Use cases for assessing, testing, and validating the human machine interface of automated driving systems

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2018, Pages 1873-1877

  Naujoks, Frederik ^a   Hergeth, Sebastian ^a   Wiedemann, Katharina ^b   Schömig, Nadja ^b  

^a BMW GROUP   (Germany)

^b WIVW GmbH Andreas Keinath BMW Group   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; TAXONOMIES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; AUTOMATION LEVELS; COMBINATORICS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS; NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATIONS; SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85055976745     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Feldhütter, A., Segler, C, & Bengler, K. (2017, July). Does Shifting Between Conditionally and Partially Automated Driving Lead to a Loss of Mode Awareness? In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 730-741). Springer, Cham.
2. Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., & Neukum, A. (2016, October). Your Turn or My Turn?: Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 253-260). ACM, New York.
3. Gold, C, Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bellem, H., & Jarosch, O. (2017, July). Testing Scenarios for Human Factors Research in Level 3 Automated Vehicles. In International Conference on Applied Hitman Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 551-559). Springer, Cham.
4. Lu, Z., Happee, R., Cabrall, C. D., Kyriakidis, M., & De Winter, J. C. (2016). Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 43, 183-198.
5. McCall, R., McGee, F., Meschtscherjakov, A., Louveton, N., & Engel, T. (2016, October). Towards a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 193-200). ACM, New York.
6. Naujoks, F., Forster, Y., Wiedemann, K., & Neukum, A. (2017). A human-machine interface for cooperative highly automated driving. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (pp. 585-595). Springer, Cham.
7. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2016). Federal automated vehicles policy: Accelerating the next revolution in roadway safety. US Department of Transportation, Washington.
8. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2017). Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety. US Department of Transportation, Washington.
9. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
10. SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. (2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International, Warrandale, USA.
11. Wintersberger, P., Green, P., & Riener, A. (2017). Am I Driving or Are You or Are We Both? A Taxonomy for Handover and Handback in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 330-339). The University of Iowa, Iowa.