Anthropomorphic agents, transparent automation and driver personality: Towards an integrative multilevel model of determinants for effective driver-vehicle cooperation in highly automated vehicles

Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive VehicularApplications, AutomotiveUI 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 8-13

  Kraus, Johannes Maria ^a   Sturn, Jessica ^a   Reiser, Julian Elias ^a   Baumann, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Driver personality; Driver vehicle cooperation; Transparency; Trust; Trust in automation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRANSPARENCY; USER INTERFACES; VEHICLES;

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVER PERSONALITY; DRIVER-VEHICLE COOPERATION; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTEGRATING RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESS; TRUST;

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84960085278     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2809730.2809738     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2:179-211.
2. Etwart de Visser, Frank Krueger, Patrick McKnight, Steven Scheid, Melissa Smith, Stephanie Chalk, Raja Parasuraman. 2012. The World is not Enough: Trust in Cognitive Agents. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56:263-267.
3. John Lee and Neville Moray. 1994. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaption to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 1:153-184.
4. John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46, 1:50-80.
5. Brian Y. Lim, Anind K. Dey, Daniel Avrahami. 2009. Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), 2119-2128.
6. Poornima Madhavan and Douglas A. Wiegmann. 2007. Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: an integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8, 4:277-301.
7. Gloria Mark and Alfred Kobsa. 2005. The effects of collaboration and system transparency on CIVE usage: An empirical study and model. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14, 1:60-80.
8. Roger C. Mayer, James H. Davis, F. David Schoorman. 1995. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review 20, 3:709-734.
9. Rachel McDonnell, Martin Breidt, Heinrich Bülthoff. 2012. Render me real? Investigating the effect of render style on the perception of animated virtual humans. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 4, 91.
10. Bonnie M. Muir and Neville Moray. 1996. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics 39, 3:429-460.
11. Donald A. Norman. 2014. Some observations on mental models. In Mental models, Dedre Gentner and Albert L. Stevens (Eds.). Psychology Press, New York, US, 7-14.
12. Thomas B. Sheridan. 2002. Humans and automation: System design and research issues. John Wiley & Sons, New York, US.
13. Neville A. Stanton and Mark S. Young. 2000. A proposed psychological model of driving automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 1, 4:315-331.
14. Adam Waytz, Joy Heafner, Nicholas Epley. 2014. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52, 113-117.