Looking beyond Saccharomyces: The potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Radecka, Dorota ^a,b   Mukherjee, Vaskar ^a,b   Mateo, Raquel Quintilla ^a,b   Stojiljkovic, Marija ^a,b   Foulquié Moreno, María R ^a,b   Thevelein, Johan M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Non Saccharomyces; Phenotype; Stress tolerance; Yeasts

Indexed keywords

BIOETHANOL; ALCOHOL; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

CONTROLLED STUDY; DEKKERA; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; HEAT TOLERANCE; KLUYVEROMYCES MARXIANUS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PICHIA KUDRIAVZEVII; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SHORT SURVEY; STRESS; ZYGOSACCHAROMYCES ROUXII; BIOREACTOR; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; YEAST;

ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; BIOREACTORS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; YEASTS;

EID: 84949202418     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fov053     Document Type: Short Survey

References (168)

1. Abdel-Banat BMA, Hoshida H, Ano A, et al. High-temperature fermentation: how can processes for ethanol production at high temperatures become superior to the traditional process using mesophilic yeast? Appl Microbiol Biot 2010;85: 861-7.
2. Aguilar-Uscanga MG, Garcia-Alvarado Y, Gomez-Rodriguez J, et al. Modelling the growth and ethanol production of Brettanomyces bruxellensis at different glucose concentrations. Lett Appl Microbiol 2011;53:141-9. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21575020 (11 November 2014, date last accessed).
3. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, et al. GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol Cell Biol 1994;14:4135-44.
4. Almeida RM, Modig T, Petersson A. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biot 2007;82: 340-9.
5. Anderson PJ, Mcneil K, Watson K. High-efficiency carbohydrate fermentation to high-efficiency carbohydrate fermentation to ethanol at temperatures above 40°C by Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus isolated from Sugar Mills. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986;51:1314-20.
6. Arneborg N, Jespersen L, Jakobsen M. Individual cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces exhibit different short-term intracellular pH responses to acetic acid. Arch Microbiol 2000;174:125-8. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s002030000185 (26 June 2015, date last accessed).
7. Avila J, Pérez MD, Brito N, et al. Cloning and disruption of the YNR1 gene encoding the nitrate reductase apoenzyme of the yeast Hansenula polymorpha. FEBS Lett 1995;366:137-42.
8. Banat IM, Nigam P, Marchant R. Isolation of thermotolerant, fermentative yeasts growing at 52°C and producing ethanol at 45°C and 50°C. World J Microb Biot 1992;8:259-63.
9. Basso LC, Basso TO, Rocha SN. Ethanol Production in Brazil: The Industrial Process and Its Impact on Yeast Fermentation. In: dos Santos BernardesMA (ed). Biofuel production-recent developments and prospects. InTech 2011, 1530, DOI: 10.5772/17047.
10. Belloch C, Barrio E, García MD, et al. Inter- and intraspecific chromosome pattern variation in the yeast genus Kluyveromyces. Yeast 1998;14:1341-54.
11. Boekhout T. Gut feeling for yeasts. Nature 2005;434:449-51.
12. Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, et al. Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:E139-48. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3890796&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (28 April 2014, date last accessed).
13. Borneman AR, Zeppel R, Chambers PJ, et al. Insights into the Dekkera bruxellensis genomic landscape: comparative genomics reveals variations in ploidy and nutrient utilisation potential amongst wine isolates. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004161. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3923673&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (5 November 2014, date last accessed).
14. Botstein D, Chervitz SA, Cherry JM. Yeast as a model organism. Science 1997;277:1259-60.
15. Brandam C, Castro-Martínez C, Délia ML, et al. Effect of temperature on Brettanomyces bruxellensis: metabolic and kinetic aspects. Can J Microbiol 2008;54:11-8.
16. Branduardi P, Dato L, Porro D. Molecular tools and protocols for engineering the acid-tolerant yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii as a potential cell factory. Method Mol Biol 2014;1152:63-85.
