Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology acceptance model

AutomotiveUI 2012 - 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, In-cooperation with ACM SIGCHI - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 51-58

  Osswald, Sebastian ^a   Wurhofer, Daniela ^a   Trösterer, Sandra ^a   Beck, Elke ^a   Tscheligi, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Automotive user interfaces; Context; Ctam; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR PREDICTION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTEXT; CTAM; DECISION PROCESS; IN-CAR TECHNOLOGY; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATIONS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MODELING APPROACH; MODELING PROCESS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; USER INTERFACES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84870573293     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2390256.2390264     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. D. Adams, R. Nelson, and P. Todd. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS quarterly, pages 227-247, 1992.
2. C. Alm and E. Lindberg. Perceived Risk, Feelings of Safety and Worry Associated with Different Travel Modes: Pilot Study. KFB, 2000.
3. R. Bagozzi. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4):244-254, 2007.
4. A. Bandura. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice. Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
5. R. Bañuls Egeda, E. Carbonell Vaya, M. Casanoves, and M. Chisvert. Different emotional responses in novice and professional drivers. In T. Rothengatter and E. C. Vaya, editors, Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application. Pergamon, 1996.
6. F. Davis and V. Venkatesh. Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. Engineering Management, IEEE, 51(1):31 - 46, 2004.
7. F. D. Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3):318+, 1989.
8. F. Eyben, M. Wöllmer, T. Poitschke, B. Schuller, C. Blaschke, B. Färber, and N. Nguyen-Thien. Emotion on the road: necessity, acceptance, and feasibility of affective computing in the car. Adv. in Hum.-Comp. Int., 2010:5:1-5:17, Jan. 2010.
9. F. Ford and L. Alverson-Eiland. The relationship between anxiety and task performance and skill acquisition in the motorcycle safety foundation's motorcycle rider course. In IMC'91, pages 363-379, Bochum, 1991.
10. J. Groeger. Mood and driving: Is there an effect of affect? In Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application. Pergamon, 1997.
11. S. Joshi, T. Bellet, V. Bodard, and A. Amditis. Perceptions of risk and control: Understanding acceptance of advanced driver assistance systems. INTERACT'09, pages 524-527, 2009.
12. B. Kantowitz, R. Hanowski, and S. Kantowitz. Driver acceptance of unreliable traffic information in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2):164-176, 1997.
13. G. Lowry. Translation and validation of the technology acceptance model and instrument for use in the arab world. In ACIS 2004, 2004.
14. A. Meschtscherjakov, D. Wilfinger, N. Gridling, K. Neureiter, and M. Tscheligi. Capture the car! qualitative in-situ methods to grasp the automotive context. In AUI'11. ACM, 2011.
15. A. Meschtscherjakov, D. Wilfinger, T. Scherndl, and M. Tscheligi. Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour. In AUI'09, pages 81-88. ACM, 2009.
16. J. Mesken. Measuring Emotions in Traffic. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, 2002.
17. C. Nass, I.-M. Jonsson, H. Harris, B. Reaves, J. Endo, S. Brave, and L. Takayama. Improving automotive safety by pairing driver emotion and car voice emotion. In CHI EA '05, pages 1973-1976, 2005.
18. A. Öhman. Fear and anxiety: Evolutionary, cognitive and clinical perspectives. In M. Lewis and J. Haviland-Jones, editors, Handbook of Emotions. Guilford Press, 2000.
19. S. Osswald, A. Meschtscherjakov, D. Wilfinger, and M. Tscheligi. Interacting with the steering wheel: Potential reductions in driver distraction. AMI'11, pages 11-20, 2011.
20. R. Parasuraman, T. Sheridan, and C. Wickens. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems and Humans, 30(3):286-297, 2000.
21. C. Sauer. Why information systems fail: a case study approach. Alfred Waller Ltd., Oxfordshire, UK, 1993.
22. C. Spielberger, R. Gorsuch, and L. Edward. STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory ("Self-evaluation questionnaire"). Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.
23. L. Takayama and C. Nass. Driver safety and information from afar: An experimental driving simulator study of wireless vs. in-car information services. Int. J. HCS, 66(3):173-184, Mar. 2008.
24. J. Van Der Laan, A. Heino, and D. De Waard. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research: Emerging Technologies, 5(1):1-10, 1997.
25. V. Venkatesh and H. Bala. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2):273-315, 2008.
26. V. Venkatesh and F. Davis. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, pages 186-204, 2000.
27. V. Venkatesh, F. Davis, and M. Morris. Dead or alive? the development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4):267-286, 2007.
28. V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, pages 425-478, 2003.
29. B. Wixom and P. Todd. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information systems research, 16(1):85-102, 2005.