Theater-system technique and model-based attention prediction for the early automotive HMI design evaluation

AutomotiveUI 2016 - 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 19-22

  Feuerstack, Sebastian ^a   Wortelen, Bertram ^b   Kettwich, Carmen ^c   Schieben, Anna ^c  

^a OFFIS INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Model based attention prediction; Usability assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CRASHWORTHINESS; FORECASTING; THEATERS; USER INTERFACES;

DESIGN EVALUATION; EARLY DESIGN PHASE; MODEL BASED APPROACH; MODEL-BASED OPC; MODEL-BASED PREDICTION; QUALITATIVE STUDY; USABILITY ASSESSMENT; VISUAL ATTENTION;

DESIGN;

EID: 85011955346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3003715.3005466     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Thierry Bellet, Pierre Mayenobe, Jean-Charles Bornard, Dominique Gruyer, and Bernard Claverie. 2012. A computational model of the car driver interfaced with a simulation platform for future virtual human centred design applications: COSMO-SIVIC. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25, 7:1488-1504.
2. Sebastian Feuerstack and Bertram Wortelen. 2016. AM-DCT: A visual attention modeling data capturing tool for investigating users' interface monitoring behavior. In Proceedings of Working Conference on Advanced Visual interfaces 2016, Bari, Italy, June 7th-10th 2016.
3. William J Horrey, Christopher D Wickens, and Kyle P Consalus. 2006. Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 2:67.
4. J. F. Kelley. 1984. An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural-language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2:26-41.
5. Carmen Kettwich, Raphael Haus, Gerald Temme, and Anna Schieben. 2016. Validation of a HMI concept indicating the status of the traffic light signal in the context of automated driving in urban environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1374-1379.
6. Laurel Riek. 2012. Wizard of oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1:119-136.
7. Dario D. Salvucci. 2007. Integrated models of driver behavior. In Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, Wayne D. Gray, (ed). Oxford University Press, 356-367.
8. Gerrit Schmidt, Miklós Kiss, and Eckhard Babbel. 2008. Das Wizard of Oz Fahrzeug: ein Werkzeug für Rapid Prototyping und Usability Testing von zukünftigen Fahrerassistenzsystemen. In Proceedings of 3. Tagung Aktive Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz, Gar-ching, Germany, April 7-8 2008.
9. Anna Schieben, Matthias Heesen, Julian Schindler, Johann Kelsch, and Frank Flemisch. 2009. The theater-system technique: Agile designing and testing of system behavior and interaction, applied to highly automated vehicles. In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 43-46.
10. Christopher D. Wickens, John Helleberg, Juliana Goh, Xidong Xu, and William J. Horrey. 2001. Pilot task management: Testing an attentional expected value model of visual scanning. Technical Report ARL-01-14/NASA-01-7, University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab, Savoy, IL.
11. Bertram Wortelen, Martin Baumann, Andreas Lüdtke. 2013. Dynamic simulation and prediction of drivers' attention distribution. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 21:278-294.