Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 463-488

  Lewis, James R ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; USER INTERFACES;

PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATIONS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0036042675     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc143&4_11     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
2. Barnette, J. J. (2000). Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 361-370.
3. Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 143-156.
4. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189-194). London: Taylor & Francis.
5. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 187-212.
6. Chin, J. P, Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 213-218). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
7. Clarke, I. (2001). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research. International Marketing Review, 18, 301-324.
8. Cliff, N. (1993). Analyzing multivariate data. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
9. Cliff, N. (1996). Ordinal methods for behavioral data analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Coovert, M. D., & McNelis, K. (1988). Determining the number of common factors in factor analysis: A review and program. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 687-693.
11. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Grimm, S. D., & Church, A. T. (1999). A cross-cultural study of response biases in personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 415-441.
13. Harris, R. J. (1985). A primer of multivariate statistics. Orlando, FL: Academic.
14. Hollemans, G. (1999). User satisfaction measurement methodologies: Extending the user satisfaction questionnaire. In Proceedings of HCI International '99 8th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1008-1012). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Ibrahim, A. M. (2001). Differential responding to positive and negative items: The case of a negative item in a questionnaire for course and faculty evaluation. Psychological Reports, 88, 497-500.
16. Kirakowski, J., & Corbett, M. (1993). SUMI: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 210-212.
17. Kirakowski, J., & Dillon, A. (1988). The computer user satisfaction inventory (CUSI): Manual and scoring key. Cork, Ireland: Human Factors Research Group, University College of Cork.
18. LaLomia, M. J., & Sidowski, J. B. (1990). Measurements of computer satisfaction, literacy, and aptitudes: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 231-253.
19. Landauer, T. K. (1988). Research methods in human-computer interaction. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 905-928). New York: Elsevier.
20. Lewis, J. R. (1991). User satisfaction questionnaires for usability studies: 1991 manual of directions for the ASQ and PSSUQ (Tech. Rep. No. 54.609). Boca Raton, FL: International Business Machines Corporation.
21. Lewis, J. R. (1992a). Psychometric evaluation of the computer system usability questionnaire: The CSUQ (Tech. Rep. No. 54.723). Boca Raton, FL: International Business Machines Corporation.
22. Lewis, J. R. (1992b). Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: The PSSUQ. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1259-1263). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
23. Lewis, J. R. (1993). Multipoint scales: Mean and median differences and observed significance levels. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 383-392.
24. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 57-78.
25. Lewis, J. R. (1996). Reaping the benefits of modern usability evaluation: The Simon story. In G. Salvendy & A. Ozok (Eds.), Advances in applied ergonomics: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Applied Ergonomics - ICAE '96 (pp. 752-757). Istanbul, Turkey: USA Publishing.
26. Lewis, J. R. (1997). A general plan for conducting human factors studies of competitive speech dictation accuracy and throughput (Tech. Rep. No. 29.2246). Raleigh, NC: IBM Corp.
27. Lewis, J. R. (1999a). Streamlining a general test plan for competitive evaluation of dictation accuracy and throughput (Tech. Rep. No. 29.3158). Raleigh, NC: IBM Corp.
28. Lewis, J. R. (1999b). Tradeoffs in the design of the IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires. In Proceedings of HCI International '99 of the 8th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1023-1027). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Lewis, J. R., Henry, S. C., & Mack, R. L. (1990). Integrated office software benchmarks: A case study. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT '90 (pp. 337-343). Cambridge, England: Elsevier.
30. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69, 1007-1031.
32. Zickar, M. J. (1998). Modeling item-level data with item response theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 104-109.