17. Branduardi P, Valli M, Brambilla L, et al. The yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii: a new host for heterologous protein production, secretion and for metabolic engineering applications. FEMS Yeast Res 2004;4:493-504.
18. Brett CL, Tukaye DN, Mukherjee S, et al. The yeast endosomal Na+(K+)/H+ exchanger Nhx1 regulates cellular pH to control vesicle trafficking. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16: 1396-405.
19. Cantarella M, Cantarella L, Gallifuoco A, et al. Effect of inhibitors released during steam-explosion treatment of poplar wood on subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and SSF. Biotechnol Prog 2004;20:200-6.
20. Cassio F, Leao C, van Uden N. Transport of lactate and other short-chain monocarboxylates in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microb 1987;53:509-13.
21. Chan GF, Gan HM, Ling HL, et al. Genome sequence of Pichia kudriavzevii M12, a potential producer of bioethanol and phytase. Eukaryot Cell 2012;11:1300-1. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3485917&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
22. Chandel AK, Kapoor RK, Singh A, et al. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501. Bioresource Technol 2007;98: 1947-50.
23. Crauwels S, Zhu B, Steensels J, et al. Assessing genetic diversity among Brettanomyces yeasts by DNA fingerprinting and whole-genome sequencing. Appl Environ Microb 2014;80:4398-413. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24814796 (5 November 2014, date last accessed).
24. Curtin CD, Borneman AR, Chambers PJ, et al. Denovo assembly and analysis of the heterozygous triploid genome of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis AWRI1499. PLoS One 2012;7:e33840. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3314683&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (11 November 2014, date last accessed).
25. Dandi ND, Dandi BN, Chaudhari AB. Bioprospecting of thermoand osmo-tolerant fungi from mango pulp-peel compost for bioethanol production. Anton Leeuw 2013;103:723-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180376 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
26. Daniel H-M, Vrancken G, Takrama JF, et al. Yeast diversity of Ghanaian cocoa bean heap fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 2009;9:774-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473277 (14 October 2014, date last accessed).
27. Dashko S, Zhou N, Compagno C, et al. Why, when, and how did yeast evolve alcoholic fermentation? FEMS Yeast Res 2014;14:826-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24824836 (25 October 2014, date last accessed).
28. Dato L, Branduardi P, Passolunghi S, et al. Advances in molecular tools for the use of Zygosaccharomyces bailii as host for biotechnological productions and construction of the first auxotrophic mutant. FEMS Yeast Res 2010;10: 894-908.
29. Davis D. Osmotic pressure of fungal compatible osmolytes. Mycol Res 2000;104:800-4.
30. De Barros Pita W, Leite FCB, de Souza Liberal AT, et al. The ability to use nitrate confers advantage to Dekkera bruxellensis over S. cerevisiae and can explain its adaptation to industrial fermentation processes. Anton Leeuw 2011;100:99-107. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350883 (10 March 2015, date last accessed).
31. De Souza Liberal AT, Basílio ACM, do Monte Resende A, et al. Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J Appl Microbiol 2007;102:538-47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17241360 (9 November 2014, date last accessed).
32. Dhaliwal SS, Oberoi HS, Sandhu SK, et al. Enhanced ethanol production from sugarcane juice by galactose adaptation of a newly isolated thermotolerant strain of Pichia kudriavzevii. Bioresource Technol 2011;102:5968-75. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21398115 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
33. Ding J, Huang X, Zhang L, et al. Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biot 2009;85:253-63. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19756577 (22 August 2013, date last accessed).
34. Dujon B. Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:512-24.
35. Echeverrigaray S, Randon M, daSilva K, et al. Identification and characterization of non-saccharomyces spoilage yeasts isolated from Brazilian wines. World J Microb Biot 2013;29: 1019-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23355138 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
36. Erasmus D, Vandermerwe G, Vanvuuren H. Genome-wide expression analyses: metabolic adaptation to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Res 2003;3:375-99.
37. Fuson GB, Presley HL, PhaffHJ. Deoxyribonucleic acid base sequence relatedness among members of the yeast genus Kluyveromyces. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987:37:371-9.
