Towards autonomous cars: The effect of autonomy levels on Acceptance and User Experience

AutomotiveUI 2014 - 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, in Cooperation with ACM SIGCHI - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Rödel, Christina ^a   Stadler, Susanne ^a   Meschtscherjakov, Alexander ^a   Tscheligi, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Autonomous driving; User experience

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; CONTROL THEORY; SURVEYS; USER EXPERIENCE; USER INTERFACES;

ACCEPTANCE; AUTONOMOUS DRIVING; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATIONS; ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE; PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL CONTROL; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; USER EXPERIENCES (UX);

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES;

EID: 85116180713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2667317.2667330     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 179-211.
2. Becker, S., Bork, M., Diriben, H.T., Geduld, G., and et al. Summary of Experience with Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control (AICC). In Proc. 1st World Congress on ATT and IVHS ERTICO, vol. 4 (1994).
3. Brookhuis, K., and de Waard, D. The Consequences of Automation for Driver Behaviour and Acceptance. In Proc. Int. Ergonomics Association (IEA) (2006).
4. Davis, F. D. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. PhD thesis, MIT, 1986.
5. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Applied Social Psychology 22, 14 (1992), 1111-1132.
6. de Waard, D., van der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., and Brookhuis, K. A. Driver Behavior in an Emergency Situation in the Automated Highway System. Transportation Human Factors 1, 1 (1999), 67-82.
7. Eckoldt, K., Knobel, M., Hassenzahl, M., and Schumann, J. An Experiential Perspective on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. Information Technology 54, 4 (2012), 165-171.
8. Eisele, K. Zukunftslabor für autonomes Fahren, Oct. 2013. http://technicity.daimler.com/zukunftslabor/?output=pdf.
9. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, 1975.
10. Google. Google self-driving car project, July 2014. http://plus.google.com/+GoogleSelfDrivingCars.
11. Hassenzahl, M. Experience Design. Technology for all the Right Reasons. Morgan & Claypool, 2010.
12. Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., and Davidsson, S. Presenting System Uncertainty in Automotive UIs for Supporting Trust Calibration in Autonomous Driving. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on AUI'13 (2013), 210-217.
13. Hoedemaeker, M. Behoeften, rijstijlen en meningen ten aanzien van automatische voertuig besturing (Needs, Driving Styles and Opinions towards Automated Driving). Tech. rep., Technical University Delft, 1996.
14. Höltl, A., and Trommer, S. Driver Assistance Systems for Transport System Efficiency: Influencing Factors on User Acceptance. Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 3 (2013), 245-254.
15. Joshi, S., Bellet, T., Bodard, V., and Amditis, A. Perceptions of Risk and Control: Understanding Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. In Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2009. Springer, 2009, 524-527.
16. Lee, J., and Moray, N. Trust, Control Strategies and Allocation of Function in Human-Machine Systems. Ergonomics 35, 10 (1992), 1243-1270.
17. McKnight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., and Clay, P. F. Trust in a Specific Technology: An Investigation of its Components and Measures. ACM Trans. on Management Information Systems 2, 2 (2011), 12.
18. Meschtscherjakov, A., Wilfinger, D., Scherndl, T., and Tscheligi, M. Acceptance of Future Persuasive In-Car Interfaces Towards a More Economic Driving Behaviour. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on AUI'09 (2009), 81-88.
19. NHTSA. Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicle, May 2013. http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated-Vehicles-Policy.pdf.
20. Nilsson, L. Safety Effects of Adaptive Cruise Controls in Critical Traffic Situations. In Proc. World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems (1995), 1254-1259.
21. Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., and Tscheligi, M. Predicting Information Technology Usage in the Car: Towards a Car Technology Acceptance Model. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on AUI'12 (2012), 51-58.
22. Piao, J., McDonald, M., Henry, A., Vaa, T., and Tveit, O. An Assessment of User Acceptance of Intelligent Speed Adaptation Systems. In Proc. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2005), 1045-1049.
23. Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C., Klein, M., Beierlein, C., and Kovaleva, A. Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der fünf Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit: Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Tech. rep., GESIS, 2012.
24. Schaller, T., Schielen, J., and Gradenegger, B. Stauassistenz-Unterstützung des Fahrers in der Quer-und Längsführung: Systementwicklung und Kundenakzeptanz. In Aktive Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz (Garching, 2008).
25. Terry, D. J., and O'Leary, J. E. The Theory of Planned Behaviour: The Effects of Perceived Behavioural Control and Self-Efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology 34, 2 (1995), 199-220.
26. Tscheligi, M., Wilfinger, D., Meschtscherjakov, A., Montesinos, C., McCall, R., Szostak, D., Muir, A., and Ratan, R. Exploring the User Experience of Autonomous Driving. In Workshop at 5th Int. Conf. on AUI'13 (2013).