How is acceptance measured? Overview of measurement issues, methods and tools

Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 73-88

  Adell, Emeli ^a   Nilsson, Lena ^b   Várhelyi, András ^c  

^a Trivector Traffic ^*  (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901073359     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Adell, E. 2009. Driver experience and acceptance of driver support systems - A case of speed support. Bulletin 251. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
2. Adell, E. and Várhelyi, A. 2008. Driver comprehension and acceptance of the active accelerator pedal after long-term use. Transportation Research Part F, 11(1): 37-51.
3. Adell, E., Várhelyi, A. and Hjälmdahl, M. 2008. Auditory and haptic systems for in-car speed management - A comparative real life study. Transportation Research Part F, 11(6): 445-58.
4. Broekx, S., Vlassenroot, S., de Mol, J., and Int Panis, L. 2006. The European PROSPER-project: Final results of the trial on Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) in Belgium. Proceedings of the 13 th World Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems, London.
5. Brook-Carter, N., Parkes, A., Ernst, A.C., Jaspers, I., Nilsson, L., Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., Damiani, S., Tango, F., Boverie, S., Danglemaier, M., Knoche, A., Yannis, G. and Golias, J. 2001. Development of multiparameter criteria and a common impact assessment methodology. Deliverable D4.1, EU project ADVISORS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), European Commission. TRL, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.
6. Brooke, J. 1996. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189-94. Edited by Jordan, P.W. et al. London: Taylor and Francis.
7. Brookhuis, K.A. 1993. Geïntegreerde informatiesystemen en taakbelasting (Integrated information systems and work load). Traffic Research Centre, University of Groningen: Haren. VK-93-10.
8. Brookhuis, K.A., Uneken, E. and Nilsson, L. 2001. ADVISORS Common Measures. Internal Deliverable RUG ID5_1_1, ADVISORS project, EC Programme Competitive and Sustainable Growth.
9. Carsten, O.M.J. and Fowkes, M. 1998. External vehicle speed control, Phase I results, Executive summary. Institute for Transportation Studies, University of Leeds, UK.
10. Carsten, O.M.J., Merat, N., Janssen, W.H., Johansson, E., Fowkes, M. and Brookhuis, K.A. 2005. HASTE final report. EU project HASTE (Human machine interaction And the Safety of Traffic in Europe), European Commission.
11. Chalmers, I.J. 2001. User attitudes to automated highway systems. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems International Conference (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 483), 6-10.
12. Cherri, C., Nodari, E. and Toffetti, A. 2004. Review of existing Tools and Methods. D2.1.1 AIDE, Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme.
13. Collins, D.J., Biever, W.J., Dingus, T.A. and Neale, V.L. 1999. Development of human factors guidelines for Advanced Traveler Information Systems (STIS) and Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO): An examination of driver performance under reduced visibility conditions when using an In-Vehicle Signing and Information System (ISIS). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Centre for Transportation Research, Blacksburg, USA; Federal Highway Administration, Report Number: FHWA-RD-99-130.
14. Comte, S., Wardman, M. and Whelan, G. 2000. Drivers' acceptance of automatic speed limiters: Implications for policy and implementation. Transport Policy, 7: 259-67.
15. Duivenvoorden, K. 2008. Roadside versus in-car speed support for a green wave: A driving simulator study. Master's thesis, TNO Defence, Security and Safety, Soesterberg, the Netherlands.
16. Ervin, R., Sayer, J., LeBlanc, D., Bogard, S., Mefford, M., Hagan, M., Bareket, Z. and Winkler, C. 2005. Automotive collision avoidance system field operational test report: Methodology and results. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, General Motors Corporation, Research and Development Centre, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 809 900.
17. euroFOT. 2012. Final results: User acceptance and user-related aspects Deliverable 6.3.
18. FESTA Consortium. 2008. FESTA Handbook, version 2. Deliverable 6.4, EU project FESTA (Field opErational teSt support Action), European Commission.
19. FOT-NET consortium. 2011. FESTA Handbook, version 4. EU project FOT-NET (Field Operational Tests Networking and Methodology Promotion), European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, Seventh Framework Programme.
20. GM and Delphi-Delco Electronic Systems. 2002. Automotive collision avoidance system field operational test: Warning cue implementation, summary report. US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 809 462.
21. Jamson, S. 2010. Acceptability data - What should or could it predict? International seminar on acceptance, Paris, 25 November.
22. Kircher, K., Gelau, C., Vierkötter, M., Rakic, M., Bärgman, J., Kotiranta, R., Victor, T., Regan, M., Saad, F., Engel, R., Page, Y., Rognin, L., Brouwer, R., Feenstra, P., Hogema, J., Malone, K., Minett, C., Schrijver, J., Barnard, Y., Jamson, H., Jamson, S., Hammarström, U., Hjälmdahl, M., Kircher, A., Tapani, A., Luoma, J., Peltola, H. and Rämä, P. 2008. Comprehensive framework of performance indicators and their interaction. Deliverable 2.1, EU project FESTA (Field opErational teSt supporT Action), European Commission.
23. Kuiken, M. and Groeger, J. 1993. Effects of feedback on driving performance at crossroads and on curves. Traffic Research Centre, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