38. Galafassi S, Merico A, Pizza F, et al. Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts for ethanol production from renewable sources under oxygen-limited and low-pH conditions. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2011;38:1079-88. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20936422 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
39. Galeote V, Bigey F, Devillers H, et al. Genome sequence of the food spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii CLIB 213T. Genome Announc 2013;1:e00606-13.
40. Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AAA. Three genes whose expression is induced by stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1999;15:879-92.
41. Gaxiola R, Corona M, Zinker S. A halotolerant mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1996;178:2978-81.
42. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, et al. Life with 6000 Genes. Science (80-) 1996;274:546-67.
43. Guerra E, Chye PP, Berardi E, et al. Hypoxia abolishes transience of the heat-shock response in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Microbiology 2005;151: 805-11.
44. Hamada T, Sugishita M, Fukushima Y, et al. Continuous production of soy sauce by a bioreactor system. Process Biochem 1991;26:39-45.
45. Hanson SJ, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. Mating-type switching by chromosomal inversion in methylotrophic yeasts suggests an origin for the three-locus Saccharomyces cerevisiae system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:E4851-8.
46. Hartner FS, Glieder A. Regulation of methanol utilisation pathway genes in yeasts. Microb Cell Fact 2006;5:39.
47. Hellborg L, Piskur J. Complex nature of the genome in a wine spoilage yeast, Dekkera bruxellensis. Eukaryot Cell 2009;8: 1739-49. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=2772400&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (5 March 2015, date last accessed).
48. Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol R 2002;66:300-72.
49. Hoshida H, Murakami N, Suzuki A, et al. Non-homologous end joining-mediated functional marker selection for DNA cloning in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Yeast 2014;31:29-46.
50. Hu N, Yuan B, Sun J, et al. Thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains representing potentials for bioethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke by consolidated bioprocessing. Appl Microbiol Biot 2012;95: 1359-68.
51. Ishchuk OP, Voronovsky AY, Abbas CA, et al. Construction of Hansenula polymorpha strains with improved thermotolerance. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;104:911-9.
52. Ishchuk OP, Voronovsky AY, Stasyk OV, et al. Overexpression of pyruvate decarboxylase in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha results in increased ethanol yield in high-temperature fermentation of xylose. FEMS Yeast Res 2008;8:1164-74.
53. Isono N, Hayakawa H, Usami A, et al. A comparative study of ethanol production by Issatchenkia orientalis strains under stress conditions. J Biosci Bioeng 2012;113:76-8. http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138917231100377X (20 February 2014, date last accessed).
54. Iwaki T, Higashida Y, Tsuji H, et al. Characterization of a second gene (ZSOD22) of Na+/H +antiporter from salt-tolerant yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii and functional expression of ZSOD2 and ZSOD22 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998;14: 1167-74.
55. James SA, Stratford M. Chapter 84-Zygosaccharomyces. In: Boekhout CPKWF (ed). The Yeasts, 5th edn. London: Elsevier, 2011, 937-47.
56. Janzowski C, Glaab V, Samimi E, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural: assessment of mutagenicity, DNA-damaging potential and reactivity towards cellular glutathione. 2000;38:801-9.
57. Jeong H, Lee D-H, Kim SH, et al. Genome sequence of the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus KCTC 17555. Eukaryot Cell 2012;11:1584-5.
58. Jing Q, Lü X. Kinetics of non-catalyzed decomposition of glucose in high-temperature liquid water. Chinese J Chem Eng 2008;16:890-4.
59. Kegel A, Martinez P, Carter SD, et al. Genome wide distribution of illegitimate recombination events in Kluyveromyces lactis. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:1633-45.
60. Kim HR, Kim J, Bai D, et al. Microbiological characteristics of wild yeast strain Pichia anomala Y197-13 for brewing Makgeolli. Mycobiology 2013;41:139-44.
61. Kinclová O, Potier S, Sychrová H. The Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strain CBS732 contains only one copy of the HOG1 and the SOD2 genes. J Biotechnol 2001;88:151-8.
