Comparing the user experience of touchscreen technologies in an automotive application

AutomotiveUI 2014 - 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, in Cooperation with ACM SIGCHI - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Pitts, Matthew J ^a   Skrypchuk, Lee ^b   Attridge, Alex ^a   Williams, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b JAGUAR LAND ROVER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automotive; HMI; Touchscreen

Indexed keywords

TOUCH SCREENS; USER INTERFACES;

AUTOMOTIVE; AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS; INITIAL TREATMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCHSCREEN INTERFACES; USABILITY MEASURES; USER-CENTRED;

USER EXPERIENCE;

EID: 85116180425     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2667317.2667418     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. ABI Research. 2011. 97% of All Smartphones Will Have Touchscreens by 2016 (26th August 2011).Retrieved 4th May, 2014 from https://www.abiresearch.com/press/97-of-allsmartphones-will-have-touchscreens-by-20
2. IDC. 2014. Worldwide Smartphone Shipments Top One Billion Units for the First Time, According to IDC (27th Jan 2014 ). Retrieved 4th May, 2014 from http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24645 514
3. Sears, A., Plaisant, C. and Shneiderman, B. A New Era for High Precision Touchscreens. In H.R. Hartson and D. Hix (Ed.). Advances in Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 3. Ablex Publishing, New Jersey, 1992.
4. Wu, F.-G., Lin, H. and You, M. Direct-touch vs. Mouse input for navigation modes of the web map. Displays, 32, 5 (2011), 261-267.
5. Volvo Cars. 2014. Volvo Car Group unveils Concept Estate at Geneva Motor Show. (27th Feb 2014). Retrieved 4th May, 2014 from https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/engb/media/pressreleases/139220/volvo-car-groupunveils-concept-estate-at-geneva-motor-show
6. Phares, R. and Fihn, M. Introduction to Touchscreen Technologies. In J. Chen, W. Cranton and M. Fihn (Ed.). Handbook of Visual Display Technology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
7. IHS Technology. 2013. Voice Recognition Installed in More than Half of New Cars by 2019. (19th March 2013). Retrieved 4th May 2014, 2014 from https://technology.ihs.com/427146/voice-recognitioninstalled-in-more-than-half-of-new-cars-by-2019
8. Zwahlen, H. T., Adams, C. and DeBald, D. Safety Aspects of CRT Touch Panel Controls in Automobiles. In A. G. Gale, M. H. Freeman, C. M. Haslegrave, P. Smith and S. P. Taylor (Ed.). Vision in Vehicles II. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
9. Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D. and Green, P. Destination Entry while Driving: Speech Recognition versus a Touch-Screen Keyboard. UMTRI-2001-24, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), Human Factors Division, 2002.
10. Bach, K. M., Jæger, M. G., Skov, M. B. and Thomassen, N. G. You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press (2008), 1139-1148.
11. Christiansen, L. H., Frederiksen, N. Y., Jensen, B. S., Ranch, A., Skov, M. B. and Thiruravichandran, N. Don't Look at Me, I'm Talking to You: Investigating Input and Output Modalities for In-Vehicle Systems. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2011 (2011), 675-691.
12. Fuller, H., Tsimhoni, O. and Reed, M. P. Effect of In-Vehicle Touch Screen Position on Driver Performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52, 23 (2008), 1893-1897.
13. Fuller, H. and Tsimhoni, O. Glance Strategies for Using an In-Vehicle Touch-Screen Monitor. UMTRI-2009-5, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI)-Human Factors Division, 2009.
14. Burnett, G. E., Large, D., Crundall, E., Lawson, G., De-Kremer, S. and Skrypchuk, L. A comparison of resistive and capacitive touchscreens for use within vehicles. Advances in Transportation Studies, Section A 31 (2013).
15. Stone, H. and Sidel, J. L. Sensory evaluation practices. Elsevier Academic Press, California, 2004.
16. Byers, J. C., Bittner, A. C. and Hill, S. G. Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary? Advances in Indusrial Erogonomics and Safety (1989), 481-485.
17. Brooke, J. SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. A. Thomas, B. Weerdmeester and I. L. McClelland (Ed.). Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, London, 1996.
18. Brooke, J. SUS: A Retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8, 2 (2013), 29-40.
19. Abdi, H. The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons. In N. Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA), 2007.
20. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T. and Miller, J. T. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 6 (2008), 574-594.
21. Lee, S. and Zhai, S. The Performance of Touchscreen Soft Buttons. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference (CHI 09), ACM Press (2009).
22. CQM. A special issue on Kano's Methods for Understanding Customer-defined Quality. Centre for Quality Management Journal, 2, 4 (1993), 3-36.
23. Consumer Reports. 2012. Consumer Reports Auto Reliability Survey: Ford Continues Fall While Seven Japanese Brands Top List. (29th October 2012).Retrieved 20th May, 2013 from http://pressroom.consumerreports.org/pressroom/2012/10/consumer-reports-auto-reliability-survey-fordcontinues-fall-while-seven-japanese-brands-top-list.html
24. Jensen, C. 2011. 'Aggravating' MyFord Touch Sends Ford Plummeting in J.D. Power Quality Survey. (23rd June 2011). Retrieved 25th June 2012, from http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/aggravating-myford-touch-sends-ford-plummeting-in-j-d-powerquality-survey/