sayer, and J.M. Devonshire, Assessment of a driver interface for lateral drift and curve speed warning systems: mixed results for auditory and haptic warnings. Proceedings of Driving Assessment, 2005: p. 218-224.
24. Livingston, M.A., et al. Resolving multiple occluded layers in augmented reality. in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
25. Drascic, D. and P. Milgram. Perceptual issues in augmented reality. in Electronic Imaging: Science & Technology. 1996. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
26. Kim, H., et al. Look at Me: Augmented Reality Pedestrian Warning System Using an In-Vehicle Volumetric Head Up Display. in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2016. ACM.
27. Eyraud, R., E. Zibetti, and T. Baccino, Allocation of visual attention while driving with simulated augmented reality. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 2015. 32: p. 46-55.
28. Rane, P., et al. Virtual Road Signs: Augmented Reality Driving Aid for Novice Drivers. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2016. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
29. Kim, H., J.D. Isleib, and J.L. Gabbard. Virtual Shadow: Making Cross Traffic Dynamics Visible through Augmented Reality Head Up Display. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2016. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
30. Shneiderman, B., Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 2010: Pearson Education India.
31. Gabbard, J.L., G.M. Fitch, and H. Kim, Behind the Glass: Driver Challenges and Opportunities for AR Automotive Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2014. 102(2): p. 124-136.
32. Savino, M.R., Standardized names and definitions for driving performance measures. 2009, TUFTS UNIVERSITY.
33. Colley, A., et al. Insights from Deploying See- Through Augmented Reality Signage in the Wild. in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 2015. ACM.
34. Thoma, S., T. Lindberg, and G. Klinker, Evaluation of a generic warning for multiple intersection assistance systems. Human factors, security and safety, 2009: p. 173-188.
35. Campbell, J.L., et al., In-Vehicle Display Icons and other Information Elements. Volume I: Guidelines. 2004.
36. Huang, C.H., Chao, C. W., Tsai, T., & Hung, M. H, The Effects of Interface Design for Head-Up Display on Driver Behavior. Life Science Journal, 2013. 10(2): p. 2058-2065.
37. Campbell, J.L., et al., Crash warning system interfaces: human factors insights and lessons learned. 2007, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
38. Salvendy, G., Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 2012: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Keller, C.G. and D.M. Gavrila, Will the pedestrian cross? A study on pedestrian path prediction. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2014. 15(2): p. 494-506.
40. Hoffmann, E.R. and R.G. Mortimer, Drivers' estimates of time to collision. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1994. 26(4): p. 511-520.
41. Brooke, J., SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 1996. 189(194): p. 4-7.
42. Vagias, W.M., Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University, 2006.
43. Merenda, C., et al. Effects of real-world backgrounds on user interface color naming and matching in automotive AR HUDs. in Perceptual and Cognitive Issues in AR (PERCAR), IEEE VR Workshop on. 2016. IEEE.