62. Kitagawa T, Tokuhiro K. Construction of a ß-glucosidase expression system using the multistress-tolerant yeast Issatchenkia orientalis. Appl Microbiol Biot 2010;87:1841-53.
63. Kourkoutas Y, Dimitropoulou S, Kanellaki M, et al. Hightemperature alcoholic fermentation of whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 yeast immobilized on deligni™ ed cellulosic material. Bioresource Technol 2002;82: 177-81.
64. Kubaczka M, Ge L De. Combined effects of pH and sugar on growth rate of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, a bakery product spoilage yeast. Society 1999;65:4921-5.
65. Kurtzman CP. A newmethanol assimilating yeast, Ogataea parapolymorpha, the ascosporic state of Candida parapolymorpha. Anton Leeuw 2011;100:455-62.
66. Kurylenko OO, Ruchala J, Hryniv OB, et al. Metabolic engineering and classical selection of the methylotrophic thermotolerant yeast Hansenula polymorpha for improvement of high-temperature xylose alcoholic fermentation. Microb Cell Fact 2014;13:122.
67. Kusumegi K, Yoshida H, Tomiyama S. Inhibitory effects of acetic acid on respiration and growth of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. J Ferment Bioeng 1998;85:213-7.
68. Kwon Y-J, Ma A-Z, Li Q, et al. Effect of lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds on growth and ethanol fermentation of newly-isolated thermotolerant Issatchenkia orientalis. Bioresource Technol 2011;102:8099-104. http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096085241100839X (20 February 2014, date last accessed).
69. Lambert RJ, Stratford M. Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response. J Appl Microbiol 1999;86: 157-64.
70. Lane MM, Burke N, Karreman R, et al. Physiological and metabolic diversity in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Anton Leeuw 2011;100:507-19.
71. Leandro MJ, Sychrová H, Prista C, et al. The osmotolerant fructophilic yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii employs two plasmamembrane fructose uptake systems belonging to a new family of yeast sugar transporters. Microbiology 2011;157:601-8.
72. Lee K-S, Kim J-S, Heo P, et al. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters for heterologous gene expression in Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl Microbiol Biot 2013;97:2029-41.
73. Limtong S, Sringiew C, Yongmanitchai W. Production of fuel ethanol at high temperature from sugar cane juice by a newly isolated Kluyveromyces marxianus. Bioresource Technol 2007;98:3367-74.
74. Limtong S, Sumpradit T, Kitpreechavanich V, et al. Effect of acetic acid on growth and ethanol fermentation of xylose fermenting yeast and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Kasetsart J (Natural Sci) 2000;34:64-73.
75. Lin F-M, Qiao B, Yuan Y-J. Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl Environ Microb 2009;75:3765-76. http://aem.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/AEM.02594-08 (11 March 2015, date last accessed).
76. Lindberg L, Santos AXS, Riezman H, et al. Lipidomic profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii reveals critical changes in lipid composition in response to acetic acid stress. PLoS One 2013;8:e73936.
77. Llorente B. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 12. Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus. FEBS Lett 2000;487:71-5.
78. Mager WH, Varela JCS. Osmostress response of the yeast Saccharomyces. Mol Microbiol 1993;10:253-8.
79. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, Wells ML, et al. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnol Prog 2001;17:287-93.
80. Martini ANNV, Martini A, Vegetale B, et al. Taxonomic revision of the yeast genus Kluyveromyces by nuclear deox yribonucleic acid reassociation. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987;44: 380-5.
81. Martins DBG, de Souza CG, Simões DA, et al. The betagalactosidase activity in Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS6556 decreases by high concentrations of galactose. Curr Microbiol 2002;44:379-82.
82. Martorell P, Stratford M, Steels H, et al. Physiological characterization of spoilage strains of Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii isolated from high sugar environments. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;114:234-42.
83. Meersman E, Steensels J, Mathawan M, et al. Detailed analysis of the microbial population in Malaysian spontaneous cocoa pulp fermentations reveals a core and variable microbiota. PLoS One 2013;8:e81559. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3864809&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (6 May 2014, date last accessed).