24. Marchau, V., van der Heijden, R. and Molin, E. 2005. Desirability of advanced driver assistance from road safety perspective: The case of ISA. Safety Science, 43(1): 11-27.
25. Marell, A. and Westin. K. 1998. Bilisters inställning till dynamisk hastighetsanpassning - ett försök med hastighesvarnare i Umeå. TRUM-report 1998:01, Umeå University, Sweden (in Swedish).
26. Matsuzawa, M., Kaneko, M. and Kajiya, Y. 2001. User acceptability of the safe- driving support system for winter roads. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Sydney, Australia.
27. Menzel, C. 2004. Basic conditions for the implementation of speed adaptation technologies in Germany. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Germany.
28. Molin, E. and Brookhuis, K. 2007. Modelling acceptability of the intelligent speed adapter. Transportation Research Part F, 10(2): 99-108.
29. Najm, W.G., Stearns, M.D., Howarth, H., Koopmann, J. and Hitz, J. 2006. Evaluation of an automotive rear-end collision avoidance system (Chapter 5). US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 810 569, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe National Transportation Systems Centre, Cambridge, MA, USA.
30. Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Nilsson, L., Alm, H. and Janssen, W. 1992. Collision Avoidance Systems - Effects of different levels of task allocation on driver behaviour. Reprint from DRIVE Project V1041 (GIDS), September 1991, VTI Reprint No. 182, VTI (The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute), Sweden.
32. Nilsson, L. and Nåbo, A. 1996. Evaluation of application 3: Intelligent cruise control simulator experiment, effects on different levels of automation on driver behaviour, workload and attitudes. Reprint of Chapter 5 in Evaluation of Results, Deliverable No. 10, DRIVE II Project V2006 (EMMIS).
33. Nilsson, L., Törnros, J., Parkes, A., Brook-Carter, N., Dangelmaier, M., Brookhuis, K., Roskam, A-J., De Waard, D., Bauer, A., Gelau, C., Tango, F., Damiani, S., Jaspers, I., Ernst, A. and Wiethoff, M. 2003. An integrated methodology and pilot evaluation results. Deliverable D4/5.2 part III, EU project ADVISORS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), European Commission. VTI, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden.
34. Parker, D., McDonald, L., Rabbitt, P. and Sutcliffe, P. 2003. Older drivers and road safety: The acceptability of a range of intervention measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(5): 805-10.
35. Philipps, P. and Schmitz, P. 2001. From information/service platforms to services in the transport and tourism sector - The European capitals approach. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Sydney, Australia.
36. Piao, J., McDonald, M., Henry, A., Vaa, T. and Tveit, O. 2005. An assessment of user acceptance of intelligent speed adaptation systems. Proceeding of the IEEE conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vienna, Austria: 1045-9.
37. Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
38. Stanley, L.M. 2006. Haptic and auditory interfaces as a collision avoidance technique during roadway departures and driver perception of these modalities. PhD thesis, publication number 3207055, Montana State University, US.
39. Stradling, S., Meadows, M. and Beatty, S. 2004. Attitudes to telemetric driving constraints. In Traffic and Transport Psychology, Theory and Application, Proceedings of the ICTTP, 333-8. Edited by Rothengatter, T. and Huguenin, R.D. London: Elsevier.
40. SWOV. 2003. Action for advanced driver assistance and vehicle control systems implementation, standardization, optimum use of the road network and safety. EU project ADVISORS (European Community, GRD1 2000 10047). Final publishable report. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, the Netherlands.
41. Törnros, T., Nilsson, L., Östlund, J. and Kircher, A. 2002. Effects of ACC on driver behaviour, workload and acceptance in relation to minimum time headway. Ninth World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Chicago, 14-17 October.
42. Turrentine, T., Sperling, D. and Hungerford, D. 1991. Consumer acceptance of adaptive cruise control and collision avoidance systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1318: 118-21.
43. Van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A. and De Waard, D. 1997. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telemetics. Transportation Research Part C, 5(1): 1-10.
44. Van Driel, C. 2007. Driver support in congestion - An assessment of user needs and impacts on driver and traffic flow. PhD thesis, TRAIL Thesis Series, T2007/10. Netherlands: TRAIL Research School.
45. Van Winsum, W., Martens, M. and Herland, L. 1999. The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behaviour and user acceptance. TM-99-C043, TNO Human Factors, the Netherlands.
46. Várhelyi, A., Comte, S. and Mäkinen, T. 1998. Evaluation of in-car speed limiters: Final report. Deliverable D11, MASTER-project.
47. Vlassenroot, S., Broekx, S., de Mol, J., Int Panis, L., Brijs, T. and Wets, G. 2007. Driving with intelligent speed adaptation: Final results of the Belgian ISA- trial. Transportation Research Part A, 41(3): 267-79.
48. Young, K.L., Regan, M.A., Triggs, T.J., Tomasevic, N., Stephan, K. and Mitsopoulos, E. 2007. Impact on car driving performance of a following distance warning system: Findings from the Australian Transport Accident Commission Safe Car Project. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Technology, Planning and Operations, 11(3): 121-31.