Frequency of secondary tasks in driving - Results from naturalistic driving data

Safety Science

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 195-203

  Metz, Barbara ^a   Landau, Andreas ^a   Just, Mariana ^a  

^a WIVW GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distraction; Naturalistic driving

Indexed keywords

SAFETY TESTING;

DATA SET; DISTRACTION; DRIVING BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; NATURALISTIC DRIVING; SECONDARY TASKS; TIME SPENT; VIDEO ANALYSIS;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; HIGHWAY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; NATURALISTIC DRIVING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAFFIC SAFETY; TRAVEL; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 84899833454     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benmimoun, M., Pütz, A., Aust, M.L., Faber, F., Sanchez, D., Metz, B., et al., 2012. D6.1 Final Evaluation Results. Public Deliverable: euroFOT consortium.
2. Bruyas, M.-P., Fort, A., Lancelle, V., 2013. Effect of phone conversations on tactical components of the Driving Task. In: Paper Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention.
3. Caird J.K., Willness C.R., Scialfa C.T. A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008, 40:1282-1293.
4. Collet C., Guillot A., Petit C. Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies. Ergonomics 2010, 53(3):589-601.
5. Collet C., Guillot A., Petit C. Phoning while driving II: a review of driving conditions influence. Ergonomics 2010, 53(5):602-616.
6. Craft R.H., Preslopsky B. Distraction and inattention: top crash cause in the USA. Driver Distraction and Inattention Advances in Research and Countermeasures 2013, vol. 1. Ashgate, Surrey.
7. Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A., Lee, S.E., Sudweeks, J., et al., 2006. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment (Report No. DOT HS 810 593). Washington: National Highway Traffic Safety Admin. (NHTSA).
8. Fitch, G.M., Guo, F., Yang, Y., Soccolich, S., Perez, M., Hanowski, R.J., et al., 2013. The impact of hand-held and hands-free cell phone use on driving performance and safety-critical event risk. In: Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg.
9. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J., Ramsey, D., 2006. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash-Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-car Naturalistic Driving Study Data (Report No. DOT HS 810 594). Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
10. Metz, B., 2009. Worauf achtet der Fahrer? - Steuerung der Aufmerksamkeit beim Fahren mit visuellen Nebenaufgaben. Dissertation, Julius-Maximillians Universität, Würzburg.
11. Metz, B., Schoch, S., Rakic, M., Kuhn, F., 2010. Planning of a field operational test on navigation systems: implementation and evaluation of pre-studies providing background information for the data analysis. In: Paper presented at the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems.
12. Metz, B., Landau, A., Hargutt, V., Neukum, A., 2013. Naturalistic Driving Data - Re-Analyse von Daten aus dem EU-Projekt euroFOT.FAT-Schriftenreihe, vol. 256. Verband der Automobilindustrie.
13. Michon J.A. A critical view of drivers behaviour models: what do we know, what should we do?. Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety 1985, 485-519. Plenum Press, New York. L. Evans, R.C. Schwing (Eds.).
14. Regan, M., Mitsopoulos, E., 2001. Understanding Passenger Influences on Driver Behaviour: Implications for Road Safety and Recommendations for Countermeasure Development (Report No. 180): Monash University: Accident Research Centre.
15. Reiß, J., 1998. Das Unfallrisiko mit Beifahrern. PhD Thesis, University of Würzburg, Würzburg.
16. Sanchez, D., Garcia, E., Saez, M., Benmimoun, M., Pütz, A., Aust, M.L., et al., 2012. D6.3 Final results: User Acceptance and User-related aspects. Public deliverable: euroFOT consortium.
17. Sayer, J.R., Devonshire, J.M., Flannagan, C.A., 2005. The Effects of Secondary Tasks on Naturalistic Driving Performance (Report No. UMTRI-2005-29). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan.
18. Schoch, S., Guidotti, L., Csepinsky, A., Metz, B., Tadei, R., Tesauri, F., et al., 2011. D5.3 Final Delivery of Data and Answers to Questionnaires. Public Deliverable: euroFOT consortium.
19. Schömig N., Metz B. Three levels of situation awareness in driving with secondary tasks. Saf. Sci. 2013, 56:44-51.
20. Schömig N., Metz B., Krüger H.-P. Anticipatory and control processes in the interaction with secondary tasks while driving. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2011, 14(6):525-538.
21. Stutts, J. C., Reinfurt, D. W., Staplin, L., & Rodgman, E. A. (2001). The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes. Report, Chapel Hill: University of North Caroline Highway Safety Research Center.
22. Toole, L.M., Hanowski, R.J., Smith-Jackson, T.L., 2013. Towards understanding mobile device use in commercial motor vehicel drivers: do drivers interact as a drowsiness countermeasure? In: Paper presented at the 3rd Internation Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention.
23. Vollrath M., Meilinger T., Krüger H.-P. How the presence of passengers influences the risk of a collision with another vehicle. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2002, 34(5):649-654.