84. Membré JM, Kubaczka M, Chéné C. Combined effects of pH and sugar on growth rate of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, a bakery product spoilage yeast. Appl Environ Microb 1999;65: 4921-5.
85. Merico A, Capitanio D, Vigentini I, et al. Aerobic sugar metabolism in the spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii. FEMS Yeast Res 2003;4:277-83.
86. Meroth CB, Hammes WP, Hertel C. Identification and population dynamics of Yeasts in sourdough fermentation processes by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl EnvironMicrob 2003;69:7453-61.
87. Miklenić M, Štafa A, Bajic A, et al. Genetic transformation of the yeast Dekkera/Brettanomyces bruxellensis with nonhomologous DNA. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;23:674-80.
88. Mira NP, Münsterkötter M, Dias-Valada F, et al. The genome sequence of the highly acetic acid-tolerant Zygosaccharomyces bailii-derived interspecies hybrid strain ISA1307, isolated from a sparkling wine plant. DNA Res 2014;21:299-313.
89. Mollapour M, Piper PW. Targeted gene deletion in Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Yeast 2001;18:173-86.
90. Mollapour M, Piper PW. Hog1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:6446-56.
91. Mukherjee V, Steensels J, Lievens B, et al. Phenotypic evaluation of natural and industrial Saccharomyces yeasts for different traits desirable in industrial bioethanol production. Appl Microbiol Biot 2014;98:9483-98. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25267160 (29 October 2014, date last accessed).
92. Nonklang S, Abdel-Banat BMA, Cha-aim K, et al. High-temperature ethanol fermentation and transformation with linear DNA in the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus DMKU3-1042. Appl Environ Microb 2008;74:7514-21. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 2607150&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (10 September 2013, date last accessed).
93. Oberoi HS, Babbar N, Sandhu SK, et al. Ethanol production from alkali-treated rice straw via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii HOP-1. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2012;39:557-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22131104 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
94. Ogata K, Nishikawa H, Ohsugi M. A yeast capable of utilizing methanol. Agric Biol Chem 1969;33:1519-20.
95. Olofsson K, Bertilsson M, Lidén G. A short review on SSF-an interesting process option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Biotechnol Biofuels 2008;1:7.
96. Osorio-Cadavid E, Chaves-López C, Tofalo R, et al. Detection and identification of wild yeasts in Champús, a fermented Colombian maize beverage. Food Microbiol 2008;25:771-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18620968 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
97. Pais TM, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Hubmann G, et al. Comparative polygenic analysis of maximal ethanol accumulation capacity and tolerance to high ethanol levels of cell proliferation in yeast. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003548. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3675000&tool = pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (22 August 2013, date last accessed).
98. Paixão SM, Teixeira PD, Silva TP, et al. Screening of novel yeast inulinases and further application to bioprocesses. NewBiotechnol 2013;30:598-606.
99. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technol 2000;74:25-33.
100. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. Activity of glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1990;34:375-80.
101. Pando Bedriñana R, Querol Simón A, Suárez Valles B. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of autochthonous cider yeasts in a cellar from Asturias. Food Microbiol 2010;27:503-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20417399 (6 May 2014, date last accessed).
102. Papouskova K, Sychrova H. Yarrowia lipolytica possesses two plasma membrane alkali metal cation/H +antiporters with different functions in cell physiology. FEBS Lett 2006;580:1971-6.
103. Passoth V, Blomqvist J, Schnürer J. Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanolproducing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process. Appl Environ Microb 2007;73:4354-6. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 1932793&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype = abstract (8 November 2014, date last accessed).
104. Pecota DC, Rajgarhia V, Da Silva NA. Sequential gene integration for the engineering of Kluyveromyces marxianus. J Biotechnol 2007;127:408-16.
105. Péter G, Tornai-Lehoczki J, Shin K-S, et al. Ogataea thermophila sp. nov., the teleomorph of Candida thermophila. FEMS Yeast Res 2007;7:494-6.
106. Pina C, Gonçalves P, Prista C, et al. Ffz1, a new transporter specific for fructose from Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Microbiology 2004;150:2429-33.
107. Piskur J, Langkjaer RB. Yeast genome sequencing: the power of comparative genomics. Mol Microbiol 2004;53:381-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15228521 (9 March 2015, date last accessed).
108. Piškur J, Ling Z, Marcet-Houben M, et al. The genome of wine yeast Dekkera bruxellensis provides a tool to explore its food-related properties. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;157:202-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22663979 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
109. Piškur J, Polakova S, Merico A, et al. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? 2006;22: 2-5.
110. Pitt JI, Hocking AD. Fungi and Food Spoilage. 3rd edn. Springer USA, 2009, pp. 519. ISBN-10: 0387922067.
111. Potier S, Sychrova H, Kinclova O. The Candida albicans Na/H antiporter exports potassium and rubidium. 2001;504: 11-5.
112. Praphailong W, Fleet G. The effect of pH, sodium chloride, sucrose, sorbate and benzoate on the growth of food spoilage yeasts. Food Microbiol 1997;14:459-68.
113. Pretorius ISS. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 2000;16:675-729. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10861899 (26 June 2015, date last accessed).
114. Pribylova L, de Montigny J, Sychrova H. Tools for the genetic manipulation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. FEMS Yeast Res 2007;7:1285-94.
115. Pribylova L, Papouskova K, Sychrova H. The salt tolerant yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii possesses two plasma-membrane Na+/H+-antiporters (ZrNha1p and ZrSod2-22p) playing different roles in cation homeostasis and cell physiology. Fungal Genet Biol 2008;45:1439-47.
116. Pribylova L, Sychrova H. Efficient transformation of the osmotolerant yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii by electroporation. J Microbiol Methods 2003;55:481-4.
117. Procházka E, Poláková S, Piskur J, et al. Mitochondrial genome from the facultative anaerobe and petite-positive yeast Dekkera bruxellensis contains the NADH dehydrogenase subunit genes. FEMS Yeast Res 2010;10:545-57. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20528950 (29 October 2014, date last accessed).
118. Prudêncio C, Sansonetty F, Côrte-Real M. Flow cytometric assessment of cell structural and functional changes induced by acetic acid in the yeasts Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cytometry 1998;31:307-13.
119. Puligundla P, Smogrovicova D, Obulam VSR, et al. Very high gravity (VHG) ethanolic brewing and fermentation: a research update. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011;38: 1133-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21695540 (10 September 2013, date last accessed).
120. Qian M, Tian S, Li X, et al. Ethanol production from diluteacid softwood hydrolysate by co-culture. Appl Biochem Biotech 2006;134:273-84.
121. Querol A. Adaptive evolution of wine yeast. Int J Food Microbiol 2003;86:3-10.
122. Ramezani-Rad M, Hollenberg CP, Lauber J, et al. The Hansenula polymorpha (strain CBS4732) genome sequencing and analysis. FEMS Yeast Res 2003;4:207-15.
123. Ravin NV, EldarovMA, Kadnikov VV, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha DL1. BMC Genomics 2013;14:837.
124. Reinders A, Romano I, Wiemken A, et al. The thermophilic yeast Hansenula polymorpha does not require trehalose synthesis for growth at high temperatures but does for normal acquisition of thermotolerance. J Bacteriol 1999;181: 4665-8.
125. Renouf V, Falcou M, Miot-Sertier C, et al. Interactions between Brettanomyces bruxellensis and other yeast species during the initial stages of winemaking. J Appl Microbiol 2006;100:1208-19. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16696668 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
126. Restaino L, Bills S, TscherneffK, et al. Growth characteristics of Saccharomyces rouxii isolated from chocolate syrup. Appl Environ Microb 1983;45:1614-21.
127. Rodrigues F, Côrte-Real M, Leão C, et al. Oxygen requirements of the food spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii in synthetic and complex media. Appl Environ Microb 2001;67:2123-8.
128. Rodrigues F, Zeeman A-M, Cardoso H, et al. Isolation of an acetyl- CoA synthetase gene (ZbACS2) from Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Yeast 2004;21:325-31.
129. Rouwenhorst RJ, Visser LE, Baan AA, et al. Production, distribution, and kinetic properties of inulinase in continuous cultures of Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS 6556. Appl Environ Microb 1988;54:1131-7.
130. Rozpȩdowska E, Hellborg L, Ishchuk OP, et al. Parallel evolution of the make-accumulate-consume strategy in Saccharomyces and Dekkera yeasts. Nat Commun 2011;2:302. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3112538&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (8 November 2014, date last accessed).
131. Ruyters S, Mukherjee V, Verstrepen KJ, et al. Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2015;42:39-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25413210 (4 February 2015, date last accessed).
132. Ryabova OB, Chmil OM, Sibirny AA. Xylose and cellobiose fermentation to ethanol by the thermotolerant methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Yeast Res 2003;4:157-64.
133. Saraya R, Krikken AM, Kiel JAKW, et al. Novel genetic tools for Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Yeast Res 2012;12:271-8.
134. Schifferdecker AJ, Dashko S, Ishchuk OP, et al. The wine and beer yeast Dekkera bruxellensis. Yeast 2014;31:323-32.
135. Schnierda T, Bauer FF, Divol B, et al. Optimization of carbon and nitrogen medium components for biomass production using non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. Lett Appl Microbiol 2014;58:478-85. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447289 (15 November 2014, date last accessed).
136. ™. FEMS Yeast Res 2002;2:525-32.
137. Shin K-S, Hong S-D, Bae KS. The significance of ITS-RFLPs and coenzyme Q system in determining taxonomic relationships among Candida species. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996;42:481-91.
138. Sicard D, Legras J-L. Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. C R Biol 2011;334:229-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21377618 (7 November 2014, date last accessed).
139. Siverio JM. Assimilation of nitrate by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2002;26:277-84.
140. Solieri L, Cassanelli S, Croce MA, et al. Genome size and ploidy level: new insights for elucidating relationships in Zygosaccharomyces species. Fungal Genet Biol 2008;45:1582-90.
141. Souciet J-L, Dujon B, Gaillardin C, et al. Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae. Genome Res 2009;19:1696-709. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 2765284&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (10 March 2015, date last accessed).
142. Sousa JM, Rodrigues F, Crte-real M. Mechanisms underlying the transport and intracellular metabolism of acetic acid in the presence of glucose in the yeast Microbiology 1998;144: 665-70.
143. Steensels J, Verstrepen KJ. Taming wild yeast: potential of conventional and nonconventional yeasts in industrial fermentations. Annu Rev Microbiol 2014;68:61-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24773331 (13 October 2014, date last accessed).
144. Stratford M, Steels H, Nebe-von-Caron G, et al. Extreme resistance to weak-acid preservatives in the spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Int J Food Microbiol 2013;166: 126-34.
145. Sujaya IN, Tamura Y, Tanaka T, et al. Development of internal transcribed spacer regions amplification restriction fragment length polymorphism method and its application in monitoring the population of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii M2 in miso fermentation. J Biosci Bioeng 2003;96:438-47.
146. Sychrova H, Braun V, Potier S, et al. Organization of specific genomic regions of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii and Pichia sorbitophila: comparison with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2000;16:1377-85.
147. Tabka MG, Herpöel-Gimbert I, Monod F, et al. Enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw for bioethanol production by a combined cellulase xylanase and feruloyl esterase treatment. Enzyme Microb Technol 2006;39:897-902.
148. Taillandier P, Lai QP, Julien-Ortiz A, et al. Interactions between Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in wine fermentation: influence of inoculation and nitrogen content. World J Microb Biot 2014;30:1959-67.
149. Tao X, Zheng D, Liu T, et al. A novel strategy to construct yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity fermentation. PLoS One 2012;7:e31235. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 3281935&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (2 July 2013, date last accessed).
150. Taylor MP, Mulako I, Tuffin M, et al. Understanding physiological responses to pre-treatment inhibitors in ethanologenic fermentations. Biotechnol J 2012;7:1169-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22331581 (15 July 2013, date last accessed).
151. Tokuoka K. Sugarand salt-tolerant yeasts. J Appl Bacteriol 1993;74:101-10.
152. Van Dijk R, Faber KN, Kiel JAKW, et al. The methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha: a versatile cell factory. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000;26:793-800.
153. van Zutphen T, Baerends RJS, Susanna KA, et al. Adaptation of Hansenula polymorpha to methanol: a transcriptome analysis. BMC Genomics 2010;11:1.
154. Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ, Titorenko V, et al. Hansenula polymorpha: an attractive model organism for molecular studies of peroxisome biogenesis and function. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992;100:393-403.
155. Velkova K, Sychrova H. The Debaryomyces hansenii NHA1 gene encodes a plasma membrane alkali-metal-cation antiporter with broad substrate specificity. Gene 2006;369: 27-34.
156. Vigentini I, Brambilla L, Branduardi P, et al. Heterologous protein production in Zygosaccharomyces bailii: physiological effects and fermentative strategies. FEMS Yeast Res 2005;5: 647-52.
157. Vilela-Moura A, Schuller D, Mendes-Faia A, et al. Reduction of volatile acidity of wines by selected yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biot 2008;80:881-90.
158. Villarreal MLM, Prata AMR, Felipe MGA, et al. Detoxification procedures of eucalyptus hemicellulose hydrolysate for xylitol production by Candida guilliermondii. Enzyme Microb Technol 2006;40:17-24.
159. Watanabe T, Srichuwong S, Arakane M, et al. Selection of stress-tolerant yeasts for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of very high gravity (VHG) potato mash to ethanol. Bioresource Technol 2010;101:9710-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20705456 (5 September 2013, date last accessed).
160. Wijsman MR, van Dijken JP, van KleeffBHA, et al. Inhibition of fermentation and growth in batch cultures of the yeast Brettanomyces intermedius upon a shift from aerobic to anaerobic conditions (Custers effect). Anton Leeuw 1984;50: 183-92.
161. Wojda I. Response to high osmotic conditions and elevated temperature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by intracellular glycerol and involves coordinate activity of MAP kinase pathways. Microbiology 2003;149:1193-204.
162. Woolfit M, Rozpedowska E, Piskur J, et al. Genome survey sequencing of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera (Brettanomyces) bruxellensis. Eukaryot Cell 2007;6:721-33. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 1865652&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (5 March 2015, date last accessed).
163. Xiao H, Zhao H. Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals the E3 SUMO-protein ligase gene SIZ1 as a novel determinant of furfural tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014;7:78. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 4045865&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (14 November 2014, date last accessed).
164. Yarimizu T, Nonklang S, Nakamura J, et al. Identification of auxotrophic mutants of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus by non-homologous end joining-mediated integrative transformation with genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2013;30:485-500.
165. Yurimoto H, Oku M, Sakai Y. Yeast methylotrophy: metabolism, gene regulation and peroxisome homeostasis. Int J Microbiol 2011;2011:e101298.
166. Zha Y, Hossain AH, Tobola F, et al. Pichia anomala 29X: a resistant strain for lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 2013;13:609-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826802 (18 February 2014, date last accessed).
167. Zha Y, Muilwijk B, Coulier L. Inhibitory compounds in lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates during hydrolysate fermentation processes. J Bioprocess Biotech 2012;2:1-11. http://www. omicsonline.org/2155-9821/2155-9821-2-112.digital/2155-9821-2-112.html (11 September 2013, date last accessed).
168. Zhou Q, Liu ZL, Ning K, et al. Genomic and transcriptome analyses reveal that MAPK- and phosphatidylinositolsignaling pathways mediate tolerance to 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde for industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep 2014;4:6556. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= 4190571&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (14 November 2014, date last accessed).